arXiv reader

Generalized Mannheim Curves in Minkowski space-time E_1^4

Soley Ersoy, Murat Tosun and Hiroo Matsuda

arXiv
1006.4470v1 · PDF · 23 June 2010
Categories
math.DG
Journal
Hokkaido Mathematical Journal 41 (2012), no. 3, 441-461
DOI
10.14492/hokmj/1351086223
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

In this paper, the definition of generalized spacelike Mannheim curve in Minkowski space-time E_1^4 is given. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the generalized spacelike Mannheim curve are obtained. Also, some characterizations of Mannheim curve are given.

Items 6

Definition

Definition 3.1

20QR

A special spacelike curve C in E_1^4 is a generalized spacelike Mannheim curve if there exists a special spacelike Frenet curve {C^*} in E_1^4 such that the first normal line at each of C is included in the plane generated by the second normal line and the third normal line of {C^*} at the corresponding point under \phi. Here \phi is a bijection from C to {C^*}. The curve {C^*} is called the generalized spacelike Mannheim mate curve of C.

Theorem

Theorem 3.1

LZNC

If a special spacelike Frenet curve C in E_1^4 is a generalized spacelike Mannheim curve, then the first curvature function {k_1} and the second curvature function {k_2} of C satisfy the equality

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right)\,\,,\,\,s \in L \end{array}

where \alpha is a constant number and {\mu _1} = {\mu _2} = - 1 when {{\bf{e}}_4} is timelike or {\mu _1} = - 1\,,\,\,{\mu _2} = 1 when {{\bf{e}}_3} is timelike or {\mu _1} = {\mu _2} = 1 when {{\bf{e}}_2} is timelike.

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Let C be a generalized spacelike Mannheim curve and {C^*} be the generalized spacelike Mannheim mate curve of C with the diagram;

\begin{array}{l} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop {\bf{c}}\limits_{ \cdot \,\, \cdot } \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\mathop {\bf{c}}\limits_{ \cdot \,\, \cdot } ^*}\, \\ f:\,\,\,\,L\,\,\,\,\,\, \to \,\,\,\,\,{L^*}\, \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \downarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \downarrow \\ \phi \,:\,\,\,E_1^4\,\,\, \to \,\,\,E_1^4. \\ \end{array}

A smooth function f is defined by f\left( s \right) = \int {\left\| {\frac{{d{{\bf{c}}^*}\left( s \right)}}{{ds}}} \right\|} ds = {s^*} and {s^*} is the arc-length parameter of {C^*}. Also \phi is a bijection which is defined by \phi \left( {{\bf{c}}\left( s \right)} \right) = {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right). Thus, the spacelike curve {C^*} is reparametrized by

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\bf{c}}\left( s \right) + \alpha \left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \end{array}

where \alpha is a smooth function. By differentiating both sides of (3.3) with respect to s

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha \left( s \right){k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_1} + \alpha '\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \alpha \left( s \right){k_2}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) \\ \end{array}

is obtained.

On the other hand, since the first normal line at the each point of C is lying in the plane generated by the second normal line and the third normal line of {C^*} at the corresponding points under bijection \phi, the vector field {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) is given by

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) = g\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_3^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) + h\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) \end{array}

where g and h are some smooth functions on L. If we take into consideration

\begin{array}{l} \left\langle {{\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right),\,g\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_3^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) + h\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right\rangle = 0 \end{array}

and the equation (3.4), then we have \alpha '\left( s \right) =0. So we rewrite the equation (3.4) as

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right), \end{array}

that is,

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \frac{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) \end{array}

where

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2} + \varepsilon_3 {{\left( {\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2}} \right|} \,,\,\,\varepsilon_3 = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} - 1\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_3}\,\,{\rm{is\,\, timelike}}{\rm{,}} \\ \,\,\,\,1\,\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_3}\,\,{\rm{is\,\, spacelike}}{\rm{.}} \\ \end{array} \right. \end{array}

By taking differentiation both sides of the equations (3.5) with respect to s,

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right)k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {\frac{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha {{\left( {{k_2}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2}}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + {\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) + \left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right) \\ \end{array}

is obtained for s \in L. Since

\begin{array}{l} \left\langle {{\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right),\,g\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_3^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) + h\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right\rangle = 0, \end{array}

then in the equation (3.6) the coefficient of {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) vanishes, that is,

\begin{array}{l} \left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha {\left( {{k_2}\left( s \right)} \right)^2} = 0. \end{array}

Thus, {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right) is satisfied. This completes the proof.

If we investigate the special cases separately, then we have

in the Case 1;

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = \alpha \left( {k_1^2\left( s \right) + k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right), \end{array}

in the Case 2;

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = \alpha \left( {k_1^2\left( s \right) - k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right), \end{array}

in the Case 3;

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {k_1^2\left( s \right) + k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right). \end{array}
Theorem.

Let C be a special spacelike Frenet curve in E_1^4 whose curvature functions {k_1} and {k_2} are non-constant functions and satisfy the equality {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right), where \alpha is non-zero constant, for all s \in L. If the spacelike curve {C^*} given by

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( s \right) = {\bf{c}}\left( s \right) + \alpha {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \end{array}

is a special spacelike Frenet curve, then {C^*} is a generalized spacelike Mannheim mate curve of C.

Proof

Proof

8K6Z

The arc-length parameter of {C^*} is defined by

\begin{array}{l} {s^*} = \int\limits_0^s {\left\| {\frac{{d{{\bf{c}}^*}\left( s \right)}}{{ds}}} \right\|} ds \end{array}

for all s \in L. Under the assumptation of

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right) \end{array}

and after calculations for all cases, separately, we obtain

in the Case 1; \,\,\,\,f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {1 - \alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|},

in the Case 2; \,\,\,\,f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {1 - \alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|},

in the Case 3; \,\,\,\,f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {1 + \alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|}.

Thus, we can generalize

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} \end{array}

for all s \in L.

By differentiating the equation {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\bf{c}}\left( s \right) + \alpha {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) with respect to s, it is seen that

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right). \end{array}

So, it is seen that

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }}{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }}{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right)} \right) \end{array}

for s \in L.

The differentiation of the last equation with respect to s is

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right)k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\left( {\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} } \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {\frac{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha k_2^2\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }}} \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + {\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) + \left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }}} \right){{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right). \\ \end{array}

According to our assumption,

\begin{array}{l} \frac{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha k_2^2\left( s \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left| {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right|} }} = 0 \end{array}

is hold. Thus, the coefficient of {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) in the equation (3.8) is zero. It is seen from the equation (3.8), {\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) is given by linear combination of {{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right),\;\,{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) and {{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right). Also, from equation (3.7), {\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) is a linear combination of {{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) and {{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right). Moreover, {C^*} is a special spacelike Frenet curve that the vector {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) is given by linear combination of {\bf{e}}_3^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) and {\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right).

Therefore, the first normal line C lies in the plane generated by the second normal line and third normal line of {C^*} at the corresponding points under a bijection \phi which is defined by \phi \left( {{\bf{c}}\left( s \right)} \right) = {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right). Thus, the proof of the theorem is completed.

Remark.

In 4-dimensional Minkowski space for a special spacelike Frenet curve C with curvature functions {k_1} and {k_2} satisfying

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) = - \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}{\mu _3}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right), \end{array}

it is not clear that a smooth spacelike curve {C^*} given by (3.1) is a special Frenet curve. So, it is unknown whether the reverse of Theorem 3.1 is true or false.

Theorem.

Let C be a spacelike special curve in E_1^4 with non-zero third curvature function {k_3}. If there exists a spacelike special Frenet curve {C^*} in E_1^4 such that the first normal line of C is linearly dependent with the third normal line of {C^*} at the corresponding points \bf{c}\left( s \right) and {\bf{c}^*}\left( s \right), respectively, under a bijection \phi :C \to {C^*}, then the curvatures {k_1} and {k_2} of C are constant functions.

Proof

Proof

F8XW

Let C be a spacelike Frenet curve in E_1^4 with the Frenet frame field \left\{ {{{\bf{e}}_1},\,{{\bf{e}}_2},\,{{\bf{e}}_3},\,{{\bf{e}}_4}} \right\} and curvature functions {k_1},\,{k_2} and {k_3}. Also, we assume that {C^*} be a spacelike special Frenet curve in E_1^4 with the Frenet frame field \left\{ {{\bf{e}}_1^*,\,{\bf{e}}_2^*,\,{\bf{e}}_3^*,\,{\bf{e}}_4^*} \right\} and curvature functions k_1^*,\,k_2^*\, and k_3^*.

Let the first normal line of C be linearly dependent with the third normal line of {C^*} at the corresponding points C and {C^*}, respectively. Then the parametrization of {C^*} is

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\bf{c}}\left( s \right) + \alpha \left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \end{array}

for all s \in L. If {s^*} is the arc-length parameter of {C^*}, then

\begin{array}{l} {s^*} = \int\limits_0^s {\sqrt {\left| {{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}} \right)}^2} + \varepsilon_2 \left( {\alpha '\left( s \right)} \right) + \varepsilon_3 {{\left( {\alpha \left( s \right){k_2}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2}} \right|} } ds \end{array}

where

\begin{array}{l} \varepsilon_i = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} - 1\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_i}\,\,{\rm{is}}\,\,{\rm{timelike}} \\ \,\,\,1\,\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_i}\,\,{\rm{is}}\,\,{\rm{spacelike}} \\ \end{array} \right.,\,\,\,{\rm{for}}\,\,\,\,\, {\rm{ }}2 \le i \le 4 \end{array}

and

\begin{array}{l} f:\,L \to {L^*} \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,s\,\, \to \,f\left( s \right) = {s^*}. \\ \end{array}

Moreover, \phi :C \to {C^*} is a bijection given by \phi \left( {{\bf{c}}\left( s \right)} \right) = {{\bf{c}}^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right).

By differentiating the equation (3.9) with respect to s and using Frenet formulas, we have

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha \left( s \right){k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \alpha '\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \alpha \left( s \right){k_2}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right). \\ \end{array}

Since {\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \mp {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right), then

\begin{array}{l} \left\langle {f'\left( s \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right),\,{\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right\rangle = \left\langle {\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha \left( s \right){k_1}\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \alpha '\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right)} \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. { + \alpha \left( s \right){k_2}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right),\, \mp {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right)} \right\rangle , \\ \end{array}

that is,

\begin{array}{l} 0 = \mp \alpha '\left( s \right). \end{array}

It is easily seen that \alpha is a constant number from the last equation. Thus, hereafter we can denote \alpha \left( s \right) = \alpha, for all s \in L.

From the equation (3.10), we get

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right) = \sqrt {\left| {{{\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2} + \varepsilon_3 {{\left( {\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)} \right)}^2}} \right|} > 0 \end{array}

where

\begin{array}{l} \varepsilon_3 = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} - 1\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_i}\,\,{\rm{is}}\,\,{\rm{timelike}} \\ \,\,\,\,1\,\,,\,\,{{\bf{e}}_i}\,\,{\rm{is}}\,\,{\rm{spacelike}} \\ \end{array} \right. \,\,\,\,,\,{\rm{for }}\,\,\,\,\, 2 \le i \le 4. \end{array}

Then, we rewrite the equation (3.11) as follows;

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right).\ \end{array}

The differentiation of the last equation with respect to s is

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right)k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = {\left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {\frac{{{k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _1}\alpha k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha k_2^2\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,+ {\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) + \left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right). \\ \end{array}

Since \left\langle {f'\left( s \right)k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right),\,{\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right\rangle = 0 and {\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \mp {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) for all s \in L, we obtain

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _1}\alpha k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}\alpha k_2^2\left( s \right) = 0 \end{array}

is satisfied. Then,

\begin{array}{l} \alpha = - \frac{{{k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{{\mu _1} k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2} k_2^2\left( s \right)}} \end{array}

is a non-zero constant number. Thus, from the equation (3.12), it is seen that

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{e}}_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{\left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) + \frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right){{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right) \\ \end{array}

where K\left( s \right) = k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) for all s \in L. By differentiating the last equation with respect to s, we obtain

\begin{array}{l} f'\left( s \right)\left[ {{\mu _1}k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) + k_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_3^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right] = {\left( {\frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime }} \right)^\prime }{{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {\frac{k_1{\left(s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime } + \frac{{{\mu _2}{k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime }} \right){{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {{{\left( {\frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime }} \right)}^\prime } + \frac{{{\mu _3}{k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_3}\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + \left( {{{\left( {\frac{1}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime }} \right)}^\prime } + \frac{{{k_3}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)K\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right)}}{{f'\left( s \right)}}} \right)}^\prime }} \right){{\bf{e}}_4}\left( s \right) \\ \end{array}

for all s \in L. If we take into consideration

\begin{array}{l} \left\langle {f'\left( s \right)\left( {{\mu _1}k_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){\bf{e}}_1^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) + k_2^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right){{\bf{e}}_3^*}\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right)\,,\,\,{\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right)} \right\rangle = 0\ \end{array}

and

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{e}}_4^*\left( {f\left( s \right)} \right) = \mp {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right),\ \end{array}

then

\begin{array}{l} {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right){k_1}^\prime \left( s \right) {f'\left( s \right)}- {k_1}\left( s \right)\left( {1 + {\mu _1}\alpha {k_1}\left( s \right)} \right)f''\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + {\mu _2}\alpha {k_2}\left( s \right){k_2}^\prime \left( s \right){f'\left( s \right)} - {\mu _2}\alpha k_2^2\left( s \right)f''\left( s \right) = 0. \\ \end{array}

If we arrange the last equation, then we find

\begin{array}{l} \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}{k_1}\left( s \right){{k'}_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}{k_2}\left( s \right){{k'}_2}\left( s \right)} \right)f'\left( s \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, - \left( {{k_1} + \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}k_1^2\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}k_2^2\left( s \right)} \right)} \right)f''\left( s \right) = 0. \\ \end{array}

Moreover, the differentiation of the equation (3.13) with respect to s is

\begin{array}{l} {k'_1}\left( s \right) + 2\alpha \left( {{\mu _1}{k_1}\left( s \right){{k'}_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}{k_2}\left( s \right){{k'}_2}\left( s \right)} \right) = 0. \end{array}

From the above equation, we see

\begin{array}{l} - \frac{{{{k'}_1}\left( s \right)}}{2} = \alpha \left( {{\mu _1}{k_1}\left( s \right){{k'}_1}\left( s \right) + {\mu _2}{k_2}\left( s \right){{k'}_2}\left( s \right)} \right). \end{array}

If we substitute the equations (3.13) and (3.15) into the equation (3.14), we obtain

\begin{array}{l} - \frac{{{{k'}_1}\left( s \right)}}{2} = 0. \end{array}

Finally, we find that the first curvature function is constant (that is, positive constant).

Thus, from the equation (3.15) it is seen that the second curvature function {k_2} is positive constant, too. This completes the proof.

In [Eis], a formula of parametric equation of Mannheim curve is given in {E^3}. Moreover, the parametric equation of generalized Mannheim curve in {E^4} is obtained in [Mat2]. The following theorem gives a parametric representation of a generalized spacelike Mannheim curve with timelike second binormal vector in E_1^4.

Theorem.

Let be a spacelike special curve defined by

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{c}}\left( u \right) = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)\sinh udu} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)\cosh udu} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)g\left( u \right)du} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)h\left( u \right)du} } \\ \end{array}} \right]\ \end{array}

for u \in I \subset\mathbb{R}. Here \alpha is a non-zero constant number, g:I \to \mathbb{R} and h:I \to \mathbb{R} are any smooth functions and the positive valued smooth function f:I \to \mathbb{R} is given by

\begin{array}{l} f\left( u \right) = \left( {1 + g^2 \left( u \right) + h^2 \left( u \right)} \right)^{{{ - 3} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 3} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left| { - 1 - g^2 \left( u \right) - h^2 \left( u \right) + \dot g^2 \left( u \right) + \dot h^2 \left( u \right) + \left( {\dot g\left( u \right)h\left( u \right) - g\left( u \right)\dot h\left( u \right)} \right)^2 } \right|^{{{ - 5} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 5} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\;\left| {\left( { - 1 - g^2 \left( u \right) - h^2 \left( u \right) + \dot g^2 \left( u \right) + \dot h^2 \left( u \right) + \left( {\dot g\left( u \right)h\left( u \right) - g\left( u \right)\dot h\left( u \right)} \right)^2 } \right)^3 } \right. \\ \quad \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, - \left( {1 + g^2 \left( u \right) + h^2 \left( u \right)} \right)^3 \left[ {\left( {g\left( u \right) - \ddot g\left( u \right)} \right)^2 + \left( {h\left( u \right) - \ddot h\left( u \right)} \right)^2 } \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. {\, - \left( {\left( {g\left( u \right)\dot h\left( u \right) - \dot g\left( u \right)h\left( u \right)} \right) + \left( {\dot g\left( u \right)\ddot h\left( u \right) - \ddot g\left( u \right)\dot h\left( u \right)} \right)} \right)^2 + \left( {g\left( u \right)\ddot h\left( u \right) - \ddot g\left( u \right)h} \right)\left( u \right)^2 } \right| \\ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \;\;\quad \quad \quad \;\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,, \\ \end{array}

for u \in I. Then the curvature functions {k_1} and {k_2} of C satisfy

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}\left( u \right) = \alpha \left( {k_1^2\left( u \right) + k_2^2\left( u \right)} \right) \end{array}

at the each point {\bf{c}}\left( u \right) of C.

Proof

Proof

30B0

Let C be a spacelike special curve defined by

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{c}}\left( u \right) = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)\sinh udu} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)\cosh udu} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)g\left( u \right)du} } \\ {\alpha \int {f\left( u \right)h\left( u \right)du} } \\ \end{array}} \right]\quad ,\quad u \in I \subset\mathbb{R} \end{array}

where \alpha is a non-zero constant number, g and h are any smooth functions. f is a positive valued smooth function. Thus, we obtain

\begin{array}{l} {\bf{\dot c}}\left( u \right) = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\alpha f\left( u \right)\sinh u} \\ {\alpha f\left( u \right)\cosh u} \\ {\alpha f\left( u \right)g\left( u \right)} \\ {\alpha f\left( u \right)h\left( u \right)} \\ \end{array}} \right]\quad ,\quad u \in I \subset\mathbb{R} \end{array}

where the subscript dot (.) denotes the differentiation with respect to u.

The arc-length parameter s of C is given by

\begin{array}{l} s = \psi \left( u \right) = \int\limits_{{u_0}}^u {\left\| {{\bf{\dot c}}\left( u \right)} \right\|} du\ \end{array}

where \left\| {{\bf{\dot c}}\left( u \right)} \right\| = \alpha f\left( u \right)\sqrt {1 + {g^2}\left( u \right) + {h^2}\left( u \right)}.

If \varphi denotes the inverse function of \psi :I \to L \subset\mathbb{R}, then u = \varphi \left( s \right) and

\begin{array}{l} \varphi '\left( s \right) = {\left\| {{{\left. {\frac{{d{\bf{c}}\left( u \right)}}{{du}}} \right|}_{u = \varphi \left( s \right)}}} \right\|^{ - 1}}\quad ,\quad s \in I \end{array}

where the prime \left( ' \right) denotes the differentiation with respect to s.

The unit tangent vector {{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) of the curve C at the each point {\bf{c}}\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) is given by

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) = {\left( {1 + {g^2}\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) + {h^2}\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)} \right)^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\sinh \left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)} \\ {\cosh \left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)} \\ {g\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)} \\ {h\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)} \\ \end{array}} \right] \end{array}

for all s \in L. Some simplifying assumptions are made for the sake of brevity as follows;

\begin{array}{l} \sinh : = \sinh \left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)\quad ,\quad \quad \cosh : = \cosh \left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) \\ f: = f\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)\quad \quad \quad \,\, , \quad \quad g: = g\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right)\quad \quad \quad ,\quad h: = h\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right), \\ \dot g: = \dot g\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) = {\left. {\frac{{dg\left( u \right)}}{{du}}} \right|_{u = \varphi \left( s \right)}}\quad ,\quad \dot h: = \dot h\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) = {\left. {\frac{{dh\left( u \right)}}{{du}}} \right|_{u = \varphi \left( s \right)}}, \\ \ddot g: = \ddot g\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) = {\left. {\frac{{{d^2}g\left( u \right)}}{{d{u^2}}}} \right|_{u = \varphi \left( s \right)}}\quad ,\quad \ddot h: = \ddot h\left( {\varphi \left( s \right)} \right) = {\left. {\frac{{{d^2}h\left( u \right)}}{{d{u^2}}}} \right|_{u = \varphi \left( s \right)}}, \\ \varphi ': = \varphi '\left( s \right) = {\left. {\frac{{d\varphi }}{{ds}}} \right|_s}, \\ A: = 1 + {g^2} + {h^2}\quad \,\,\,,\quad \quad B: = g\dot g + h\dot h\quad ,\quad C: = {{\dot g}^2} + {{\dot h}^2}, \\ D: = g\ddot g + h\ddot h\quad \quad \quad ,\quad \quad E: = \dot g\ddot g + \dot h\ddot h\quad ,\quad F: = {{\ddot g}^2} + {{\ddot h}^2}.\quad \\ \end{array}

Then, we have

\begin{array}{l} \dot A = 2B\quad ,\quad \dot B = C + D\quad ,\quad \dot C = 2E\quad ,\quad \varphi ' = {\alpha ^{ - 1}}{f^{ - 1}}{A^{{{ - 1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 1} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}. \end{array}

So, we rewrite the equation (3.17) as

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e}}_1}: = {{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right) = {A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\sinh } \\ {\cosh } \\ g \\ h \\ \end{array}} \right]. \end{array}

By differentiating the last equation with respect to s, we find

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e'}}_1} = \varphi '\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} { - \frac{1}{2}{A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot A\sinh + {A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\cosh } \\ { - \frac{1}{2}{A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot A\cosh + {A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\sinh } \\ { - \frac{1}{2}{A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot Ag + {A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot g} \\ { - \frac{1}{2}{A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot Ah + {A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\dot h} \\ \end{array}} \right], \end{array}

that is,

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e'}}_1} = - \varphi '{A^{ - {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{A^{ - 1}}B\sinh - \cosh } \\ {{A^{ - 1}}B\cosh - \sinh } \\ {{A^{ - 1}}Bg - \dot g} \\ {{A^{ - 1}}Bh - \dot h} \\ \end{array}} \right]. \end{array}

From the last equation, we obtain

\begin{array}{l} {k_1}: = {k_1}\left( s \right) = \left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_1}\left( s \right)} \right\| = \varphi '{A^{ - 1}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}. \end{array}

By the fact that {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) = {\left( {{k_1}\left( s \right)} \right)^{ - 1}}{{\bf{e'}}_1}\left( s \right), we have

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e}}_2}: = {{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right) = - {A^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{{{ - 1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 1} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{A^{ - 1}}B\sinh - \cosh } \\ {{A^{ - 1}}B\cosh - \sinh } \\ {{A^{ - 1}}Bg - \dot g} \\ {{A^{ - 1}}Bh - \dot h} \\ \end{array}} \right]. \end{array}

In order to get second curvature function {k_2}, we need to calculate {k_2}\left( s \right) = \left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_2}\left( s \right) - {\mu _1}{k_1}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right)} \right\|. It is seen from the above equation \left\langle {{{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right),{{\bf{e}}_2}\left( s \right)} \right\rangle = 1, that is, {{\bf{e}}_2} is spacelike. Thus, {\mu _1} is equal to - 1 and {k_2}\left( s \right) = \left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_2}\left( s \right) + {k_1}\left( s \right){{\bf{e}}_1}\left( s \right)} \right\|. After a long process of calculation, we have

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e'}}_2} + {k_1}{{\bf{e}}_1} = \varphi '{A^{{{ - 3} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 3} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{{{ - 3} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 3} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left( {P + Q} \right)\sinh - R\cosh } \\ {\left( {P + Q} \right)\cosh - R\sinh } \\ {Pg - R\dot g + Q\ddot g} \\ {Ph - R\dot h + Q\ddot h} \\ \end{array}} \right] \end{array}

where

\begin{array}{l} P = {\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)^2} + \left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)\left( {{B^2} - AC - AD} \right) \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, + AB\left( { - B + AE - BD} \right), \\ Q = {A^2}\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right), \\ R = {A^2}\left( { - B + AE - BD} \right). \\ \end{array}

If we simplify P then we have

\begin{array}{l} P = {A^2}\left( {1 - C + BE + D - CD} \right). \end{array}

Thus, we rewrite the equations (3.22) and (3.23) as

\begin{array}{l} {{\bf{e'}}_2} + {k_1}{{\bf{e}}_1} = \varphi '{A^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{{{ - 3} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 3} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left( {\tilde P + \tilde Q} \right)\sinh - \tilde R\cosh } \\ {\left( {\tilde P + \tilde Q} \right)\cosh - \tilde R\sinh } \\ {\tilde Pg - \tilde R\dot g + \tilde Q\ddot g} \\ {\tilde Ph - \tilde R\dot h + \tilde Q\ddot h} \\ \end{array}} \right] \end{array}

where

\begin{array}{l} \tilde P = 1 - C + BE + D - CD, \\ \tilde Q = - A + AC - {B^2}, \\ \tilde R = - B + AE - BD. \\ \end{array}

Consequently, from the equations (3.24) and (3.25), we find

\begin{array}{l} {\left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_2} + {k_1}{{\bf{e}}_1}} \right\|^2} = {\left( {\varphi '} \right)^2}A{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{ - 3}}\,\left| {{{\left( {\tilde P + \tilde Q} \right)}^2} - {{\tilde R}^2}} \right. \\ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \, + {{\tilde P}^2}\left( {{g^2} + {h^2}} \right) + {{\tilde R}^2}\left( {{{\dot g}^2} + {{\dot h}^2}} \right) + {{\tilde Q}^2}\left( {{{\ddot g}^2} + {{\ddot h}^2}} \right) \\ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \,\left. { - 2\tilde P\tilde R\left( {g\dot g + h\dot h} \right) - 2\tilde R\tilde Q\left( {\dot g\ddot g + \dot h\ddot h} \right) + 2\tilde P\tilde Q\left( {g\ddot g + h\ddot h} \right)} \right|. \\ \end{array}

If we substitute the abbreviations into the last equation, we get

\begin{array}{l} {\left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_2} + {k_1}{{\bf{e}}_1}} \right\|^2} = {\left( {\varphi '} \right)^2}A{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{ - 3}} \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left| {{{\tilde P}^2}A + 2\tilde P\tilde Q + {{\tilde Q}^2} - {{\tilde R}^2} + {{\tilde R}^2}C} \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. { + {{\tilde Q}^2}F - 2\tilde P\tilde RB - 2\tilde R\tilde QE + 2\tilde P\tilde QD} \right|. \\ \end{array}

After substituting the equation (3.24) into the last equation and simplifying it, we have

\begin{array}{l} k_2^2 = {\left\| {{{{\bf{e'}}}_2} + {k_1}{{\bf{e}}_1}} \right\|^2} \\ \quad \, = {\left( {\varphi '} \right)^2}A{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{ - 2}}\,\,\left| {\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)\left( {1 + F} \right)} \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. { + \left( {1 - C} \right){{\left( {1 + D} \right)}^2} + 2BE\left( {1 + D} \right) - A{E^2}} \right|\,. \\ \end{array}

Moreover, from the equation (3.20) it is seen that

\begin{array}{l} k_1^2 = {\left( {\varphi '} \right)^2}{A^{ - 2}}\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|. \end{array}

The last two equation gives us

\begin{array}{l} k_1^2 + k_2^2 = {\left( {\varphi '} \right)^2}{A^{ - 2}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{ - 2}}\left| {{{\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)}^3}} \right. \\ \quad \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. { + {A^3}\left( {\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)\left( {1 + F} \right) + \left( {1 - C} \right){{\left( {1 + D} \right)}^2} + 2BE\left( {1 + D} \right) - A{E^2}} \right)} \right|. \\ \end{array}

By the fact \varphi ' = {\alpha ^{ - 1}}{f^{ - 1}}{A^{{{ - 1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 1} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}, we obtain

\begin{array}{l} k_1^2 + k_2^2 = {\alpha ^{ - 2}}{f^{ - 2}}{A^{ - 3}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{ - 2}}\left| {{{\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)}^3}} \right. \\ \quad \quad \quad \;\left. {\,\, + {A^3}\left( {\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)\left( {1 + F} \right) + \left( {1 - C} \right){{\left( {1 + D} \right)}^2} + 2BE\left( {1 + D} \right) - A{E^2}} \right)} \right|. \\ \end{array}

and

\begin{array}{l} {k_1} = {\alpha ^{ - 1}}{f^{ - 1}}{A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}. \end{array}

According to our assumption,

\begin{array}{l} f = {\left( {1 + {g^2} + {h^2}} \right)^{{{ - 3} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 3} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left| { - 1 - {g^2} - {h^2} + {{\dot g}^2} + {{\dot h}^2} + {{\left( {\dot gh - g\dot h} \right)}^2}} \right|^{{{ - 5} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 5} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}} \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left| {{{\left( { - 1 - {g^2} - {h^2} + {{\dot g}^2} + {{\dot h}^2} + {{\left( {\dot gh - g\dot h} \right)}^2}} \right)}^3}} \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, - {\left( {1 + {g^2} + {h^2}} \right)^3}\,\left( {{{\left( {g - \ddot g} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {h - \ddot h} \right)}^2}} \right. \\ \quad \left. {\left. {\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, - {{\left( {\left( {g\dot h - \dot gh} \right) + \left( {\dot g\ddot h - \ddot g\dot h} \right)} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {g\ddot h - \ddot gh} \right)}^2}} \right)} \right|, \\ \end{array}

we obtain

\begin{array}{l} f = {A^{ - {3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}{\left| { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right|^{{{ - 5} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 5} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}}\left| {{{\left( { - A + AC - {B^2}} \right)}^3}} \right. \\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left. {\, + {A^3}\left( {\left( {1 + F} \right) + \left( {1 - C} \right){{\left( {1 + D} \right)}^2} + 2BE\left( {1 + D} \right) - A{E^2}} \right)} \right|. \\ \end{array}

If we substitute the above equations (3.25) and (3.26), we obtain

\begin{array}{l} {k_1} = \alpha \left( {k_1^2 + k_2^2} \right). \end{array}

The proof is completed.

In the above equation {\mu _1} = {\mu _2} = - 1 which is the special Case 1. This formula is the parametric equation of generalized spacelike Mannheim curve with timelike second binormal vector in the Minkowski space-time E_1^4.

Thebibliography.

9

Onei B. O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity, Academic Press, New York, (1983). Str D. J. Struik, Differential geometry, Second ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, (1961). Bal2 H. Balgetir, M. Bektaṣ, J. Inoguchi, Null Bertrand curves in Minkowski 3-space and their characterizations, Note Math., 23, no. 1, (2004). Bal1 H. Balgetir, M. Bektaṣ, M. Ergüt, Bertrand Curves for Nonnull Curves in 3-Dimensional Lorentzian Space, Hadronic Journal, 27, (2004). Liu H. Liu, F. Wang, Mannheim Partner curves in 3-space, Journal of Geometry, 88, 120-126, (2008). Mat1 H. Matsuda, S. Yorozu, Notes on Bertrand curves, Yokohama Math. J. 50, no. 1-2, 41-58, (2003). Mat2 H. Matsuda, S. Yorozu, On generalized Mannheim curves in Euclidean 4-space, (English), Nihonkai Math. J., 20, no. 1, 33-56, (2009). Orb K. Orbay, E. Kasap, On Mannheim Partner Curves in {E^3}, International Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 4 (5), pp. 261-264, May, (2009). Eis L.P.A. Eisenhart, Treatise on the Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, New York, Dover, (1960). Car M.P. Do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Pearson Education, (1976). Tig O. Tigano, Sulla determinazione delle curve di Mannheim , Matematiche Catania 3, 25-29, (1948). Ekm N. Ekmekci, K. Ilarslan, On Bertrand curves and their characterization, Differ. Geom. Dyn. Syst.(electronic), vol. 3, no. 2, (2001). Blum R. Blum, A remarkable class of Mannheim curves, Canad. Math. Bull. 9, 223-228, (1966). Kuh W. Kuhnel, Differential geometry, Curves-surfaces-manifolds, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, (1999). Nad Z. Nádeník, Bertrand curves in five-dimensional space, (Russian), Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 57-87, (1952).

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1006.4470v1 by Soley Ersoy, Murat Tosun and Hiroo Matsuda, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1006/1006.4470.jsonl.