Hybrid Beamforming Design and Performance with Imperfect Phase Shifters in Multiuser Millimeter Wave Systems

Wendi Wang, Huarui Yin, Xiaohui Chen and Weidong Wang

arXiv: 1803.00317v3 · PDF · 4 September 2018
Categories: cs.IT, math.IT
Licence: CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Hybrid beamforming (HBF) includes analog beamforming with phase shifted array in RF domain and digital beamforming in baseband domain. Phase shifted array is usually made up with a large amount of phase shifters. Limited to the manufacturing techniques, phase shifters are unavoidable to have phaseshifting error and gain error. In the paper we study the influence of imperfect phase shifters upon the performance of multiuser mmWave massive MIMO systems1 with the wireless channel modeled by Rice fading. We derive the upper bound of the achievable sum rate with imperfect phase shifters, which can be very tight when the number of the antennas at the base station is much larger than the number of users. Results show that there is a performance ceiling due to phase-shifting error and gain error. Then we propose a novel channel estimation and hybrid beamforming method to settle this problem with low training overhead. It performs well when the channel paths are few and the channel Rician K-factor is large, which can be easily satisfied in outdoor mmWave communication environment. We further make a tradeoff between the performance and the training overhead so that the algorithm can work well in more kinds of propagation environment.

Items 5

Theorem

Theorem 1

01BI

In multiuser scenario, the lower bound of E_{\Delta {\bf{h}}_{{\textrm{eq}},{k_I}} }[\Delta {\bf{h}}_{{\textrm{eq}},{k_I}} {\bf{F}}_{\textrm{BB}}{\bf{F}}_{\textrm{BB}}^* \Delta {\bf{h}}_{{\textrm{eq}},{k_I}} ^* ] can be expressed as

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} E_{\Delta {\bf{h}}_{{\textrm{eq}},k_I} }[x_{k_I}] & \geqslant (\sigma_{\delta}^2)^2 + \frac{K_I (\sigma_{\delta}^2 + \sigma_{\alpha}^2)^2}{N_{\text{BS}}N_{\text{UE}}} \\ & \quad +(\sigma_{\delta}^2+\sigma_{\alpha}^2) e^{-\sigma_{\delta}^2}(\frac{K_I}{N_{\text{BS}}}+\frac{1}{N_{\text{UE}}}) \\ \end{split} \end{aligned}

When N_{\text{BS}} \to \infty or N_{\text{BS}} \gg K_I, the bound can be very tight.

Corollary

Corollary 1

YAJ9

In the high SNR regime, the performance ceiling of the achievable sum rate with imperfect phase shifters is

{} R^{\text{ceiling}}_{\text{HB,error}} \approx \sum p(K_I) \cdot K_I {\text{log}}_2 \left\{ 1+ \frac{1}{{\text{LB}}} \right\}

where ‘LB’ represents the lower bound of E_{\Delta {\bf{h}}_{\text{eq},k_I}}[x_{k_I}] given in (1). Formula (1) shows that the achievable sum rate is limited to a ceiling only determined by the variance of phase-shifting error and gain error of phase shifters.

Remark

Remark 1

8L6K

In this paper, we focus on the ZF digital precoder at the BS and analyze the performance loss with imperfect phase shifters. Other digital precoders like regularized ZF (RZF) which can further improve the performance in the low SNR regime can be analyzed by the similar procedure. The RZF digital precoder can be expressed as [RZF]

{\bf{F}}_{\text{BB,RZF}} = {\bf{H}}_{\text{eq}}^* ({\bf{H}}_{\text{eq}} {\bf{H}}_{\text{eq}}^* + K_I\frac{ \sigma^2_z}{\rho} {\bf{I}}_{K_I})^{-1}

where the transmission power normalization factor \eta_{\text{RZF}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{{\bf{F}}_{\text{BB,RZF}}{\bf{F}}_{\text{BB,RZF}}^*}}. It is easy to prove that \eta^2 E_{\Delta {\bf{h}}_{\text{eq},k_I}}[x_{k_I}] is equal applying RZF and ZF digital precoder with the same analytic procedure. Thus the loss of the achievable sum rate caused by phase-shifting error and gain error is nearly the same with RZF or ZF precoder. While \eta_{\text{RZF}} > \eta_{\text{ZF}} thus the achievable sum rate will be improved with RZF precoder especially in the low SNR regime.

Remark

Remark 2

GL63

When the number of users communicating to the BS simultaneously is large, the user scheduling scheme will not be optimal of course. Some hybrid beamforming algorithms will achieve higher sum rate such as the exhaustive search among large enough amount of candidate analog beamforming vectors with the strategy of maximizing the sum rate. In these cases, the analytic procedure is also applicable, as well as the derived lower bound. In fact as long as the digital precoder is the linear precoder such as maximum ratio transmission (MRT), ZF, RZF, the similar analytic procedure can be used to different analog beamforming algorithms. For other digital precoder design such as block diagonalization (BD), we will leave it to the future research.

Remark

Remark 3

5652

In the AOD estimation stage, if the analog beamforming matrix is

{\bf{F}}_{\text{RF,P}} = \left( \begin{array}{c} \sqrt{\frac{K}{N_{\text{BS}}}} {\bf{U}}_{K \times K} \\ {\bf{0}}_{(N_{\text{BS}}-K) \times K}\\ \end{array} \right)

the accuracy of AOD estimation will be greatly improved with the existence of phase-shifting error and gain error. However the elements ‘0’ can not be realized by phase shifters. Considering the hardware structure in [SWITCH_AND_PS] where each phase shifter is followed by a switch, we can realize the elements ‘0’ by turning off the switch. This may cause extra hardware cost but it can use less training cycles and less phase shifters to achieve the same performance, which may consume less power.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1803.00317v3 by Wendi Wang, Huarui Yin, Xiaohui Chen and Weidong Wang, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1803/1803.00317.jsonl.