arXiv reader

The Pseudo-Lindley Alpha Power transformed distribution, mathematical characterizations and asymptotic properties

Modou Ngom, Moumouni Diallo, Adja Mbarka Fall and Gane Samb Lo

arXiv
2201.07292v1 · PDF · 18 January 2022
Categories
math.ST, stat.TH
Licence
CC BY SA 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We introduce a new generalization of the Pseudo-Lindley distribution by applying alpha power transformation. The obtained distribution is referred as the Pseudo-Lindley alpha power transformed distribution (PL-APT). Some tractable mathematical properties of the PL-APT distribution as reliability, hazard rate, order statistics and entropies are provided. The maximum likelihood method is used to obtain the parameters’ estimation of the PL-APT distribution. The asymptotic properties of the proposed distribution are discussed. Also, a simulation study is performed to compare the modeling capability and flexibility of PL-APT with Lindley and Pseudo-Lindley distributions. The PL-APT provides a good fit as the Lindley and the Pseudo-Lindley distribution. The extremal domain of attraction of PL-APT is found and its quantile and extremal quantile functions studied. Finally, the extremal value index is estimated by the double-indexed Hill’s estimator (Ngom and Lo, 2016) and related asymptotic statistical tests are provided and characterized.

Items 2

Theorem

Theorem 1

9MTM

We have

(a) If the following conditions \frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\rightarrow 0 and B_{n}\left( f,s\right) \rightarrow 0 hold as n\rightarrow +\infty , then

\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\left[ M_{n}\left( f,s\right) -\gamma ^{s}\right] \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{N} \left( 0,\gamma ^{2s}\right) .

(b) Furthermore, if

\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\rightarrow +\infty

then

\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\left[ M_{n}\left( f,s\right) -\gamma ^{s}\right] \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{N} \left( 0,\gamma ^{2s}C^{2}\left( s\right) \right) .
Proof of Theorem 1

Here, we establish the proof of Theorem ?.

As the cdf G_{\alpha} of the PL-APT belongs to the attraction domain of Gumbel, it is known that to estimate the extremal index it is equivalent to use in the calculus the G_{\alpha}^{-1}(1-u) or \log G_{\alpha}^{-1}(1-u).

Let

\begin{aligned} R_{j,n} &=f(j)\left( \log X_{n-j+1,n}-\log X_{n-j,n}\right) ^{s} \\ &=f(j)\left( G_{\alpha}^{-1}\left( 1-U_{j,n}\right) - G_{\alpha}^{-1}\left( 1-U_{j+1,n}\right) \right) ^{s} \\ &=f(j)\left( (1/\theta) \log \left( \frac{U_{j+1,n}}{U_{j,n}}\right) +C_{2}A_{n}+O_{ \mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) \right) ^{s} \\ &=f(j)\left( (1/\theta)j^{-1}E_{j,n}+C_{2}A_{n}+O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) \right) ^{s} \end{aligned}

with

A_{n}=\max \left\{ U_{j,n}^{2};U_{j+1,n}^{2}\right\} \leq -2\log \left( \frac{U_{j+1,n}}{U_{j,n}}\right)

and

O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) =O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( \left( \log n\right) ^{-2}\right).

By the mean value theorem and j\in \left\{ 1,...,k\left( n\right) \right\} , s>1, we get

\begin{aligned} & & \\ & & R_{j,n}-(1/\theta)^{s}f(j)j^{-s}E_{j,n}^{s} \\ &\leq &sf(j)\left\vert C_{2}A_{n}+O_{ \mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) \right\vert \left( (1/\theta)j^{-1}E_{j,n}+\left\vert C_{2}A_{n}\right\vert +\left\vert O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) \right\vert \right) ^{s-1} \\ &\leq & (1/\theta)sf(j)j^{-1}E_{j,n}\left( (1/\theta)j^{-1}E_{j,n}+\left\vert C_{2}A_{n}\right\vert +\left\vert O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( B_{n}\right) \right\vert \right) ^{s-1} \\ &\leq &(1/\theta)sf(j)j^{-1}E_{j,n}\left( D_{s}(1/\theta)^{s-1}j^{s-1}E_{j,n}^{s-1}+(1/\theta)D_{s}^{2}j^{-1}E_{j,n}+O_{\mathbb{P} }\left( \frac{D_{s}^{2}}{\left( \log n\right) ^{-2}}\right) \right) . \end{aligned}

Applying the sum , we get

\begin{aligned} & & \\ & & \sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }\left( R_{j,n}-(1/\theta)^{s}f(j)j^{-s}E_{j,n}^{s}\right) \\ &\leq &(1/\theta)s\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }f(j)j^{-1}E_{j,n}\left( D_{s}(1/\theta)^{s-1}j^{s-1}E_{j,n}^{s-1}+(1/\theta)D_{s}^{2}j^{-1}E_{j,n}+O_{\mathbb{P} }\left( \frac{D_{s}^{2}}{\left( \log n\right) ^{-2}}\right) \right) \\ \end{aligned}

and

\begin{aligned} & & \\ & & \sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }R_{j,n}-(1/\theta)^{s}\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }f(j)j^{-s}E_{j,n}^{s} \\ &\leq & (1/\theta)s\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }f(j)j^{-1}E_{j,n}\left( D_{s}(1/\theta)^{s-1}j^{s-1}E_{j,n}^{s-1}+(1/\theta)D_{s}^{2}j^{-1}E_{j,n}+O_{\mathbb{P} }\left( \frac{D_{s}^{2}}{\left( \log n\right) ^{-2}}\right) \right) \\ \end{aligned}
\begin{aligned} & & \left\vert T_{n}\left( f,s\right) -(1/\theta)^{s}S_{n}\left( f,s\right) \right\vert \\ &\leq &(1/\theta)sS_{n}\left( f,1\right) \left( D_{s}(1/\theta)^{s-1}S_{n}\left( f,s-1\right) +(1/\theta)D_{s}^{2}S_{n}\left( f,1\right) +O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( \frac{D_{s}^{2}}{ \left( \log n\right) ^{-2}}\right) \right) \text{ (IL)} \end{aligned}

where

S_{n}\left( f,s\right) =\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }f(j)j^{-s}E_{j,n}^{s}

and

T_{n}\left( f,s\right) =\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }f(j)\left( \log X_{n-j+1,n}-\log X_{n-j,n}\right) ^{s}.

The random variable S_{n}\left( f,s\right) is a sequence of partial sum of random real values and independent random variables indexed by j\in \left\{ 1,...,k\left( n\right) \right\} with first and second moments

\mu _{1}=\Gamma \left( s+1\right) f\left( j\right) j^{-s}\text{ \ and \ }\mu _{2}=\left( \text{\ }\Gamma \left( 2s+1\right) -\Gamma \left( s+1\right) ^{2}\right) f\left( j\right) j^{-s}.

Its asymptotic normality is given as follows by using the Levy-Feller-Linderberg (see [ips-mfpt-ang], Theorem 20),

\left( \frac{1}{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }\left( f(j)j^{-s}\left( E_{j,n}^{s}-\text{\ }\Gamma \left( s+1\right) \right) \right) \leadsto \mathcal{N}\left( 0,1\right) \right)

\text{ \ and } B_{n}\left( f,s\right) \longrightarrow 0\text{ as }n\longrightarrow +\infty,

where

B_{n}\left( f,s\right) =\frac{1}{C\left( s\right) }\left\{ \frac{\mathbb{V} ar\left( f(j)j^{-s}\left( E_{j,n}^{s}-\text{\ }\Gamma \left( s+1\right) \right) \right) }{\sum_{j=1}^{k\left( n\right) }\mathbb{V}ar\left( f(j)j^{-s}\left( E_{j,n}^{s}-\text{\ }\Gamma \left( s+1\right) \right) \right) }\right\} .

By combining the Lindeberg condition, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the central limit theorem, we get for S_{n}\left( f,s\right) the result below

\frac{S_{n}\left( f,s\right) -(1/\theta)^{s}a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\leadsto \mathcal{N}\left( 0,1\right) .

The continuation of the inequality (IL) implies

\begin{aligned} \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) -(1/\theta)^{s}S_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }-\frac{S_{n}\left( f,s\right) -(1/\theta)^{s}a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{ s_{n}\left( f,s\right) } &\leq &O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( \frac{S_{n}\left( f,1\right) }{S_{n}\left( f,s\right) \log n}\right) \\ \end{aligned}
\begin{aligned} \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) -S_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }-\frac{(1/\theta)^{s}\left( S_{n}\left( f,s\right) -a_{n}\left( f,s\right) \right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) } &\leq &O_{\mathbb{P}}\left( \frac{S_{n}\left( f,1\right) }{S_{n}\left( f,s\right) \log n}\right). (IL1) \end{aligned}

The right hand side of the inequality (IL1) above tends to zero in probability if and only if

\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{S_{n}\left( f,1\right) }{S_{n}\left( f,s\right) \log n}\right) \longrightarrow 0 \ \ \ as \ \ \ n \longrightarrow +\infty . \end{aligned}

Let

M_{n}\left( f,s\right) =\left( \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\right) ^{1/s}.

By combining the results above for the left hand side of the inequality (IL1) above, we arrive at

\frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) -(1/\theta)^{s}S_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }=\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\left[ \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }-(1/\theta)^{s}\right].

So, we have

\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\left[ \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }-(1/\theta)^{s}\right] = Z_{n}+O_{\mathbb{P}}(1).

If a_{n}\left( f,s\right) / s_{n}\left( f,s\right) \longrightarrow +\infty, then we have by using the delta method applied to g(t)=t^{1/s} ,

\frac{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{s_{n}\left( f,s\right) }\left[ \frac{T_{n}\left( f,s\right) }{a_{n}\left( f,s\right) }-(1/\theta)^{s}\right] \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{N} \left(0,(1/\theta)^{2s}C^{2}(s) \right).

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2201.07292v1 by Modou Ngom, Moumouni Diallo, Adja Mbarka Fall and Gane Samb Lo, under the licence CC BY SA 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY SA 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2201/2201.07292.jsonl.