A novel comparison framework for epidemiological strategies applied to age-based restrictions versus horizontal lockdowns
Vasiliki Bitsouni, Nikolaos Gialelis and Vasilis Tsilidis
- arXiv
- 2312.01517v2 · PDF · 17 July 2024
- Categories
- math.DS, q-bio.PE
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.
Abstract
During an epidemic, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, policy-makers are faced with the decision of implementing effective, yet socioeconomically costly intervention strategies, such as school and workplace closure, physical distancing, etc. In this study, we propose a rigorous definition of epidemiological strategies. In addition, we develop a scheme for comparing certain epidemiological strategies, with the goal of providing policy-makers with a tool for their systematic comparison. Then, we put the suggested scheme to the test by employing an age-based epidemiological compartment model introduced in Bitsouni et al. (2024), coupled with data from the literature, in order to compare the effectiveness of age-based and horizontal interventions. In general, our findings suggest that these two are comparable, mainly at a low or medium level of intensity.
Items 11
Let \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)}.
A set S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)}\subseteq F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} is called strategy (of \mathscr{P}) with respect to \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right) iff
\forall \pmb{y}\in S\text{ }\exists\pmb{r}=\pmb{r}{\left(\,\cdot\,;\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)}\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathbb{R}^{n_1+n_2}\right)}\text{ s.t. }\pmb{y}=\pmb{r}\odot\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),
where \odot stands for the Hadamard product.
Let
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy and
\pmb{y}\in S.
A function \pmb{r}\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathbb{R}^{n_1+n_2}\right)} as in 1. is called strategic scale of \pmb{y}.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)},
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy and
S_0\subseteq S.
Then S_0 is a strategy with respect to \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right).
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)},
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy and
S_0\subseteq S.
We call S_0 a substrategy of S.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)},
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy and
S_0\subseteq S.
We name the following substrategies.
Let i\in\left\{1,\dots,m\right\}. S_0 is called horizontal with respect to x_i iff
\pmb{r}{\left(\pmb{x};\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)}=\pmb{r}{\left(x_1,\dots,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\dots,x_m;\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)},\text{ }\forall\pmb{x}\in\mathcal{X},\text{ }\forall\pmb{y}\in S_0,
i.e., \forall\pmb{y}\in S_0 a respective strategic scale is independent of x_i, otherwise we call it x_i-based.
S_0 is called horizontal, iff it is horizontal with respect to x_i, \forall i\in\left\{1,\dots,m\right\}.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} and
{\left\{S_j=S_j{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)}\right\}}_{j\in\mathcal{J}} be a family of respective strategies.
Then \bigcup\limits_{j\in\mathcal{J}}{S_j} is a strategy with respect to \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right).
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} and
\mathcal{S} be the family of all the respective strategies.
We call
\hat{S}=\hat{S}{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)}=\bigcup\limits_{S\in\mathcal{S}}{S}
the largest strategy with respect to \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right).
Let \left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)}. If
\left(\underbrace{0,\dots,0}_{\#\text{ }n_1+n_2}\right)\nin\left(\pmb{\beta}_0{\left(\mathcal{X}\right)},\pmb{\gamma}_0{\left(\mathcal{X}\right)}\right),
then
\forall\pmb{y}\in \hat{S}\text{ }\exists!\text{ strategic scale of }\pmb{y}.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} satisfy (3) and
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy.
We call the function
S\ni\pmb{y}\mapsto\pmb{r}{\left(\,\cdot\,;\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)}\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathbb{R}^{n_1+n_2}\right)}
the strategic scale of S.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} satisfy (3),
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy,
\mathfrak{P}_j, \forall j\in\left\{1,2\right\} be mathematical statements with respect to the strategic scale of S such that \mathfrak{P}_1\Rightarrow\mathfrak{P}_2 and
S_j\subseteq S, \forall j\in\left\{1,2,3\right\}, be substrategies of S such that
S_j=\left\{\pmb{y}\in S\,\big|\,\mathfrak{P}_i{\left(\pmb{r}{\left(\,\cdot\,;\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)}\right)}\right\},\text{ }\forall j\in\left\{1,2\right\}\text{ \& }S_3=\left\{\pmb{y}\in S\,\big|\,\neg\mathfrak{P}_1{\left(\pmb{r}{\left(\,\cdot\,;\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right),\pmb{y}\right)}\right)}\right\}.
Then
S_1\subseteq S_2 and
S_3=S\setminus S_1.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} satisfy (3) and
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective strategy.
We call S gradable iff \forall\pmb{\delta}\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{other}}\right)} the function \left.\mathcal{R}_0\right|_S{\left(\,\cdot\,,\pmb{\delta}\right)} is injective.
Let
\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{tr},\mathrm{r}}\right)} satisfy (3),
S=S{\left(\pmb{\beta}_0,\pmb{\gamma}_0\right)} be a respective gradable strategy,
\pmb{\delta}\in F{\left(\mathcal{X};\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{other}}\right)} and
{\left\{\pmb{y}_i\right\}}_{i=1}^k\subseteq S be a family of pairwise distinct elements of S, such that
\underbrace{\mathcal{R}_0{\left(\pmb{y}_1,\pmb{\delta}\right)}}_{\eqqcolon G_1}<\dots<\underbrace{\mathcal{R}_0{\left(\pmb{y}_k,\pmb{\delta}\right)}}_{\eqqcolon G_k}.
We call the pair \left(S,\pmb{G}={\left(G_i\right)}_{i=1}^k\right) a graded strategy, while \pmb{G} is called a gradation of S and each of the G_1,\dots,G_k is called a grade of \pmb{G}.
Source and licence
The text on this page is from arXiv:2312.01517v2 by Vasiliki Bitsouni, Nikolaos Gialelis and Vasilis Tsilidis, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2312/2312.01517.jsonl.