arXiv reader

Arithmetic Functions and Geometry

Andrew Kobin

arXiv
2504.13328v2 · PDF · 1 May 2025
Categories
math.NT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

In this expository note, we revisit several classical arithmetic functions - namely Euler’s totient function, the divisor sum functions and Dedekind’s \psi-function - within a unifying algebraic framework that highlights their connections to geometry. This framework builds on prior work involving zeta functions and Möbius inversion. While our main goal is to provide a clear context for similar constructions in the future, we also make an original observation regarding Dedekind’s \psi-function.

Items 45

Remark

Remark 1.1

NKVR

As an amusing sidenote, the other famous mathematical object named for August Ferdinand Möbius, the Möbius strip, is also a configuration space: \ensuremath{\operatorname{Conf}}^{2}(S^{1}).

Proposition

Proposition 2.1

UOP4

As formal Dirichlet series,

\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\phi(n)}{n^{s}} = \frac{\zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s - 1)}{\zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s)}.
Proof of Proposition 2.1

By Dirichlet convolution,

\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\phi(n)}{n^{s}} = \left (\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{n}{n^{s}}\right )\left (\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\mu(n)}{n^{s}}\right ) = \zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s - 1)\mu_{\mathbb{Q}}(s) = \zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s - 1)\zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s)^{-1}.
Definition

Definition 2.2

U5Y2

The totient function of a number field K/\mathbb{Q} is the function \phi_{K} : I_{K}^{+}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\phi_{K}(\frak{a}) = \#(\mathcal{O}_{K}/\frak{a})^{\times}.
Proposition

Proposition 2.3

FGKY

For any ideal \frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+},

N(\frak{a}) = \sum_{\frak{d}\mid\frak{a}} \phi_{K}(\frak{d})

where the sum runs over all ideals \frak{d} dividing \frak{a}. In other words, N = \phi_{K}*\zeta where \zeta(\frak{a}) = 1 is the zeta function for I_{K}^{+}.

Proof of Proposition 2.3

By formula (?),

\phi_{K}(\frak{a}) = N(\frak{a})\prod_{\frak{p}\mid\frak{a}} \left (1 - \frac{1}{N(\frak{p})}\right ) = N(\frak{a})\sum_{\frak{d}\mid\frak{a}} \frac{\mu(\frak{d})}{N(\frak{d})} = \sum_{\frak{d}\mid\frak{a}} \mu(\frak{d})N(\frak{ad}^{-1}).

This can be rewritten

\phi_{K}(\frak{a}) = \sum_{\frak{d}\mid\frak{a}} N(\frak{d})\mu(\frak{ad}^{-1})

i.e. \phi_{K} = N*\mu. Then Möbius inversion gives the desired formula.

Remark

Remark 2.4

QF25

We could have proved formula (?) for the classical totient function this way too, i.e. by first proving formula (?) directly using the above argument and then applying Möbius inversion.

Proposition

Proposition 2.5

H971

As formal Dirichlet series,

\sum_{\frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+}} \frac{\phi_{K}(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \frac{\zeta_{K}(s - 1)}{\zeta_{K}(s)}.
Proof of Proposition 2.5

Since \phi_{K} = N*\mu, we get

\sum_{\frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+}} \frac{\phi_{K}(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \left (\sum_{\frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+}} \frac{N(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}}\right )\left (\sum_{\frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+}} \frac{\mu(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}}\right ) = \zeta_{K}(s - 1)\mu_{K}(s) = \zeta_{K}(s - 1)\zeta_{K}(s)^{-1}.
Definition

Definition 2.6

2WDZ

The totient function of a variety X/\mathbb{F}_{q} is the function \phi_{X} : Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\phi_{X}(\alpha) = \#(\mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}/I_{\alpha})^{\times}.
Proposition

Proposition 2.7

OKET

For any effective 0-cycle \alpha on X,

q^{\deg(\alpha)} = \sum_{\beta\leq\alpha} \phi_{X}(\beta).

In other words, \pi = \phi_{X}*\zeta, where \zeta(\alpha) = 1 is the zeta function for Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X) and \pi = q^{\deg(-)}.

Proof of Proposition 2.7

Write \alpha = \sum_{i = 1}^{r} a_{i}x_{i}. By formula (?),

\phi_{X}(\alpha) = q^{\deg(\alpha)}\prod_{i = 1}^{r} (1 - q^{-\deg(x_{i})}) = q^{\deg(\alpha)}\sum_{\beta\leq\alpha} \mu(\beta)q^{-\deg(\beta)} = \sum_{\beta\leq\alpha} \mu(\beta)q^{\deg(\alpha - \beta)}

where \mu is the Möbius function for Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X). This can be rewritten

\phi_{X}(\alpha) = \sum_{\beta\leq\alpha} \mu(\beta)q^{\deg(\alpha - \beta)} = \sum_{\beta\leq\alpha} q^{\deg(\beta)}\mu(\alpha - \beta).

Or in other words, \phi_{X} = \pi*\mu. Then Möbius inversion for Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X) implies that \pi = \phi_{X}*\zeta as claimed.

Proposition

Proposition 2.8

0NT5

For any variety X over a finite field,

\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} \phi_{X}(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)} = \frac{Z(X\times\mathbb{A}^{1},t)}{Z(X,t)}.
Proof of Proposition 2.8

Translating the identity \phi_{X} = \pi*\mu to power series produces

\begin{aligned} \sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} \phi_{X}(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)} &= \left (\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} q^{\deg(\alpha)}t^{\deg(\alpha)}\right )\left (\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} \mu(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)}\right )\\ &= \left (\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} (qt)^{\deg(\alpha)}\right )Z(X,t)^{-1} = Z(X,qt)Z(X,t)^{-1}. \end{aligned}

It is well-known that Z(X,qt) = Z(X\times\mathbb{A}^{1},t), so the claimed formula holds.

Remark

Remark 2.9

ITYA

Thinking motivically, we can see formula (?) and its various special cases (Propositions 2.1, 2.5 and 2.8) as shadows of the identity [\mathbb{A}^{1}] = [\mathbb{G}_{m}] + [\text{point}] in the Grothendieck ring of \mathbb{Z}-schemes (resp. \mathcal{O}_{K}-schemes, \mathbb{F}_{q}-varieties).

Proposition

Proposition 2.10

3FLI

Let K/\mathbb{Q} be a number field with ring of integers \mathcal{O}_{K}. For any \alpha\in\mathcal{O}_{K} and ideal \frak{b} such that \alpha\mathcal{O}_{K} and \frak{b} are relatively prime,

\alpha^{\phi_{K}(\frak{b})} \equiv 1\pmod{\frak{b}}.
Proposition

Proposition 2.11

XFH2

Let X/\mathbb{F}_{q} be a variety, U\subseteq X an open subset and f\in\mathcal{O}_{X}(U). Then for any effective 0-cycle \beta\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X) with support outside V(f) = \{x\in U\mid f(x) = 0\},

f^{\phi_{X}(\beta)} \equiv 1\pmod{I_{\beta}}

in the semilocal ring \mathcal{O}_{X,\beta}.

Corollary

Corollary 2.12

S7S6

Let k be a finite field, g\in k[t] and D = \ensuremath{\operatorname{div}}_{0}(g) the effective divisor of zeroes of g. Then

  1. \phi_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(D) = \#\{f\in k[t]\mid \deg(f) < \deg(g) \text{ and } \gcd(f,g) = 1\}.

  2. For any such f\in k[t],

    f^{\phi_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(D)} \equiv 1\pmod{g}

    holds in k[t].

Proof of Corollary 2.12

Both statements follow from setting X = \mathbb{P}^{1}, U = \mathbb{P}^{1}\smallsetminus\{\infty\} \cong \mathbb{A}^{1}, identifying the rings \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1},D} \cong k[t]/(g) and taking cardinalities of multiplicative groups of units.

Definition

Definition 3.1

8PZR

The first divisor sum of a number field K/\mathbb{Q} is the arithmetic function \sigma_{1,K} : I_{K}^{\times}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\sigma_{1,K}(\frak{a}) = \#\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathcal{O}_{K}/\frak{a}).
Proposition

Proposition 3.2

VN3A

As formal Dirichlet series,

\sum_{\frak{a}\in I_{K}^{+}} \frac{\sigma_{1,K}(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \zeta_{K}(s)\zeta_{K}(s - 1).
Definition

Definition 3.3

CYWG

The first divisor sum of a variety X/\mathbb{F}_{q} is the function \sigma_{1,X} : Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\sigma_{1,X}(\alpha) = \#\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}/I_{\alpha}).
Proposition

Proposition 3.4

S62D

For any variety X/\mathbb{F}_{q},

\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} \sigma_{1,K}(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)} = Z(X,t)Z(X\times\mathbb{A}^{1},t).
Definition

Definition 3.5

OWEP

For an arithmetic scheme X, the global first divisor sum of X is the formal power series

S_{1,X}(s) = \prod_{p\text{ prime}} S_{1}(X_{p},p^{-s})

where for each prime p,

S_{1}(X_{p},t) = \sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X_{p})} \sigma_{1,X_{p}}(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)}.
Corollary

Corollary 3.6

4HIE

For any arithmetic scheme X, we have

S_{1,X}(s) = \zeta_{X}(s)\zeta_{X}(s - 1).
Remark

Remark 3.7

I2AQ

As in Remark 2.9, we can view the formulas above as shadows of the formula [\mathbb{P}^{1}] = [\mathbb{A}^{1}] + [\text{point}] in the appropriate Grothendieck ring. Further, formula (?) also suggests generalizing the divisor sum functions \sigma_{m}(n) by \sigma_{m,X}(z) = \#(\mathcal{O}/z)^{m} + 1 for each choice of object X, ring \mathcal{O} and monoid Z with z\in Z. That is, a divisor sum function is a shadow of a class of the form [\mathbb{A}^{m}] + [\text{point}] in some Grothendieck ring.

Definition

Definition 4.1

ORVV

Dedekind’s \psi-function is the arithmetic function \psi : \mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{C} defined by

\psi(n) = n\prod_{p\mid n} \left (1 + \frac{1}{p}\right ).
Lemma

Lemma 4.2

4WTD

\#G(p^{k}) = \psi(p^{k}).

Proof of Lemma 4.2

This follows from standard formulas for \#\mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{q}) and \#\mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{q})^{\times}. For more details, see [kzb].

Question

Question 4.4

6VGM

Is there a group scheme \mathcal{G}/\ensuremath{\operatorname{Spec}}\mathbb{Z} such that G(n) \cong \mathcal{G}(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}) for all n? For example, is there an interpretation of the groups G(n) in terms of the ring of big Witt vectors?

Definition

Definition 4.5

JM1A

The \psi-function of a number field K/\mathbb{Q} is the function \psi_{K} : I_{K}^{\times}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\psi_{K}(\frak{a}) = N(\frak{a})\prod_{\frak{p}\mid\frak{a}} \left (1 + \frac{1}{N(\frak{p})}\right ).
Proposition

Proposition 4.6

1CMT

Let \frak{a},\frak{b},\frak{p}\subset\mathcal{O}_{K} be ideals, with \frak{p} prime. Then

  1. If \frak{a} and \frak{b} are relatively prime, then \psi_{K}(\frak{a}\frak{b}) = \psi_{K}(\frak{a})\psi_{K}(\frak{b}).

  2. \psi_{K}(\frak{p}) = \sigma_{1,K}(\frak{p}) = N(\frak{p}) + 1. In particular, if \frak{a} is squarefree then \psi_{K}(\frak{a}) = \sigma_{1,K}(\frak{a}).

  3. As arithmetic functions on I_{K}^{\times}, \psi_{K} = N*|\mu_{K}|, where \mu_{K} is the Möbius function in I(I_{K}^{\times}).

  4. \psi(\frak{a}) = [SL_{2}(\mathcal{O}_{K}) : \Gamma_{0}(\frak{a})], where \Gamma_{0}(\frak{a}) is the subgroup of matrices in SL_{2}(\mathcal{O}_{K}) which are upper triangular mod \frak{a}.

  5. \psi_{K}(\frak{a}) = \#G(\frak{a}) where

    G(\frak{a}) := \prod_{\frak{p}^{k}\mid\mid\frak{a}} G(\frak{p}^{k}) := \prod_{\frak{p}^{k}\mid\mid\frak{a}} \mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{N(\frak{p})^{2}})^{\times}/\mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{N(\frak{p})})^{\times}.
Proof of Proposition 4.6

(a) – (c) follow from the definition. (d) is proven in the usual way, i.e. by counting the number of cyclic submodules of rank N(\frak{a}) in E[\frak{a}], where E is an elliptic curve over K (equivalently, cyclic submodules in E_{tors} which are isomorphic as \mathcal{O}_{K}-modules to \mathcal{O}_{K}/\frak{a}). Finally, (e) follows from the same standard formulas as above.

Corollary

Corollary 4.7

UXPP

The Dirichlet series for \psi_{K} satisfies the formula

\sum_{\frak{a}\subset\mathcal{O}_{K}} \frac{\psi_{K}(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \frac{\zeta_{K}(s)\zeta_{K}(s - 1)}{\zeta_{K}(2s)}

where \zeta_{K}(s) is the Dedekind zeta function of K.

Proof of Corollary 4.7

This follows from (c) and the identity

\sum_{\frak{a}\subset\mathcal{O}_{K}} \frac{|\mu_{K}(\frak{a})|}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \frac{\zeta_{K}(s)}{\zeta_{K}(2s)}

which is a straightforward generalization of the same formula over \mathbb{Q}.

Definition

Definition 4.8

FOMJ

The \psi-function of a variety X/\mathbb{F}_{q} is the function \psi_{X} : Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)\rightarrow\mathbb{Z} defined by

\psi_{X}(\alpha) = q^{\deg(\alpha)}\prod_{i = 1}^{r} (1 + q^{-\deg(x_{i})}).
Proposition

Proposition 4.9

VSOO

Let \alpha,\beta\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X) and let x\in|X|. Then

  1. If \alpha and \beta are relatively prime, then \psi_{X}(\alpha + \beta) = \psi_{X}(\alpha)\psi_{X}(\beta).

  2. \psi_{X}(x) = \sigma_{1,X}(x) = q^{\deg(x)} + 1. In particular, if \alpha is a log effective 0-cycle(A log cycle is one for which each irreducible cycle appears with coefficient 1.) then \psi_{X}(\alpha) = \sigma_{1,X}(\alpha).

  3. As arithmetic functions on Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X), \psi_{X} = \pi*|\mu_{X}|, where \mu_{X} is the Möbius function in I(Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)).

  4. \psi(\alpha) = [SL_{2}(\mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}) : \Gamma_{0}(I_{\alpha})], where \Gamma_{0}(I_{\alpha}) is the subgroup of matrices in SL_{2}(\mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}) which are upper triangular mod I_{\alpha}.

  5. \psi_{X}(\alpha) = \#G(\alpha) where

    G(\alpha) := \prod_{kx\in\alpha} G(kx) := \prod_{kx\in\alpha} \mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{q^{2\deg(\alpha)}})^{\times}/\mathbb{W}_{k}(\mathbb{F}_{q^{\deg(\alpha)}})^{\times}.
Proof of Proposition 4.9

(a) – (c) and (e) are the same as in the proof of Proposition 4.6. For (e), counting sublattices in (\mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}/I_{\alpha})^{2} isomorphic to \mathcal{O}_{X,\alpha}/I_{\alpha} gives the result.

Corollary

Corollary 4.10

99J3

The power series for \psi_{X} satisfies

\sum_{\alpha\in Z_{0}^{\ensuremath{\operatorname{eff}}}(X)} \psi_{X}(\alpha)t^{\deg(\alpha)} = \frac{Z(X,t)Z(X,qt)}{Z(X,t^{2})} = \frac{Z(X,t)Z(X\times\mathbb{A}^{1},t)}{Z(X_{\mathbb{F}_{q^{2}}},t)}

where X_{\mathbb{F}_{q^{2}}} = X\times_{\ensuremath{\operatorname{Spec}}\mathbb{F}_{q}}\ensuremath{\operatorname{Spec}}\mathbb{F}_{q^{2}}.

Corollary

Corollary 4.11

N2W0

For any arithmetic scheme X, we have

\Psi_{X}(s) = \frac{\zeta_{X}(s)\zeta_{X\times\mathbb{A}^{1}}(s)}{\zeta_{X}(2s)}.
Definition

Definition 5.1

KQWT

Liouville’s \lambda-function is the arithmetic function \lambda : \mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{C} defined by \lambda(1) = 1 and

\lambda(n) = \begin{cases} 1, &\text{if $n$ is a product of an even number of primes}\\ -1, &\text{if $n$ is a product of an odd number of primes}. \end{cases}

That is, \lambda(n) = (-1)^{\Omega(n)} where \Omega\left (\prod p_{i}^{a_{i}}\right ) = \sum a_{i}.

Problem

Problem 5.2

BJNS

Extend \lambda to a number field K/\mathbb{Q} by setting

\lambda_{K}(\frak{a}) = (-1)^{\Omega(\frak{a})}

where \Omega\left (\prod \frak{p}_{i}^{a_{i}}\right ) = \sum a_{i}. Show \lambda_{K}*|\mu_{K}| = \delta in the incidence algebra I(I_{K}^{\times}), which implies

\sum_{\frak{a}\subset\mathcal{O}_{K}} \frac{\lambda_{K}(\frak{a})}{N(\frak{a})^{s}} = \frac{\zeta_{K}(2s)}{\zeta_{K}(s)}.

Repeat for a variety X/\mathbb{F}_{q} and for a scheme X/\ensuremath{\operatorname{Spec}}\mathbb{Z}.

Problem

Problem 5.3

OU2Y

If possible, find a class \xi in the Grothendieck ring of schemes such that \#\xi(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}) = \lambda(n) and similarly for each generalization of \psi in Problem 5.2.

Question

Question 5.4

16LD

Does this identity generalize to (i) number fields? (ii) higher dimensional geometric objects? (iii) a formula in some Grothendieck ring? What about formulas involving the sum of squares functions r_{k}(n) for k\geq 3?

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2504.13328v2 by Andrew Kobin, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2504/2504.13328.jsonl.