arXiv reader

The multiplicative structure on polynomial continuous valuations

Semyon Alesker

arXiv
math/0301148v3 · PDF · 22 April 2021
Categories
math.MG
Journal
Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), no. 1, 1--26
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We introduce a canonical structure of a commutative associative filtered algebra with the unit on polynomial smooth valuations, and study its properties. The induced structure on the subalgebra of translation invariant smooth valuations has especially nice properties (it is the structure of the Frobenius algebra). We also present some applications.

Items 43

Definition

Definition 0.1

V5LF

a) A function \phi :{\cal K}(V) \longrightarrow \mathbb{C} is called a valuation if for any K_1, \, K_2 \in {\cal K}(V) such that their union is also convex one has

\phi(K_1 \cup K_2)= \phi(K_1) +\phi(K_2) -\phi(K_1 \cap K_2).

b) A valuation \phi is called continuous if it is continuous with respect to the Hausdorff metric on {\cal K}(V).

Definition

Definition 0.2

4DEX

A valuation \phi is called polynomial of degree at most d if for every K\in {\cal K}(V) the function x\mapsto \phi (K+x) is a polynomial on V of degree at most d.

Example

Example 0.3

7HA5

(1) The Euler characteristic \chi is a continuous translation invariant valuation (remind that \chi(K)=1 for any convex compact set K).

(2) Let \mu be a measure on V with a polynomial density with respect to a Lebesgue measure. Fix A\in {\cal K}(V). Then

\phi(K):=\mu (K+A)

is a continuous polynomial valuation (here K+A:=\{k+a|k\in K,\, a\in A\}).

Remark

Remark 0.4

KP40

In [alesker-icm] we have announced a result that polynomial continuous valuations are dense in the space of all continuous valuations. However during the preparation of this paper we found a gap in our original argument. So we do not know if this fact is true.

Theorem

Theorem 0.5

AT3N

There exists a unique filtration W_i on PVal^{sm}(V) such that

(1) \{W_i\} is compatible with the multiplicative structure, i.e. W_i \cdot W_j \subset W_{i+j};

(2) \gamma_{i+1}\subset W_i\subset \gamma_i \mbox{ for all } i;

(3) W_0=\gamma_0,\,W_1 =\gamma_1;

(4) W_i is a closed subspace of PVal^{sm}(V);

(5) W_i is Aff (V)-invariant.

Theorem

Theorem 0.6

Z1BD

There exists a canonical isomorphism of graded algebras

gr_W (PVal^{sm}(V))\simeq Val^{sm}(V) \otimes \mathbb{C}[V]

where the ith graded term in the right hand side is equal to Val_i^{sm}(V)\otimes \mathbb{C}[V] where \mathbb{C}[V] denotes the algebra of polynomial functions on V.

Theorem

Theorem 0.7 (Irreducibility Theorem)

3PP2

The natural representations of the group GL(V) in Val_i^0(V) and Val_i^1(V) are irreducible.

Theorem

Theorem 0.8

OLQ3

The maps

(Val_i^0(V))^{sm}\to ((Val_{n-i}^{0}(V))^*)^{sm}\otimes Val_n(V), \, \mbox{ and }
(Val_i^1(V))^{sm}\to ((Val_{n-i}^{1}(V))^*)^{sm}\otimes Val_n(V)

induced by the multiplication (Val_i^0(V))^{sm}\otimes (Val_{n-i}^0(V))^{sm}\to Val_n(V) and (Val_i^1(V))^{sm}\otimes (Val_{n-i}^1(V))^{sm}\to Val_n(V), are isomorphisms.

Theorem

Theorem 0.9

W6SC

Assume that G is a compact subgroup of GL(V) acting transitively on the projective space \mathbb{P}(V).

(i)Then Val^G(V) is finite dimensional.

(ii) Val^G(V)\subset Val^{sm}(V).

(iii) Val^G(V) is a finite dimensional graded subalgebra of Val^{sm}(V) satisfying Poincaré duality:

Val^G_i(V)\otimes Val_{n-i}^G(V)\longrightarrow Val_n^G(V)=\mathbb{C}\cdot vol

is a perfect pairing. In particular h_i=h_{n-i}.

(iv) Val_1^G(V) is spanned by the intrinsic volume V_1, and Val^G_{n-1}(V) is spanned by the intrinsic volume V_{n-1} where the intrinsic volumes are taken with respect to a G-invariant Euclidean metric. Thus h_1=h_{n-1}=1.

(v) Assume in addition that -Id\in G. Then the numbers h_i satisfy the Lefschetz inequalities:

h_i\leq h_{i+1} \mbox{ for } i<n/2.
Lemma

Lemma 1.1

8QXP

{\cal G}(V)\cap PVal^{sm}(V) is dense in PVal^{sm}(V).

Lemma

Lemma 1.2

GEHY

Let \phi_1,\dots, \phi_s \in {\cal G}(V). Then there exists a linear space V', a linear imbedding f:V\hookrightarrow V', smooth measures \mu_i on V', and A_1,\dots, A_s \in {\cal K}(V') such that \phi_i(K)=\mu_i(f(K)+A_i),\, i=1,\dots ,s.

Proposition

Proposition 1.3

0JA0

(i) For \phi \in{\cal G}(V), \, \psi\in {\cal G}(W) their exterior product \phi\boxtimes \psi \in {\cal G}(V\times W) is well defined.

(ii) The exterior product is bilinear with respect to each argument.

(iii) Fix \phi \in {\cal G} (V). Then the map {\cal G} (W)\longrightarrow {\cal G} (V\times W) given by \psi\mapsto \phi \boxtimes \psi extends (uniquely) by continuity to a map CVal(V)\longrightarrow CVal(V\times W).

(iv)

(\phi \boxtimes \psi)\boxtimes \eta= \phi \boxtimes (\psi\boxtimes \eta).

(v) Let f:V\hookrightarrow V_1,\, g:W\hookrightarrow W_1 be two imbeddings. Let \phi \in {\cal G}(V_1),\, \psi\in {\cal G}(W_1). Then

(f\times g)^*(\phi\boxtimes \psi)=f^*\phi \boxtimes g^*\psi.
Proposition

Proposition 1.4

IU4A

Equipped with the above defined multiplication, {\cal G}(V) becomes an associative commutative unital algebra where the unit is the Euler characteristic \chi.

Lemma

Lemma 1.5

H39H

Let {\cal F} be a Fréchet G-module. Let S be a finite dimensional G-module. Then ({\cal F}\otimes S)^{sm}={\cal F}^{sm}\otimes S.

Theorem

Theorem 1.6 (Casselman-Wallach)

0IL8

Let G be a real reductive Lie group. Let (\rho,G,{\cal F}) and (\pi,G,{\cal G}) be continuous representations of G of moderate growth in Fréchet spaces {\cal F} and {\cal G}. Assume in addition that {\cal G} is an admissible G-module of finite length, and

{\cal F}^{sm}={\cal F},\, {\cal G}^{sm}={\cal G}.

Then any continuous morphism of G-modules f:{\cal F}\to {\cal G} has closed image.

Theorem

Theorem 1.7 (L. Schwartz kernel theorem)

0TDX

Let X_1and X_2 be compact smooth manifolds. Let {\cal E}_1 and {\cal E}_2 be smooth finite dimensional vector bundles over X_1 and X_2 respectively. Let {\cal G} be a Fréchet space. Let

B:C^\infty(X_1,{\cal E}_1)\times C^\infty(X_2,{\cal E}_2)\to {\cal G}

be a continuous bilinear map. Then there exists unique continuous linear operator

b:C^\infty(X_1\times X_2,{\cal E}_1\boxtimes {\cal E}_2)\to {\cal G}

such that b(f_1\otimes f_2)=B(f_1,f_2) for any f_i\in C^\infty(X_i,{\cal E}_i),\, i=1,2.

Proposition

Proposition 1.10

WO9Y

The multiplication

(PVal_i(V))^{sm}\otimes (PVal_j(V))^{sm}\longrightarrow (PVal_{i+j}(V))^{sm}

is continuous.

Theorem

Theorem 2.1

J55D

(i) The map (Val_i^{0}(V))^{sm}\otimes (Val_{n-i}^{0}(V))^{sm}\longrightarrow Val_n(V) is a perfect pairing. More precisely the induced map

(Val_i^{0}(V))^{sm}\longrightarrow (Val_{n-i}^{0}(V)^*)^{sm}\otimes Val_n(V)

is an isomorphism.

(ii) For 1\leq i\leq n-1, the map (Val_i^{1}(V))^{sm}\otimes (Val_{n-i}^{1}(V))^{sm}\longrightarrow Val_n(V) is a perfect pairing in the above sense.

Proposition

Proposition 2.2

HYXF

Let V be an n-dimensional Euclidean space. Let

\phi(K)=V(K[i],A_1,\dots, A_{n-i}),\, \psi(K)=V(K[n-i],B_1,\dots,B_i)

where A_p,\, B_q \in {\cal K} (V) are fixed. Then

(\phi \cdot \psi)(K)={n\choose i}^{-1}V(A_1,\dots, A_{n-i},-B_1,\dots, -B_{i}) vol(K).
Claim

Claim 2.3

TZ4A
V(K[i],A_1,\dots, A_{n-i})=(n(n-1)\dots (i+1))^{-1}\frac{\partial^{n-i}}{\partial \lambda_1 \dots \partial \lambda_{n-i}}\bigg |_{0} vol (K+\sum _{j=1}^{n-i} \lambda_j A_j).
Lemma

Lemma 2.4

FXJF

Let X=Y\oplus Z be an orthogonal decomposition of a Euclidean space X. Let \dim X=N,\, \dim Y=n. Let M\in {\cal K}(Y),\, A_1,\dots A_{N-n}\in {\cal K}(X). Then

V_N(M[n]; A_1,\dots A_{N-n})={N\choose n}^{-1} vol_n(M)V_{N-n}(Pr_ZA_1,\dots ,Pr_ZA_{N-n})

where Pr_Z denotes the orthogonal projection onto Z.

Lemma

Lemma 2.5

4O16

The multiplication

(Val^{\varepsilon}_1(V))^{sm}\otimes (Val^{\varepsilon}_1(V))^{sm}\longrightarrow (Val^{0}_{2}(V))^{sm}

is non-zero for \varepsilon\in \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} and hence has a dense image.

Theorem

Theorem 2.6

ER63

There exists an isomorphism of graded algebras \mathbb{C}[x]/(x^{n+1}) \simeq Val^{O(n)}(V) given by x\mapsto V_1.

Lemma

Lemma 3.1

OI8L

For any d

W_i(PVal_d^{sm})\cap Val^{sm}(V)=Val_i^{sm}(V)\oplus Val_{i+1}^{sm}(V)\oplus \dots \oplus Val_n^{sm}(V).
Proposition

Proposition 3.4

SE4U

Let \phi \in PVal_d^{sm}. If \phi \in W_i( PVal_{d'}^{sm}) for some d'\geq d then

\lim_{r\longrightarrow +0} \frac{1}{r^{i-1}}\phi(rK+x)=0 \, \forall x\in X,\, \forall K\in {\cal K} (V).\eqno{(\star)}

Conversely if the condition (\star) holds then \phi \in W_i(PVal_d^{sm}).

Corollary

Corollary 3.5

DXO6

(i) For d'>d W_i(PVal_{d'}^{sm})\cap PVal_d^{sm}=W_i(PVal_d^{sm}).

(ii) Let f:U\longrightarrow V be an injective imbedding of linear spaces. Then f^*(W_i(PVal_d^{sm}(V)))\subset W_i(PVal_d^{sm}(U)).

Theorem

Theorem 3.6

UDIO
W_{i_1}(PVal_{d_1}^{sm})\otimes W_{i_2}(PVal_{d_2}^{sm})\subset W_{i_1+i_2}(PVal_{d_1 +d_2}^{sm}).
Proposition

Proposition 3.7

D2FR

(i) For any i

\gamma_{i+1}\subset W_i\subset \gamma_i.

(ii) W_1=\gamma_1.

Theorem

Theorem 3.8

EUKP

Assume that we have another filtration \{\tilde W_i\} on PVal^{sm} such that

(1) \{\tilde W_i\} is compatible with the multiplicative structure, i.e. \tilde W_i \cdot \tilde W_j \subset \tilde W_{i+j};

(2) \gamma_{i+1}\subset \tilde W_i\subset \gamma_i \mbox{ for all } i.

(3) \tilde W_0=\gamma_0,\,\tilde W_1 =\gamma_1;

(4) \tilde W_i\cap PVal_d^{sm} is a closed subspace of PVal_d^{sm} for all i,\, d.

(5) \tilde W_i is Aff (V)-invariant.

Then \tilde W_i=W_i.

Theorem

Theorem 3.9

ZGAV

There exists a canonical isomorphism of graded algebras

gr_W (PVal^{sm}(V))\simeq Val^{sm}(V) \otimes \mathbb{C}[V]

where the ith graded term in the right side is equal to Val_i^{sm}(V)\otimes \mathbb{C}[V] where \mathbb{C}[V] denote the algebra of polynomial functions on V.

Proposition

Proposition 4.1

ZWWW

The graded algebra Val^{O(\infty)}= Val^{SO(\infty)} is isomorphic to the graded algebra of polynomials in one variable \mathbb{C}[x] with the grading given by the degree of a polynomial.

Lemma

Lemma 4.2

VIA5

Let i_n:\mathbb{C}^n\hookrightarrow \mathbb{C}^{n+1} be the standard Hermitian imbedding such that the last coordinate vanishes. For any k the restriction map i_n^*: Val_k^{U(n+1)}(\mathbb{C}^{n+1})\longrightarrow Val_k^{U(n)}(\mathbb{C}^n) is an isomorphism provided n\geq k.

Definition

Definition A.1

ZOVV

Let (\pi,G,V) be a smooth representation of G in a Fréchet space V (namely V^{sm}=V). One says that this representation has moderate growth if for each continuous semi-norm \lambda on V there exists a continuous semi-norm \nu_\lambda on V and d_{\lambda}\in \mathbb{R} such that

\lambda(\pi(g)v)\leq ||g||^{d_\lambda}\nu_{\lambda}(v)

for g\in G,\, v\in V.

Lemma

Lemma A.2

Y9JU

(i) If (\pi,G,H) is a continuous representation of G in a Banach space H then (\pi,G,H^{sm}) has moderate growth.

(ii) If (\pi, G,V) is a representation of moderate growth. Let W be a closed G-invariant subspace of V. Then W and V/W have moderate growth.

Lemma

Lemma A.3

ZOUO

Let G_1 be a closed reductive subgroup of a reductive group G. Assume that the image of G_1 in GL(N,\mathbb{R}) under the map p:G\hookrightarrow GL(N,\mathbb{R}) is closed under the transposition. Let (\pi,G,H) has moderate growth. Then the restriction of this representation to G_1 also has moderate growth.

Proposition

Proposition A.6

WM74

In the notation of Section 1, the space \Omega_d^n\otimes C^\infty((\mathbb{P}_+(V^*))^k,L^{\boxtimes k}) has moderate growth as GL(V)-module.

Proposition

Proposition A.7

C9ST

Let the group GL(V) act transitively on compact smooth manifolds X_1,\dots,X_k. Let {\cal E}_i be a finite dimensional GL(V)-equivariant vector bundle over X_i, i=1,\dots,k. Then the space C^\infty(X_1\times \dots \times X_k, {\cal E}_1\times \dots\times {\cal E}_k) has moderate growth as GL(V)-module.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:math/0301148v3 by Semyon Alesker, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/0301/math-0301148.jsonl.