arXiv reader

Notes on Perverse Sheaves and Vanishing Cycles

David B. Massey

arXiv
math/9908107v14 · PDF · 10 October 2026
Categories
math.AG
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

A working mathematician’s summary of many results on the derived category, perverse sheaves, and vanishing cycles. This is the August 2025 version, with a completely revised section on vanishing cycles.

Items 5

Warning

Warning

L8YX

While morphisms of complexes which induce isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves become isomorphisms in the derived category, there are morphisms of complexes which induce the zero map on cohomology sheaves but are not zero in the derived category. The easiest example of such a morphism is given by the following.

Definition

Definition

IJBM

Let X be a complex analytic space (not necessarily pure-dimensional). Then, {\mathbf P^\bullet} \in \mathbf D_c^b(X) is perverse provided that for all i:

Warning

Warning

1KE4

The stalk cohomology of kernels, cokernels, and images in the perverse category do not correspond in any simple way to kernels, cokernels, and images of the stalk cohomology. In fact, the easiest example of this phenomenon is essentially our example from the warning in Section 1.

Theorem

Theorem

QER7

The graded pieces {\operatorname{Gr}}^i\psi_f[-1]{\mathbf I^\bullet} are semisimple in {\operatorname{Perv}}(f^{-1}(0)), i.e., they are direct sums of intersection cohomology complexes.

Theorem

Theorem (Sebastiani-Thom Isomorphism)

Q4XP

There is a natural isomorphism

k^*\phi_{{}_{f\boxplus g}}[-1]\big({\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ }{\mathbf B^\bullet}\big)\ \cong\ \phi_{{}_f}[-1]{\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ } \phi_{{}_g}[-1]{\mathbf B^\bullet},

and this isomorphism commutes with the corresponding monodromies.

Moreover, if we let \mathbf p:=(\mathbf x, \mathbf y)\in X\times Y be such that f(\mathbf x) = 0 and g(\mathbf y)=0, then, in an open neighborhood of \mathbf p, the complex \phi_{{}_{f\boxplus g}}[-1]\big({\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ }{\mathbf B^\bullet}\big) has support contained in V(f)\times V(g), and, in any open set in which we have this containment, there are natural isomorphisms

\phi_{{}_{f\boxplus g}}[-1]\big({\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ }{\mathbf B^\bullet}\big)\ \cong\ k_!(\phi_{{}_f}[-1]{\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ } \phi_{{}_g}[-1]{\mathbf B^\bullet})\ \cong\ k_*(\phi_{{}_f}[-1]{\mathbf A^\bullet}{\ {\boxtimes^L}\ } \phi_{{}_g}[-1]{\mathbf B^\bullet}).

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:math/9908107v14 by David B. Massey, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/9908/math-9908107.jsonl.