Define v_n^m(CL)={\mathcal V}_n^m(\mathfrak o(CL)) for all CL\in {\mathcal C \mathcal L} and m\in {\mathbb N}. Now we can form the power series R_n(CL). Guided by (12)-(13) we define
R_n(CL _r)=t^{{{{-(n+1)}}}} R_n(CL) \ {\rm and}\ R_n(CL_l)=t^{{{{(n+1)}}}}R_n(CL).\eqno(15)
Now guided by these we can define the values of R_n on all framed links whose underlying unframed isotopy class is CL. To explain this suppose that CL has s components. Let CL({\bf f}) be a framed link in the same (unframed) isotopy class with CL with framing unordered sequence {\bf f} (see Definition 2.2 and preceding discussion). Then define
R_n(CL({\bf f}))=t^{(n+1)\tau}R_n(CL),
where {\tau}:={\tau}(CL({\bf f})) is the total framing of CL({\bf f}). Using (14)-(15), and inducting on k, we can check that
R_{n}(CL\sqcup U^k) =[ u_n(t)]^{k-1}\ R_n(CL)\eqno(16)
where u_n(t) is given by (10). Now R_n has been defined on all framed links in the unframed isotopy classes of the links in \mathcal C \mathcal L.
To continue for every L({\bf f})\in {\mathcal L} with framing sequence {\bf f} we define
v_n^0(L({\bf{f}}))=v_n^0(CL({\bf f})),
where CL is the initial link homotopic to L. Inductively, suppose that the invariants v_n^0, v_n^1, \dots, v_{n}^{m-1} have been defined such that if we let
R_{ n}^{(m-1)}(L):= \sum_{i=1}^{m-1}v_n^i(L)x^i,
then we have
R_n^{(m-1)}(L_r)=t^{{{{-(n+1)}}}} R^{(m-1)}_n(L)\ {\rm mod}\ x^m \eqno (17)
R_n^{(m-1)}(L_l)=t^{{{{(n+1)}}}}R_n^{(m-1)}(L)\ {\rm mod}\ x^m \eqno (18)
R_{n}^{(m-1)}(L\sqcup U) = u_n(t)\ R_n(L) \ {\rm mod}\ x^m \eqno (19)
and
R_n ^{(m-1)}({L_{+}})
-R_n^{(m-1)}({L_{-}})
= (t-t^{-1}) [ R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{o})-R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{\infty})]\ {\rm mod}\ x^m.
Furthermore, suppose that these invariants do not depend on the orientation of the links. The last equation leads us to define
R_n^{(m)}({L_{\times}}):=
(t-t^{-{1}})[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o})-R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{\infty})]\ {\rm mod} \ x^{m+1} \eqno(20)
We want to define the invariant v_m^n: Recall that it is already defined on the initial links. Next we examine the right hand side of (20). It is a polynomial of degree m such that the coefficient of x^m comes from
(t-t^{-{1}})[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o})-R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{\infty})].
The expression above has no constant term and thus the coefficient of x^m depends on the inductively well defined invariants v_n^i, i=1, 2, \ldots,m-1. Thus the coefficient of x^m in (20) is a “new" framed singular link invariant. We are going to prove that it is derived from a framed link invariant by using Theorem 2.2. For that we need to check that condition (3) in the statement 2.2 is satisfied. It is enough to check it modulo x^{m+1}. In what follows the symbol “\equiv" will denote calculation modulo x^{m+1}.
Let L_{\times +} and L_{ \times- } \in {\mathcal L}^{(1)} be two singular framed links as in the left hand side of (3) in the statement 2.2. From (20) we have
\begin{aligned}
&&{R}_n^{(m)}(L_{{\times }+})-
R_n^{(m)}(L_{{\times }-}) \equiv\cr
&\equiv&
(t-t^{-{1}})\big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o +})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{ \infty +})\big]-\cr
&-&(t-t^{-{1}})\ \big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o -})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty -}) \big]\equiv \cr
&\equiv&
(t-t^{-{1}})\big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o +})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o -}) \big] -\cr
&-&(t-t^{-{1}})\big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{ \infty +})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty -})\big]\equiv \cr
&\equiv&
{(t-t^{-1})}^2
\big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{oo})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o \infty})\big] -\cr
&-&{
(t-t^{-{1}})}^2\big[ R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty o})-R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty \infty })
\big]\equiv \cr
&\equiv&
{(t-t^{-1})}^2
\big[R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{oo})+R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty \infty})\big] -\cr
&-&{
(t-t^{-{1}})}^2\big[ R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty o})+R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{o \infty })
\big].
\end{aligned}
Since the result is symmetric with respect to the two double points we deduce that
R_n^{(m)}(L_{{\times}+})-R_n^{(m)}(L_{{\times}-})\equiv
R_n^{(m)}(L_{+{\times}})-R_n^{(m)}(L_{-{\times}}).
Thus the framed singular link invariant defined above is induced by a framed link invariant. Recall that we have already defined the values of v_n^m on all framed links with unframed underlying isotopy classes in \mathcal C \mathcal L. Using this values we can define a link invariant v_n^m for all links in \mathcal L such that if we let
R_{ n}^{(m)}(L)= \sum_{i=1}^{m}v_n^m(L)x^i
we have
R_n ^{(m)}({L_{+}})
-R_n^{(m)}({L_{-}})= R_n^{(m)}({L_{\times}}), \eqno(21)
for every L_{\times} \in {\mathcal L}^{(1)}. Now it is a straightforward calculation to check that the inductive hypotheses hold mod x^{m+1}. For example let us check (18); the others are similar. Consider a framed link L_r. Keeping the kink intact in a small 3-ball, make a sequence of crossing changes to transform L_l to an initial link say CL_l. Over all such sequences of crossing changes, and initial links CL_l, choose one that minimizes the number of the required crossing changes. Suppose, without loss of generality, that the first crossing to be changed in that sequence is a positive crossing. By (20) and (21) we have
R_n ^{(m)}({L_{l+}}) \equiv
R_n^{(m)}({L_{l-}})
+ (t-t^{-1}) [ R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{lo})-R_n^
{(m-1)}(L_{l\infty})]\ {\rm mod}\ x^{m+1}.
By (15) and induction on the number of crossing changes needed to go from L_{l+} to CL_l we can assume that
R_n^{(m)}(L_{l-})\equiv t^{{{{(n+1)}}}}R_n^{(m)}(L)
By (18) we have
R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{lo})=t^{{{{(n+1)}}}}R_n^{(m-1)}(L_o)\ {\rm mod}\ x^m,
and
R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{l\infty})=t^{{{{(n+1)}}}}R_n^{(m-1)}(L_{\infty} )\ {\rm mod}\ x^m.
Combining the last four equations we have
R_n ^{(m)}({L_{l+}}) \equiv t^{{{{(n+1)}}}} R_n ^{(m)}({L_{+}}),
as desired. To finish the proof we need to show that v_n^m is independent of the link orientation. Inductively, we assume that v_n^0, v_n^1, \dots, v_{n}^{m-1} are uniquely determined by their values on {\mathcal CL} and independent of the (singular) link orientation. We have that
v_n^m(L)=v_n^m(CL)+ \sum_{i=1}^s {\pm} v_n^m (L_i)
where L_1, \dots, L_s\in {\mathcal L}^{(1)} are singular links appearing in a homotopy from L to CL, where CL is the representative of L in {\mathcal CL} (compare relation (5)). Recall that we defined v_n^m(CL) to be independent of the orientation for CL. The proof of Theorem 2.2 establishes that v_n^m(L) doesn’t depend on the homotopy from L to CL chosen. By induction v_n^0, v_n^1, \dots, v_{n}^{m-1} do not depend on orientations. It follows that v_n^m(L) is unique once v_n^m(CL) is chosen and independent on link orientation.