arXiv reader

Sampling and Recovery of Multidimensional Bandlimited Functions via Frames

Benjamin Aaron Bailey

arXiv
1009.2043v1 · PDF · 10 September 2010
Categories
math.NA, cs.NA
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate frames for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d consisting of exponential functions in connection to oversampling and nonuniform sampling of bandlimited functions. We derive a multidimensional nonuniform oversampling formula for bandlimited functions with a fairly general frequency domain. The stability of said formula under various perturbations in the sampled data is investigated, and a computationally managable simplification of the main oversampling theorem is given. Also, a generalization of Kadec’s 1/4 Theorem to higher dimensions is considered. Finally, the developed techniques are used to approximate biorthogonal functions of particular exponential Riesz bases for L_2[-\pi,\pi], and a well known theorem of Levinson is recovered as a corollary.

Items 34

Definition

Definition 2.1

2RYP

Given a bounded measurable set E with positive measure, we define PW_E := \{f \in L_2(\mathbb{R}^d) \arrowvert \mathrm{supp}(\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)) \subset E \}. Functions in PW_E are said to be bandlimited.

Definition

Definition 2.2

NPW3

The function \mathrm{sinc}:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} is defined by \mathrm{sinc}(x) = \frac{\sin(x)}{x}. We also define the multidimensional sinc function \mathrm{SINC}:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^d by \mathrm{SINC}(x) = \mathrm{sinc}(x_1)\cdot\ldots\cdot\mathrm{sinc}(x_d), x=(x_1,\ldots, x_d).

Definition

Definition 2.3

EETY

A sequence (f_n)_n \subset H such that the map L e_n = f_n is an onto isomorphism is called a Riesz basis for H.

Definition

Definition 2.4

Q9IC

A frame for a separable Hilbert space H is a sequence (f_n)_n \subset H such that for some 0<A<B,

A\Arrowvert f \Arrowvert^2 \leq \sum_n | \langle f , f_n \rangle |^2 \leq B\Arrowvert f \Arrowvert^2, \quad \forall f \in H.
Definition

Definition 2.5

HFLH

A sequence (f_n)_n satisfying the second inequality in equation (2.4) is called a Bessel sequence.

Definition

Definition 2.6

3BQ2

An exact frame is a frame which ceases to be one if any of its elements is removed.

Definition

Definition 2.7

QCPK

A subset S of \mathbb{R}^d is said to be uniformly separated if

\inf_{x,y \in S, x \neq y} \Arrowvert x-y \Arrowvert_2 >0.
Definition

Definition 2.8

0AC0

If S=(x_k)_k is a sequence of real numbers and f is a function with S in its domain, then f_{S} denotes the sequence (f(x_k))_k.

Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 3.1

1BHJ

Let 0 \in E \subset \mathbb{R}^d be compact such that for all \lambda > 1, E \subset \mathrm{int}(\lambda E). Choose S=(t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}, defined by f_n(\cdotp) = e^{i \langle \cdotp , t_n \rangle}, is a frame for L_2(E) with frame operator S. Let \lambda_0 >1 with \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g):\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}, \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g) \in C^\infty where \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)\arrowvert_{E} = 1 and \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)\arrowvert_{(\lambda_0 E)^c}=0. If \lambda \geq \lambda_0 and f \in PW_E, then

f(t) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Big( \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} B_{kn} f\big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \Big) g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big), \quad t \in \mathbb{R}^d,

where B_{kn} = \langle S^{-1}f_n , S^{-1}f_k \rangle_E. Convergence of the sum is in L_2(\mathbb{R}^d), hence also uniform. Further, the map B:\ell_2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2(\mathbb{N}) defined by (y_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto \big( \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} B_{kn} y_n \big)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is bounded linear, and is an onto isomorphism iff (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2(E).

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Define f_{\lambda,n} (\cdotp) = f_n \big( \frac{\cdotp}{\lambda} \big). Note that (f_{\lambda,n})_n is a frame for L_2(\lambda E) with frame operator S_\lambda.

Step 1: We show that

f = \sum_{n} f \Big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \Big) \mathcal{F}[(S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda, n})\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)], \quad f \in PW_E.

We know \mathrm{supp}(\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)) \subset E \subset \lambda E, so we may work with \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) via its frame decomposition. We have

\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) = S_\lambda^{-1} S_\lambda (\mathcal{F}^{-1} (f)) = \sum_n \langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) , f_{\lambda,n} \rangle_{\lambda E} S^{-1}_{\lambda} f_{\lambda,n}, \quad \mathrm{on} \quad \lambda E.

This yields

\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) = \sum_n \langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) , f_{\lambda,n} \rangle_{\lambda E} (S^{-1}_{\lambda} f_{\lambda,n})\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g), \quad \mathrm{on} \quad \mathbb{R}^d,

since \mathrm{supp}\mathcal{F}(g)\subset \lambda E. Taking Fourier transforms we obtain

f = \sum_n \langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) , f_{\lambda,n} \rangle_{\lambda E} \mathcal{F}[(S^{-1}_{\lambda} f_{\lambda,n})\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)], \quad \mathrm{on} \quad \mathbb{R}^d.

Now

\begin{aligned} \langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) , f_{\lambda,n} \rangle_{\lambda E} = \int_{\lambda E} \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)(\xi) e^{-i \langle \xi , \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \rangle} d\xi = f \Big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \Big) \end{aligned}

which, when substituted into equation (?), yields (Proof).

Step 2: We show that

f(\cdotp) = \sum_n f \Big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \Big) \Big[ \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} g\big(\cdotp-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) \Big],

where convergence is in L_2.

We compute \mathcal{F}[(S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n})\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)]. For h \in L_2 (\lambda E) we have

\begin{aligned} h = S_\lambda (S_\lambda^{-1} h) = \sum_k \langle S_\lambda^{-1} h , f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} f_{\lambda,k} = \sum_k \langle h , S_\lambda^{-1} f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} f_{\lambda,k}. \end{aligned}

Letting h = S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n},

S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} = \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} f_{\lambda,k}.

This gives

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{F}[(S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n})F^{-1}(g)](\cdotp) & = & \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} \mathcal{F}[f_{\lambda,k} \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)](\cdotp)\\ & = & \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} \int_{\lambda E} e^{i \langle \xi , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle}\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)(\xi) e^{-i \langle \xi , \cdotp \rangle}d \xi \\ & = & \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} \int_{\lambda E} \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)(\xi) e^{-i\langle \cdotp-\frac{t_k}{\lambda} , \xi \rangle} d \xi\\ & = & \sum_k \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} g \big( \cdotp -\frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big), \end{aligned}

so (?) follows from (Proof).

Step 3: We show that

\langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\langle S^{-1} f_n , S^{-1} f_k \rangle_E, \quad \mathrm{for} \quad n,k \in \mathbb{N}.

First we show (S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n})(\cdotp) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}(S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda}), or equivalently that f_{\lambda,n} = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}S_\lambda \big((S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda})\big).

We have for any g \in L_2 (\lambda E),

\begin{aligned} \langle g , f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} & = & \int_{\lambda E} g(\xi) e ^{-i \langle \frac{\xi}{\lambda} , t_k \rangle} d \xi = \lambda^d \int_E g(\lambda x) e ^{-i \langle x , t_k \rangle} d x =\lambda^d \langle g(\lambda(\cdot)) , f_k \rangle_E. \end{aligned}

By definition of the frame operator S_\lambda,

S_{\lambda} g = \sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \langle g , f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} f_{\lambda,k},

which then becomes

S_\lambda g = \lambda^d \sum_k \langle g(\lambda(\cdot)) , f_k \rangle_E f_{\lambda,k}.

Substituting g = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}(S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda}) into the equation above we obtain

\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\lambda^d} S_\lambda \big( (S^{-1} f_n) \big(\frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big) \big) & = & \sum_k \langle S^{-1} f_n , f_k \rangle_E f_{\lambda,k} = \big( S(S^{-1} f_n) \big) \big( \frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big) = f_{\lambda,n}. \end{aligned}

We now compute the desired inner product:

\begin{aligned} \langle S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n} , S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,k} \rangle_{\lambda E} & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^{2d}}\int_{\lambda E} (S^{-1}f_n)\big(\frac{x}{\lambda}\big)\overline{(S^{-1}f_k)\big(\frac{x}{\lambda}\big)} dx \\ & = & \frac{\lambda^d}{\lambda^{2d}}\int_E (S^{-1} f_n)(x)\overline{(S^{-1} f_k)(x)} dx = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\langle S^{-1} f_n , S^{-1} f_k \rangle_E. \end{aligned}

Note that equation (?) becomes

f(\cdotp) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_n f \big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \Big[ \sum_k \langle S^{-1} f_n , S^{-1} f_k \rangle g\big(\cdotp-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) \big].

Step 4: The map V:\ell_2 (\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2 (\mathbb{N}) given by x=(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto \big( \sum_n B_{kn} x_n \big)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} = Bx is bounded linear and self-adjoint.

Let (d_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be the standard basis for \ell_2 (\mathbb{N}), and let (e_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an orthonormal basis for L_2(E). Then

\begin{aligned} V d_j & = & (B_{kj})_{k\in \mathbb{N}} = \sum_k B_{kj} d_k = \sum_k \langle S^{-1} f_j , S^{-1} f_k \rangle d_k = \sum_k \langle L^*(S^{-1})^2 L e_j , e_k \rangle d_k, \end{aligned}

where L is the preframe operator, i.e., S =L L^*. Define \phi:\ell^2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow L_2(E) by \phi(d_k) = e_k, k \in \mathbb{N}. Clearly \phi is unitary. It follows that V = \phi^{-1} L^* (S^{-1})^2 L \phi, which concludes Step 4. From here on we identify V with B. Clearly B is an onto isomorphism iff L and L^* are both onto, i.e., iff the map L e_n = f_n is an onto isomorphism.

Step 5: Verification of equation (3.1). Recalling Definition 2.8, f_{S/\lambda} = \big( f\big(\frac{t_n}{\lambda}\big) \big)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}; for each t \in \mathbb{R}^d, let g_\lambda (t) = \big( g\big(t-\frac{t_n}{\lambda}\big) \big)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}. Noting that f\big(\frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big), g\big(t-\frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big) \in L_2 (\lambda E), and recalling that (f_{\lambda,n})_n is a frame for L_2(\lambda E), we have

\sum_n \big| f\big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \big|^2 = \sum |\langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f), f_{\lambda,n}\rangle_{\lambda E}|^2 \leq A_\lambda \Arrowvert \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) \Arrowvert^2,

and

\sum_n \big| g\big(t- \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \big|^2 = \sum |\langle \mathcal{F}^{-1}\big( g\big(t- \frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big)\big), f_{\lambda,n}\rangle_{\lambda E}|^2 \leq A_\lambda \Arrowvert \mathcal{F}^{-1}\big( g\big(t- \frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big)\big) \Arrowvert^2.

Note that equation (?) becomes

\begin{aligned} f(t) & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_n f \big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \Big[ \sum_k B_{kn} g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) \Big] = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_n f \big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \overline{\Big[ \sum_k B_{nk} \overline{g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big)} \Big]}\\ & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_n (f_{S/\lambda})_n (B\overline{g_\lambda (t)})_n = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\langle f_{S/\lambda} , B\overline{g_\lambda (t)} \rangle = \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \langle B f_{S/\lambda} , \overline{g_\lambda (t)} \rangle\\ & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_k (B f_{S/\lambda})_k g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Big( \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} B_{kn} f\big( \frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \Big) g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big), \end{aligned}

which proves (3.1).

Step 6: We verify that convergence in equation (3.1) is in L_2 (\mathbb{R}) (hence uniform). Define

f_n (t) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{1 \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big)

and

f_{m,n} (t) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k g\big(t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big).

Then

\begin{aligned} [\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f_{m,n})](\xi) & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k \mathcal{F}^{-1}\big[g\big(\cdotp-\frac{t_n}{\lambda} \big) \big] \\ & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g) (\xi) e^{i \langle \xi , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle}, \end{aligned}

so

\begin{aligned} \Arrowvert [\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f_{m,n})] \Arrowvert^2_2 & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \int_{\lambda E} | \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g) (\xi)|^2 \Big| \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k e^{i \langle \xi , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle} \Big|^2 d \xi\\ & \leq & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k f_{\lambda,k} \Big\Arrowvert^2_2. \end{aligned}

If (h_n)_n is a orthonormal basis for L_2(\lambda E), then the map T h_k = f_{\lambda,k} (the preframe operator) is bounded linear, so

\begin{aligned} \Arrowvert [\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f_{m,n})] \Arrowvert^2_2 & \leq & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert T \Big( \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} (B f_{S/\lambda})_k h_k \Big) \Big\Arrowvert^2_2 \leq \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Arrowvert T \Arrowvert^2 \sum_{m \leq k \leq n} | (B f_{S/\lambda})_k|^2. \end{aligned}

But B f_{S/\lambda} \in \ell^2(\mathbb{N}), so \Arrowvert [\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f_{m,n})] \Arrowvert_2\rightarrow 0 as m,n \rightarrow \infty. As \mathcal{F}^{-1} is an onto isomorphism, we have \Arrowvert f_{m,n} \Arrowvert \rightarrow 0, implying that \Arrowvert f-f_n \Arrowvert \rightarrow 0 as n \rightarrow \infty.

Proposition

Proposition 3.2

SUPC

If 0 \in E \subset \mathbb{R}^d is compact, then the following are equivalent:
1) E \subset \mathrm{int}(\lambda E) for all \lambda >1.
2) There exists a continuous map \phi:S^{d-1} \rightarrow (0, \infty) such that E = \{t y \phi(y)|y \in S^{d-1} , t \in [0,1]\}.

Theorem

Theorem 3.3

J241

Choose (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}, defined by f_n(\cdotp) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i \langle \cdotp , t_n \rangle}, is a frame for L_2([-\pi,\pi]^d). If f \in PW_E, then

f(t) = \sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Big( \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} B_{kn} f(t_n) \Big) \mathrm{SINC}(\pi(t-t_k)), \quad t \in \mathbb{R}^d.

The matrix B and the convergence of the sum are as in Theorem 3.1.

Theorem

Theorem 3.4

CUQP

Let \Lambda \subset \mathbb{R}^d be countable such that

\begin{aligned} r(\Lambda) & := & \frac{1}{2}\inf_{\lambda, \mu \in \Lambda, \lambda \neq \mu} \Arrowvert \lambda - \mu \Arrowvert_2 >0 \\ \mathrm{and} \quad R(\Lambda) & := & \sup_{\xi \in \mathbb{R}^d} \inf_{\lambda \in \Lambda} \Arrowvert \lambda - \mu \Arrowvert_2 < \frac{\pi}{2}. \end{aligned}

If E is a subset of the closed unit ball in \mathbb{R}^d and E has positive measure, then \{e^{i\langle \cdot , \lambda \rangle} | \lambda \in \Lambda\} is a frame for L_2(E).

Theorem

Theorem 5.1

LNGI

Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and S=(t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that

\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \Arrowvert n_k - t_k \Arrowvert_\infty = 0.

Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}, and let (h_k)_k be the standard basis for \ell_2(\mathbb{N}). Let P_l:\ell_2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2(\mathbb{N}) be the orthogonal projection onto \mathrm{span}\{h_1,\cdots,h_l\}. If (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, then for all f \in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]^d}, we have

f(t) = \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{k=1}^l [(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( t-\frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big), \quad t \in \mathbb{R}^d,

where convergence is in L_2 and uniform. Furthermore,

(P_l B^{-1} P_l)_{nm} = \left\{ \begin{array}{lr} \mathrm{sinc} \pi(t_{n,1}-t_{m,1}) \cdot \ldots \cdot \mathrm{sinc} \pi(t_{n,d}-t_{m,d}), & 1 \leq n,m \leq l\\ 0, & \mathrm{otherwise.} \end{array} \right.

Convergence of the sum is in L_2 and also uniform.

Theorem

Theorem 5.2

9ZH1

Under the hypotheses of Theorem 5.1,

f(t) = \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k=1}^l [(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} f_S]_k \mathrm{SINC}( t-t_k), \quad t \in \mathbb{R}^d,

where convergence of the sum is both L_2 and uniform.

Lemma

Lemma 5.3

HGRN

Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d. Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and f_k(x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}. Then for any r,s\geq 1, and any finite sequence (a_k)_{k=r}^s, we have

\Bigg\Arrowvert \sum_{k=r}^s\Big( \frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i\langle (\cdot) , n_k \rangle}- \frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i\langle (\cdot) , t_k \rangle} \Big) \Bigg\Arrowvert_2 \leq \Big( e^{\pi d \big({\sup \atop {r \leq k \leq s}} \Arrowvert n_k-t_k \Arrowvert_\infty\big)}-1\Big) \Big(\sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2\Big)^{1/2}.
Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 5.3

Let \delta_k = t_k-n_k where \delta_k = (\delta_{k1}, \cdots , \delta_{kd}). Then

\begin{aligned} \phi_{r,s}(x):=\sum_{k=r}^s \frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} \big[ e^{i\langle n_k , x \rangle} - e^{i\langle t_k , x \rangle}\big] = \sum_{k=r}^s \frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i\langle n_k , x \rangle} \big[ 1 - e^{i\langle \delta_k , x \rangle}\big], \end{aligned}

Now for any \delta_k,

\begin{aligned} 1 - e^{i \langle \delta_k , x \rangle} & = & 1-e^{i\delta_{k1} x_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot e^{i\delta_{kd} x_d} = 1-\Big(\sum_{j_1 = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(i \delta_{k1} x_1)^{j_1}}{j_1 !} \Big) \cdot \ldots \cdot \Big( \sum_{j_d = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(i \delta_{kd} x_d)^{j_d}}{j_d !} \Big)\\ & = & 1-\sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \atop j_i \geq 0} \frac{(i \delta_{k1} x_1)^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot (i \delta_{kd} x_d)^{j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !}\\ & = & -\sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J} i^{j_1 +\ldots + j_d}\frac{(\delta_{k1} x_1)^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot (\delta_{kd} x_d)^{j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !}, \end{aligned}

where J = \{ (j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in \mathbb{Z}^d |j_i \geq 0, (j_1,\cdots, j_d) \neq 0\}. Then equation (Proof) becomes

\begin{aligned} \phi_{r,s}(x) & = & -\sum_{k=r}^s \frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i\langle n_k , x \rangle}\Big[ \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J} i^{j_1 +\ldots + j_d}\frac{(\delta_{k1} x_1)^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot (\delta_{kd} x_d)^{j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Big]\\ & = & -\sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J} \frac{x_1^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot x_d^{j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} i^{j_1 +\ldots + j_d} \sum_{k=r}^s\frac{a_k}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}\delta_{k1}^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot \delta_{kd}^{j_d} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle}, \end{aligned}

so

\begin{aligned} |\phi_{r,s}(x)| \leq \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J} \frac{\pi^{j_1 + \ldots +j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Big| \sum_{k=r}^s a_k \delta_{k1}^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot \delta_{kd}^{j_d} \frac{e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle}}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} \Big|. \end{aligned}

For brevity denote the outer summand above by h_{j_1 , \ldots ,j_d}(t). Then

\begin{aligned} \bigg(\int_{[-\pi,\pi]^d} |\phi_{r,s}(x)|^2 dt \bigg)^\frac{1}{2} & \leq & \bigg( \int_{[-\pi,\pi]^d} \Big| \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } h_{j_1 , \ldots ,j_d}(x) \Big|^2 dx \bigg)^\frac{1}{2} \\ & \leq & \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } \bigg( \int_{[-\pi,\pi]^d} \Big| h_{j_1 , \ldots ,j_d}(x) \Big|^2 dx \bigg)^\frac{1}{2}, \end{aligned}

so that

\begin{aligned} \Arrowvert \phi_{r,s} \Arrowvert_2 & \leq & \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } \frac{\pi^{j_1 + \cdot \ldots \cdot +j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Big( \int_{[-\pi,\pi]^d} \bigg| \sum_{k=r}^s a_k \delta_{k1}^{j_1} \cdot \ldots \cdot \delta_{kd}^{j_d} \frac{e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle}}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} \bigg|^2 dx \Big)^\frac{1}{2}\\ & = & \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } \frac{\pi^{j_1 + \cdot \ldots \cdot +j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Big( \sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2 |\delta_{k1}^{j_1}|^2 \cdot \ldots \cdot |\delta_{kd}^{j_d}|^2 \Big)^\frac{1}{2}\\ & \leq & \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } \frac{\pi^{j_1 + \cdot \ldots \cdot +j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Bigg( \sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2 \Big({\sup \atop {r \leq k \leq s}} \Arrowvert n_k-t_k \Arrowvert_\infty\Big)^{2(j_1 + \ldots + j_d)} \Bigg)^\frac{1}{2}\\ & = & \sum_{(j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in J } \frac{\Big(\pi{\sup \atop {r \leq k \leq s}} \Arrowvert n_k-t_k \Arrowvert_\infty\Big)^{j_1 + \cdot \ldots \cdot + j_d}}{j_1 ! \cdot \ldots \cdot j_d !} \Big( \sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2 \Big)^\frac{1}{2}\\ & = & \bigg[ \prod_{l=1}^d\bigg( \sum_{j_\ell = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\big(\pi{\sup \atop {r \leq k \leq s}} \Arrowvert n_k-t_k \Arrowvert_\infty\big)^{j_\ell}}{j_\ell !} \bigg)-1 \bigg]\Big(\sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2\Big)^\frac{1}{2}\\ & = & \Big( e^{\pi d \big({\sup \atop {r \leq k \leq s}} \Arrowvert n_k-t_k \Arrowvert_\infty\big)}-1\Big) \Big(\sum_{k=r}^s |a_k|^2\Big)^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned}
Corollary

Corollary 5.4

YVG7

Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that

\sup_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Arrowvert n_k - t_k \Arrowvert_\infty = L < \infty.

Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}. Then the map T:L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d \rightarrow L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, defined by T e_n = e_n - f_n, satisfies the following estimate:

\Arrowvert T \Arrowvert \leq e^{\pi L d} -1.
Proof of Corollary 5.4

Lemma (5.3) shows that T is uniformly continuous on a dense subset of the ball in L_2(E), so T is bounded on L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d. The inequality (5.4) follows immediately.

Corollary

Corollary 5.5

NB39

Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}, (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d, and let e_k, f_k and T be defined as in Corollary 5.4. For each l \in \mathbb{N}, define T_l by T_l e_k = e_k - f_k for 1 \leq k \leq l, and T_l e_k = 0 for l < k. If \lim_{k \rightarrow\infty} \Arrowvert n_k - t_k \Arrowvert_\infty = 0, then \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} T_l = T in the operator norm. In particular, T is a compact operator.

Proof of Corollary 5.5

As

\begin{aligned} (T-T_l) \big( \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k e_k \big) & = & \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k (e_k -f_k) - \sum_{k=1}^l a_k (e_k -f_k) \\ & = & \sum_{k=l+1}^\infty a_k (e_k -f_k) = T \big( \sum_{k=l+1}^\infty a_k e_k \big), \end{aligned}

the estimate derived in lemma (5.3) yields

\begin{aligned} \big\Arrowvert (T-T_l)\big( \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k e_k \big) \big\Arrowvert_2 & = & \big\Arrowvert T \big( \sum_{k=l+1}^\infty a_k e_k \big) \big\Arrowvert_2 \leq \big( e^{\pi d {\sup \atop k \geq l+1} \Arrowvert \delta_k \Arrowvert_\infty}-1 \big) \big\Arrowvert \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k e_k \big\Arrowvert_2, \end{aligned}

so \big\Arrowvert (T-T_l)\big\Arrowvert_2 \rightarrow 0 as l \rightarrow \infty. As T_l has finite rank, we deduce that T is compact.

Proof

Proof

OCML

Step 1: B is a compact perturbation of the identity map, namely

B = I+\lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}).

Since (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, L^* = (I-T) is an onto isomorphism where T e_k = e_k -f_k; so B simplifies to (I-T)^{-1} (I-T^*)^{-1}. We examine

\begin{aligned} B^{-1} = (I-T^*)(I-T) = I+(T^* T-T-T^*) := I+\Delta, \end{aligned}

where \Delta is a compact operator. If an operator \Delta:H \rightarrow H is compact then so is \Delta^*, hence P_l \Delta P_l \rightarrow \Delta in the operator norm because

\begin{aligned} \Arrowvert P_l \Delta P_l -\Delta \Arrowvert & \leq & \Arrowvert P_l \Delta P_l -P_l \Delta \Arrowvert + \Arrowvert P_l \Delta -\Delta \Arrowvert \leq \Arrowvert \Delta P_l -\Delta \Arrowvert + \Arrowvert P_l \Delta -\Delta \Arrowvert\\ & = & \Arrowvert P_l \Delta^* -\Delta^* \Arrowvert + \Arrowvert P_l \Delta -\Delta \Arrowvert \rightarrow 0. \end{aligned}

We have

\begin{aligned} B^{-1} & = & \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (I+P_l \Delta P_l) = \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (I+P_l (B^{-1}-I) P_l) = \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (I-P_l +P_l B^{-1} P_l). \end{aligned}

Now (P_l B^{-1} P_l) restricted to the first l rows and columns is the Grammian matrix for the set (f_1,\cdots,f_l) which can be shown (in a straightforward manner) to be linearly independent. We conclude that P_l B^{-1} P_l is invertible as an l \times l matrix. By (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} we mean the inverse as an l \times l matrix and zeroes elsewhere. Observing that the ranges of P_l B^{-1} P_l and (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} are in the kernel of I-P_l, and that the range of I-P_l is in the kernels of P_l B^{-1} P_l and (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}, we easily compute

(I-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1})^{-1} = I-P_l +P_l B^{-1} P_l,

so that

B^{-1} = \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (I-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1})^{-1},

implying

\begin{aligned} B & = & \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (I-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}) := \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} B_l = I+\lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} (-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}). \end{aligned}

Step 2: We verifiy equation (5.1) and its convergence properties. Recalling equation (?), we have

\begin{aligned} f(t) & - & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(I-P_l +(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}) f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( t- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(B-B_l) f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( t- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \end{aligned}

implying

\begin{aligned} f(t) & - & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{l}[(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( t- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \\ & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(B-B_l) f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( t- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) + \frac{1}{\lambda^d}\sum_{k=l+1}^{\infty} f\big( \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) g\big( t- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big). \end{aligned}

Therefore,

\begin{aligned} & \Big\Arrowvert & f(\cdot) - \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{l}[(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( \cdot- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \Big\Arrowvert_2 = \\ & = & \Big\Arrowvert \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(B-B_l) f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( \cdot- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) + \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=l+1}^{\infty} f\big( \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) g\big( \cdot- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \Big\Arrowvert_{[-\lambda\pi,\lambda\pi]^d} \\ & = & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)(\cdot) \Big( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(B-B_l) f_{S/\lambda}]_k e^{i\langle \cdot , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle} + \sum_{k=l+1}^{\infty} f\big( \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) e^{i\langle \cdot , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle} \Big) \Big\Arrowvert_{[-\lambda\pi,\lambda\pi]^d} \end{aligned}

after taking the inverse Fourier transform. Now

\begin{aligned} & \Big\Arrowvert & f(\cdot) - \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \sum_{k=1}^{l}[(P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} f_{S/\lambda}]_k g\big( \cdot- \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \Big\Arrowvert_2 \\ & \leq & \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(B-B_l) f_{S/\lambda}]_k e^{i\langle \cdot , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle} \Big\Arrowvert_{[-\lambda\pi,\lambda\pi]^d} + \frac{1}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert \sum_{k=l+1}^{\infty} f\big( \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) e^{i\langle \cdot , \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \rangle} \Big\Arrowvert_{[-\lambda\pi,\lambda\pi]^d}\\ & \leq & \frac{M}{\lambda^d} \Big\Arrowvert (B-B_l)f_{S/\lambda} \Big\Arrowvert_{\ell_2(\mathbb{N})} + \frac{M}{\lambda^d} \Big( \sum_{k=l+1}^{\infty} \big| f\big( \frac{t_k}{\lambda} \big) \big|^2 \Big)^\frac{1}{2}, \end{aligned}

since \big(f_k\big(\frac{\cdot}{\lambda}\big)\big)_k is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\lambda\pi, \lambda\pi]^d. Since B_l \rightarrow B as l \rightarrow \infty and \big( f\big(\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) \big)_k \in \ell_2(\mathbb{N}), the last two terms in the inequality above tend to zero, which proves the required result.

Finally, to compute (P_l B^{-1} P_l)_{nm}, recall that B^{-1} = (I-T^*)(I-T). Proceeding in a manner similar to the proof of equation (?), we obtain

\begin{aligned} B^{-1}_{mn} & = & \langle L L^* e_n , e_m \rangle = \langle L^* e_n ,L^* e_m \rangle = \langle f_n , f_m \rangle\\ & = & \mathrm{sinc} \pi(t_{n,1}-t_{m,1}) \cdot \ldots \cdot \mathrm{sinc} \pi(t_{n,d}-t_{m,d}). \end{aligned}

The entries of P_l B^{-1} P_l agree with those of B^{-1} when 1 \leq n,m \leq l.

Theorem

Theorem 5.6

291Y

Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence of distinct points such that

\limsup_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} |n-t_n| = L < \frac{1}{4}.

Then the sequence of functions (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}, defined by f_k (x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}e^{i t_k x}, is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi].

Corollary

Corollary 6.1

S06A

Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that

\sup_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Arrowvert n_k - t_k \Arrowvert_\infty = L < \frac{\ln(2)}{\pi d}.

Then the sequence (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} defined by f_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i \langle x , t_k \rangle} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d.

Theorem

Theorem 6.2

NJF3

Let (a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}^d} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that

0 < L < \frac{1}{4},
D_d(L) := \Big(1-\cos \pi L+\sin \pi L +\frac{\sin \pi L}{\pi L} \Big)^d -\Big( \frac{\sin \pi L}{\pi L} \Big)^d,\quad \mathrm{and}
\Arrowvert a_n - n \Arrowvert_\infty \leq L, \quad n \in \mathbb{Z}^d.

If D_d(L)<1, then \big(\frac{1}{(2 \pi)^d} e^{i \langle a_n , (\cdot) \rangle}\big) is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d with frame bounds (1-D_d(L))^2 and (1+D_d(L))^2.

Theorem

Theorem 6.3

LETS

Let x_d be the unique number satisfying 0 < x_d <1/4 and D_d(x_d)=1. Then

\lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x_d -\frac{\ln 2}{\pi d}}{\frac{(\ln 2)^2}{12 \pi d^2}} =1.
Definition

Definition 7.1

ECNQ

A Kadec sequence is a sequence (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} of real numbers satisfying

\sup_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} |t_n -n| = D < 1/4.
Theorem

Theorem 7.2

2UJF

Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence (with t_n \neq 0 for n \neq 0) such that (f_n)_n = \big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{i t_n (\cdot)} \big)_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi], and let (e_n)_n be the standard exponential orthonormal basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If the map L given by L e_n = f_n satisfies the estimate \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert<1, then the biorthogonals G_n of \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\mathcal{F}(f_n)(\cdot) = \mathrm{sinc}(\pi(\cdot-t_n)) in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]} are

G_n (t) = \frac{H(t)}{(t-t_n)H^{'}(t_n)}, \quad n \in \mathbb{Z},

where

H(t) = (t-t_0) \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \Big(1-\frac{t}{t_n} \Big) \Big(1-\frac{t}{t_{-n}} \Big).
Proof of Theorem 7.2

We see that \delta_{nm} = \langle G_{l,m} , S_{l,n} \rangle, where S_{l,n} (t) =\mathrm{sinc}(\pi(t-t_n)) when |n| \leq l and S_{l,n} (t) =\mathrm{sinc}(\pi(t-n)) when |m| > l. Without loss of generality, let |m|<l. Equation (?) implies that G_{l,m}(k)=0 when |k|>l. By the WKS theorem we have

\begin{aligned} G_{l,m} (t) & = & \sum_{k=-l}^{k=l} G_{l,m} (k) \mathrm{sinc}(\pi(t-k)) = \Big( \sum_{k=-l}^{k=l} \frac{ t G_{l,m} (k)}{k-t} \Big) \mathrm{sinc}(\pi t)\\ & = & \frac{w_l(t)}{\prod_{k=1}^{l} (k-t)(-k-t)} \mathrm{sinc}(\pi t), \end{aligned}

where w_l is a polynomial of degree at most 2l. Noting that

\mathrm{sinc}(\pi t) = \prod_{k=1}^{\infty} \big( 1-\frac{t^2}{k^2} \big) \quad \mathrm{and} \quad \prod_{k=1}^{l} (k-t)(-k-t) = (-1)^l (l!)^2 \prod_{k=1}^{l} \big( 1-\frac{t^2}{k^2} \big),

we have

\begin{aligned} G_{l,m} (t) = \frac{(-1)^l w_l (t)}{(l!)^2} \prod_{k=l+1}^{\infty} \big( 1-\frac{t^2}{k^2} \big). \end{aligned}

Again by equation (?), \delta_{nm} = G_{l,m} (t_n) when |n| \leq l so that

\delta_{nm} = \frac{(-1)^l}{(l!)^2} w_l (t_n) \prod_{k=l+1}^{\infty} \big( 1-\frac{t_n^2}{k^2} \big).

This determines the zeroes of w_l. We deduce that

w_l(t) = \frac{c_l \prod_{k=1}^{k=l} (t-t_k)(t-t_{-k})}{t-t_m}

for some constant c_l. Absorbing constants, we have

G_{l,m} (t) = \frac{c_l H_l (t)}{t-t_m},

where

H_l (t) := (t-t_0) \prod_{k=1}^{l} \big(1-\frac{t}{t_k} \big) \big( 1-\frac{t}{t_{-k}} \big) \prod_{l+1}^{\infty} \big( 1-\frac{t^2}{k^2} \big).

Now 0 = H_l (t_m), so G_{l,m} (t) = c_l \frac{H_l (t) -H_l (t_m)}{t-t_m}. Taking limits, c_l = \frac{1}{(H_l)'(t_m)}. This yields

\\ G_{l,m} (t) = \frac{H_l (t)}{(t-t_m) H_l'(t_m) }.

Define

H(t) = (t-t_0)\prod_{k=1}^{\infty} \big(1 - \frac{t}{t_k} \big) \big( 1 - \frac{t}{t_{-k}} \big).

Basic complex analysis shows that H is entire, and H_l \rightarrow H and H_l' \rightarrow H' uniformly on compact subsets of \mathbb{C}. Furthermore, H'(t_k) \neq 0 for all k, since each t_k is a zero of H of multiplicity one. Together we have

\lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} G_{l,m}(t) = \frac{H(t)}{(t-t_m)H'(t_m)}, \quad t \in \mathbb{R}.

By the foregoing lemma, G_{l,m} \rightarrow G_m. Observing that convergence in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]} implies pointwise convergence yields the desired result.

Levinson proved a version of Theorem 7.2 in the case where (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} is a Kadec sequence. His original proof is found in [L, pages 47-67]). We recall that if (f_n)_n is a Riesz basis arising from a Kadec sequence, then the preframe operator L satisfies \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert <1. Levinson’s theorem is then recovered from Theorem 7.2.

Thebibliography.

N

AV S. A. Avdonin. On the question of Riesz bases of exponential functions in L^2. Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Ser. Mat., 13, 5-12 (Russian); English translation in Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Math, 7, (1979) 203-211. Ben J. Benedetto, Irregular sampling and frames, Wavelets - A Tutorial in Theory and Applications, C. Chui, Ed., Academic Press, New York, (1991) 1-63. BenH J. Benedetto and W.  Heller, Irregular sampling and the theory of frames, Part I, Note Mathematica, Suppl. 1, (1990) 103-125. B J. J. Benedetto, Paulo J. S. G. Ferriera, Modern Sampling Theory, Birkhauser, (2001). Be A. Beurling, Local harmonic analysis with some applications to differential operators, in “Some Recent Advances in the Basic Sciences, Vol. 1” (Proc. Annual Sci. Conf., Belfer Grad. School Sci., Yeshiva Univ., New York, 1962-1964), (1966) 109-125. CA Peter G. Casazza, The Art of Frames, Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 2, (2001) 129-201.

DD I. Daubechies, R. DeVore, Approximating a bandlimited function using very coursely quantized data: a family of stable sigma-delta modulators of arbitrary order, Annals of Mathematics 158, (2003) 679-710. DE Duffin. R. J , and Eachus, J. J. Some notes on an expansion theorem of Paley and Wiener. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 44, (1942) 850-855. F G. B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, (1999) 245. Kad Kadec, M. I. The exact value of the Paley-Wiener constant. Sov. Math. Dokl. 5, (1964) 559-561. L N. Levinson, Gap and Density Theorems, American Mathematical Society, (1940). PS H. Pak and C. Shin, Perturbation of Nonharmonic Fourier Series and Nonuniform Sampling Theorem, Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society 44, (2007) No.2, 351-358. SZ W. Sun, and X.  Zhou, On the Stability of Multivariate Trigonometric Systems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 235, (1999) 159-167. Y R. M. Young, An Introduction to Nonharmonic Fourier Series, Academic Press, (1980). Z A. Zayed, Advances in Shannon’s Sampling Theory, CRC Press, (2000).

Definition

Definition 7.3

0Y71

Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence such that (f_n)_n = \big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{i t_n (\cdot)} \big)_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If l \geq 0, the l-truncated sequence (t_{l,n})_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} is defined by t_{l,n} = t_n if |n| \leq l and t_{l,n} = n otherwise. Define f_{l,n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{i t_{l,n}(\cdot)} for n \in \mathbb{Z}, l \geq 0.

Proposition

Proposition 7.4

8CU7

Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence such that (f_n)_n (defined above) is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If (e_n)_n is the standard exponential orthonormal basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi] and the map L (defined above) satisfies the estimate \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert = \delta <1, then the following are true:

1) For l \geq 0 , the sequence (f_{l,n})_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi].
2) For l \geq 0, the map L_l defined by L_l e_n = f_{l,n} satisfies \Arrowvert L_l^{-1} \Arrowvert \leq \frac{1}{1-\delta}.

Used by Lemma 7.5, Proof
Proof of Proposition 7.4

If (c_n)_n \in \ell_2 (\mathbb{Z}), then

\begin{aligned} (I-L_l)\big(\sum_n c_n e_n \big) & = & \sum_n c_n (e_n-L_l e_n) = \sum_{|n|\leq l} (e_n -f_n) = (I-L) P_l \big(\sum_n c_n e_n \big), \end{aligned}

so that

(I-L_l) = (I-L)P_l.

From this, \Arrowvert I-L_l \Arrowvert \leq \delta, which implies 1) and 2).

Lemma

Lemma 7.5

ORH2

If (t_n)_n \subset \mathbb{R} satisfies the hypotheses of proposition 7.4, then

\lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} G_{l,n} = G_n

in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]}.

Uses Proposition 7.4 · Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 7.5

Note that

\begin{aligned} \delta_{nm} = \langle f_{l,n} , f_{l,m}^* \rangle = \langle L_l e_n , f_{l,m}^* \rangle = \langle e_n , L_l^* f_{l,m}^* \rangle \end{aligned}

so that for all m, f_{l,m}^* = (L_l^*)^{-1}e_m. Similarly, f_m^* = (L^*)^{-1}e_m. We have

\begin{aligned} f_{l,m}^* - f_m^* &= ((L_l^*)^{-1}-(L^*)^{-1})e_m = (L_l^*)^{-1}(L^*-L_l^*)(L^*)^{-1}e_m. \end{aligned}

Now equation (Proof) implies L-L_l = (L-I)(I-P_l), so that

\begin{aligned} f_{l,m}^* - f_m^* = (L_l^*)^{-1}(I-P_l)(L^*-I)(L^*)^{-1}e_m. \end{aligned}

Applying proposition 7.4 yields

\begin{aligned} \Arrowvert f_{l,m}^* - f_m^* \Arrowvert \leq \frac{1}{1-\delta}\Arrowvert (I-P_l)(L^*-I)(L^*)^{-1}e_m \Arrowvert, \end{aligned}

which for fixed m goes to 0 as l \rightarrow \infty. We conclude \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} f_{l,m}^* = f_m^*, which, upon passing to the Fourier transform, yields \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} G_{l,m} = G_m.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1009.2043v1 by Benjamin Aaron Bailey, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1009/1009.2043.jsonl.