arXiv reader

Depth and minimal number of generators of square free monomial ideals

Dorin Popescu

arXiv
1107.2621v3 · PDF · 14 October 2011
Categories
math.AC, math.CO
Licence
CC0 1.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Let I be an ideal of a polynomial algebra S over a field generated by square free monomials of degree \geq d. If I contains more monomials of degree d than (n-d)/(n-d+1) of the total number of square free monomials of S of degree d+1 then \depth_SI\leq d, in particular the Stanley’s Conjecture holds in this case.

Items 9

Proposition

Proposition 1

05D3

If I is generated by square free monomials of degree \geq d and
\rho_d(I)> ((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n\choose d} then \depth_SI\leq d.

Used by Remark 7
Proof of Proposition 1

Apply induction on n. If n=d then there exists nothing to show. Suppose that n>d. Let \nu_i be the number of the square free monomials of degree d from I\cap (x_i). We may consider two cases renumbering the variables if necessary.

Case 1 \nu_1>((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n-1\choose d-1}.

Let S':=K[x_2,\ldots,x_n] and x_1c_1,\ldots,x_1c_{\nu_1}, c_i\in S' be the square free monomials of degree d from I\cap (x_1). Then J=(I:x_1)\cap S' contains (c_1,\ldots,c_{\nu_1}) and so \rho_{d-1}(J)\geq \nu_1>((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n-1\choose d-1}. By induction hypothesis, we get \depth_{S'}J\leq d-1. It follows \depth_SJS\leq d and so \depth_SI\leq d by [R, Proposition 1.2].

Case 2 \nu_i\leq ((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n-1\choose d-1} for all i\in [n].

We get \sum_{i=1}^n\nu_i\leq n((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n-1\choose d-1}. Let A_i be the set of the square free monomials of degree d from I\cap (x_i). A square free monomial from I of degree d will be present in d-sets A_i and it follows

\rho_d(I)=|\cup_{i=1}^n A_i|\leq (n/d)((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n-1\choose d-1}= ((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n\choose d}

if n\geq d+1. Contradiction!

Remark

Remark 2

MESO

If I is generated by square free monomials of degree \geq d, then \depth_SI\geq d. Indeed, since I has a square free resolution the last shift in the resolution of I is at most n. Thus if I is generated in degree \geq d, then the resolution can have length at most n-d, which means that the depth of I is greater than or equal to d (this argument belongs to J. Herzog). Hence in the setting of the above proposition we get \depth_SI= d.

Corollary

Corollary 3

NK49

Let I be an ideal generated by \mu(I) square free monomials of degree d. If \mu(I)> ((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n\choose d} then \depth_SI= d.

Used by Example 4
Example

Example 4

EST0

Let I=(x_1x_2,x_2x_3)\subset S:=K[x_1,x_2,x_3]. Then d=2 and \mu(I)=2>(1/2){3\choose 2}. It follows that \depth_SI= 2 by the above corollary.

Example

Example 5

C0VF

Let I=(x_1x_2,x_1x_3,x_1x_4, x_2x_3,x_2x_5,x_3x_4,x_3x_5,x_4x_5)\subset \\ S:=K[x_1,\ldots,x_5]. Then d=2 and \mu(I)=8>(3/4){5\choose 2} and so \depth_SI=2.

Lemma

Lemma 6

D72K

Then \depth_SL_n=n-1 and \depth_S I_n=n-2.

Proof of Lemma 6

Apply induction on n\geq 3. If n=3 then L_3=(x_3,x_1), I_3=(x_1,x_2,x_3) and the result is trivial. Assume that n>3. Note that (L_n:x_n)=L_{n-1}S=(I_n:x_n) because f_n,f_{n-1}\in (L_n:x_n). We have

L_n=(L_n:x_n)\cap (x_n,L_n)=(L_{n-1}S)\cap (x_n,f_{n-1}),
I_n=(I_n:x_n)\cap (x_n,I_n)=(L_{n-1}S)\cap (x_n,f_{n-1},f_n)=(L_{n-1}S)\cap (x_n,u)\cap (x_1,x_{n-1},x_n),

where u=w/(x_1x_{n-1}x_n ). But (x_1,x_{n-1}) is a minimal prime ideal of L_{n-1}S and so we may remove (x_1,x_{n-1},x_n) above, that is I_n=(L_{n-1}S)\cap (x_n,u). On the other hand, (L_{n-1}S)+ (x_n,u)=(x_n,I_{n-1}) and (L_{n-1}S)+ (x_n,f_{n-1})=(x_n,L_{n-1})S because f_{n-1}\in L_{n-1}S. We have the following exact sequences

0\rightarrow S/L_{n}\rightarrow S/L_{n-1}S\oplus S/(x_n,f_{n-1})\rightarrow S/(x_n,L_{n-1}S)\rightarrow 0,
0\rightarrow S/I_{n}\rightarrow S/L_{n-1}S\oplus S/(x_n,u)\rightarrow S/(x_n,I_{n-1}S)\rightarrow 0.

By induction hypothesis \depth L_{n-1}=n-2 and \depth I_{n-1}=n-3 and so \depth_SS/(x_n,L_{n-1}S)=n-3, \depth_SS/(x_n,I_{n-1}S)=n-4. As \depth_S S/(x_n,f_{n-1})=\depth_S S/(x_n,u)=n-2, it follows \depth_SS/L_n=n-2, \depth_S S/I_n=n-3 by the Depth Lemma applied to the above exact sequences.

Remark

Remark 7

WZTW

If I is generated by \mu(I)>{n\choose d+1} square free monomials of degree d then \sdepth_SI=d. Since ((n-d)/(n-d+1)){n\choose d}\geq {n\choose d+1}, the Proposition 1 says that in a weaker case case \depth_SI\leq \sdepth_SI, which was in general conjectured by Stanley [S]. ´Stanley’s Conjecture holds for intersections of four monomial prime ideals of S by [AP] and [P1] and for square free monomial ideals of K[x_1,\ldots,x_5] by [P] (a short exposition on this subject is given in [P2]). It is worth to mention that Proposition 1 holds in the stronger case when \mu(I)>{n\choose d+1} (see [P3]), but the proof is much more complicated and the easy proof given in the present case has its importance.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1107.2621v3 by Dorin Popescu, under the licence CC0 1.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1107/1107.2621.jsonl.