In this paper we propose a new version of differential transform method (we shall call this method as \alpha-parameterized differential transform method), which differs from the traditional differential transform method in calculating coefficients of Taylor polynomials. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the efficiency and reliability of own method. The result reveal that \alpha-Parameterized differential transform method is a simple and effective numerical algorithm.
The sequence
is called the \alpha-P transformation of the original function f(x). The so-called ,,differential inverse" transform of D_{\alpha}(f) we define as
if the series is convergent, where x_{\alpha}=\alpha a+(1-\alpha)b.
In the cases of \alpha=1 \ \textrm{and} \ \alpha=0 the \alpha-p differential transform (?) reduces to the classical differential transform (?) at the points x=a \ \textrm{and} \ x=b respectively. Namely for \alpha=0 \ \textrm{and} \ \alpha=1 the equality \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)=f(x) is hold.
For practical application, instead of \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x) it is convenient to introduced N-term \alpha-parameterized approximation of the function \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x) which we shall define as
If f(x) is constant function then \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)=f(x) and \widetilde{f}_{\alpha,N}(x)=f(x) for each N.
If f(x)=c g(x), c \in \mathbb{R}, then D_{\alpha}(f)=c D_{\alpha}(g) \ \textrm{and} \ \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)=c \widetilde{g_{\alpha}}(x).
By applying the well-known properties of classical DTM we get
Consequently D_{\alpha}(f)=c D_{\alpha}(g), from which immediately follows that \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)=c \widetilde{g_{\alpha}}(x).
If f(x)=g(x)\pm h(x) then D_{\alpha}(f)=D_{\alpha}(g)\pm D_{\alpha}(h) \ \textrm{and} \ \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)= \widetilde{g_{\alpha}}(x)\pm \widetilde{h}_{\alpha}(x).
By using the definition of transform (?)
Consequently D_{\alpha}(f)=D_{\alpha}(g)\pm D_{\alpha}(h), from which immediately follows that \widetilde{f_{\alpha}}(x)= \widetilde{g}_{\alpha}(x)\pm \widetilde{h}_{\alpha}(x).
Let f(x)=\frac{d^{m}g}{dx^{m}} and m\in\mathbb{N}. Then
and
where x_{\alpha}=\alpha a+(1-\alpha)b.
We have from definition (?)
Thus we get D(f^{(m)},\alpha;k)=\frac{(k+m)!}{k!}D(f,\alpha;k+m). Using this we find \widetilde{f}_{\alpha}^{(m)}(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(k+m)!}{k!}D(f,\alpha;k+m)(x-x_{\alpha})^{k}.
Let f(x)=x^{m}, m\in\mathbb{N}. Then
Let k<m. By using the definition of the transform (?) we have
The equalities \ D(x^{m},\alpha;m)=1 and \ D(x^{m},\alpha;m+s)=0 for s\geq1 is obvious.
If f(x)=g(x) h(x) then D(f,\alpha;k)=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{k}[\alpha D_{a}(g;m)D_{a}(h;k-m)+(1-\alpha)D_{b}(g;m)D_{b}(h;k-m)]
By using the definition of transform given in Eq. (?) we have
(Application to boundary-value problem) Let us consider the differential equation
with the boundary conditions
Exact solution for this problem is
(Application to eigenvalue problems)We consider the following eigenvalue problem
Taking the \alpha-p differential transform of both sides (2) we find
Thus the following recurrence relation is obtained
Using definition of \alpha-p differential transform we get
Consuquently
Thus the boundary condition given in (2) can be transformed as follows
Similarly we have
and
In this case the boundary condition given in (2) can be written as follows
Let D(y,\alpha;0)=A \ \ \ \textrm{and} \ \ \ D(y,\alpha;1)=B. Substituting these values in (2) we have the following recursive procedure
Substituting (2) in (2)and (2) we find
and
respectively. In this case we have a linear system of the equations with respect to the variables A and B as
where P_{11}(\lambda):=\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}( A_{11}(\alpha-1)^{2\ell}+2\ell A_{12}(\alpha-1)^{2\ell-1})\frac{(-\lambda)^{\ell}}{(2\ell)!}, P_{12}(\lambda):=\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}( A_{11}(\alpha-1)^{2\ell+1}+(2\ell+1) A_{12}(\alpha-1)^{2\ell})\frac{(-\lambda)^{\ell}}{(2\ell+1)!}, P_{21}(\lambda):=\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}( A_{21}\alpha^{2\ell}+2\ell A_{22}\alpha^{2\ell-1})\frac{(-\lambda)^{\ell}}{(2\ell)!} and P_{22}(\lambda):=\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}( A_{21}\alpha^{2\ell+1}+(2\ell+1) A_{22}\alpha^{2\ell})\frac{(-\lambda)^{\ell}}{(2\ell+1)!}. Since the system (2)-(2) has a nontrivial solution for A and B the characteristic determinant is zero i.e.
Thus we have characteristic equation for eigenvalues by \alpha-p DTM Now, let us find the exact eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Sturm-Liouville problem (2)-(2). The general solution of equation (2) have the form
where \lambda=\mu^{2} and C, D are arbitrary constants. Applying the boundary conditions (2), (2) we get
Because we cannot have C=D=0, this implies
This is transcendental equation which is solved graphically. Let \mu=\mu_n, n\in \mathbb{N} are points of intersection of the graphs of the functions
The eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunctions are therefore given by
Now we consider special case of the Sturm-Liouville problem (2)-(2),
The eigenvalues of this problem are determined by the equation
This equation can be solved graphically by the points of intersections of the graphs of functions
as shown by the sequence (\mu_n) in Figure 1.
The eigenvalues of the considered problem are given by \lambda_n=\mu_{n}^{2} and corresponding eigenfunctions are given by
Taking the \alpha-p differential transform of both sides the equation (2) the following recurrence relation is obtained
Applying N-term \alpha-p differential transform the boundary conditions (2)-(2) are transformed as follows:
By using (2), (2) and (2) we obtain the following equalities (for N=6)
and
The text on this page is from arXiv:1507.03803v1 by K. Aydemir and O. Sh. Mukhtarov, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1507/1507.03803.jsonl.