arXiv reader

Nevanlinna theory for holomorphic curves from annuli into semi Abelian varieties

Si Duc Quang

arXiv
1910.05504v3 · PDF · 31 May 2022
Categories
math.CV
Journal
Mathematica Slovaca, 72 (2022), No. 2, 367-378
DOI
10.1515/ms-2022-0025
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

In this paper, we prove a lemma on logarithmic derivative for holomorphic curves from annuli into Kähler compact manifold and. As its application, a second main theorem for holomophic curves from annuli into semi abelian varieties intersecting with only one divisor is given.

Items 12

Lemma

Lemma 1.1

X9VD

Let N be a compact Kähler manifold with Kähler metric h and the associated form \Omega. Let f:{\mathbb{A}}(R_0)\rightarrow N be a holomorphic curve from annulus {\mathbb{A}}(R_0)\ (R_0>1) into N and let \omega\in H^{0}(N, \mathcal U^1_N). Setting f^{*}\omega =\xi (z)dz, we have

\bigl\|\ m_0(r,\xi )\le O\left(\log^+ T_{0,f}(r, \Omega )\right)+O\left(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right).
Used by Proof
Proof (Proof of Lemma 1.1) of Lemma 1.1

By Weil [W58, p. 101] (see also [Nog81]), there is a multiplicative meromorphic function \varphi on N and a holomorphic one form \omega_1 on N such that

\omega=d\log\varphi +\omega_1.

We set

f^*\omega_1=\xi_1dz\text{ and }f^*(d\log\varphi)=\xi_2dz,

where \xi_2=\frac{(\varphi\circ f)'}{\varphi\circ f}. Then we have

\begin{aligned} m_{0}(r,\xi)\le m_0(r,\xi_1)+m_0(r,\xi_2)+O(1). \end{aligned}

Firstly, we are going to estimate m_0(r,\xi_1). From the compactness of N, there is a positive constant C such that

|\omega_1(v)|^2\le C.h(v,v)\text{ for all holomorphic tangent vectors }v\in T_N.

Setting f^*\Omega=s(z)\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z, we have

|\xi_1(z)|^2\le C.s(z).

Hence, by some simple computations we have

\begin{aligned} m_0(r,\xi_1)\le&\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log(1+|\xi_1|^2)d\theta+\int\limits_{|z|=\frac{1}{r}}\log(1+|\xi_1|^2)d\theta+O(1)\\ \le& \frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log(1+s(z))d\theta+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log(1+s(x))d\theta+O(1)\\ \le&\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}sd\theta\right )+\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=\frac{1}{r}}sd\theta\right )+O(1)\\ =&\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{1}{2\pi r}\dfrac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1\le |z|<r}tsdt\wedge d\theta\right )\\ &+\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{r}{2\pi}\dfrac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{r}}tsdt\wedge d\theta\right )+O(1)\\ =&\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{1}{2\pi r}\dfrac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1\le |z|<r}f^*\Omega\right )+\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{r^3}{2\pi}\dfrac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{r}}f^*\Omega\right )+O(1)\\ \le&\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{1}{2\pi r}(\frac{1}{R_0-r}\int\limits_{1\le |z|<r}f^*\Omega)^2\right )\\ &+\frac{1}{2}\log\left (1+\frac{r^3}{2\pi}(\frac{1}{R_0-r}\int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{r}}f^*\Omega)^2\right )+O(1), \end{aligned}

for all r\in [0;R_0) outside an \Delta_{R_0}-set. Here the last inequality comes from the fact that \int\limits_{1\le |z|<r}f^*\Omega and \int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{r}}f^*\Omega are both monotone increasing functions in r\in [1;R_0) and Lemma 3.2 is applied. Moreover, we have

\int\limits_{1\le |z|<r}f^*\Omega=r\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\frac{d}{dt}\int\limits_{1\le |z|<t}f^*\Omega\ \text{ and }\ \int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{r}}f^*\Omega=r\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\frac{d}{dt}\int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{t}}f^*\Omega.

Then we have

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} m_0(r,\xi_1)&\le \log^{+}\left (\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\frac{d}{dt}\int\limits_{1\le |z|<t}f^*\Omega\right )+ \log^{+}\left (\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\frac{d}{dt}\int\limits_{1\ge |z|>\frac{1}{t}}f^*\Omega\right )\\ &\ \ \ +2\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}+O(1)\\ &\le 2\log^{+}\left (\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\frac{d}{dt}\int\limits_{\frac{1}{t}< |z|<t}f^*\Omega\right )+2\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}+O(1)\\ &\le 2\log^{+}\left (\frac{d}{dr}T_{0,f}(r;\Omega)\right )+2\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}+O(1)\\ &\le 2\log^+\left (\frac{1}{R_0-r}T_{0,f}(r;\Omega)\right )^2+2\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}+O(1)\\ &=4\log^+T_{0,f}(r;\Omega)+4\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}+O(1). \end{split} \end{aligned}

Here, the fourth inequality holds because of Lemma 3.2.

Now, we will estimate m_0(r,\xi_2). By Lemma 3.3 we have

\begin{aligned} \biggl\|\ m_0(r,\xi_2)=m_0\left(\frac{(\varphi\circ f)'}{\varphi\circ f}\right)\le O\left(\log^+T_{0}(r,\varphi\circ f)+\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right). \end{aligned}

Take \| .\|_1 and \| .\|_2 the Hermitian fiber metrics on L({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(\varphi)) and L({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi)) respectively. We take \sigma_1\in H^0(N,L({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(\varphi))) and \sigma_2\in H^0\left(N,L({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi))\right) so that {\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}(\sigma_1)={\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(\varphi), {\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}(\sigma_2)={\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi) and |\varphi|=\frac{\|\sigma_1\|_1}{\|\sigma_2\|_2}\le\frac{1}{\|\sigma_2\|_2} (because of compactness of N, we may suppose that \|\sigma_1\|_1\le 1 and \|\sigma_2\|_2\le 1). Then we have

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} m_0(r,\varphi\circ f)&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log\bigl (1+|\varphi\circ f|^2\bigl )d\theta+\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=\frac{1}{r}}\log\bigl (1+|\varphi\circ f|^2\bigl )d\theta +O(1)\\ &\le \frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log\frac{1}{\|\sigma_2\circ f\|_2}d\theta+\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=\frac{1}{r}}\log\frac{1}{\|\sigma_2\circ f\|_2}d\theta +O(1)\\ &=m_{0,f}(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi)). \end{split} \end{aligned}

On the other hand, we have

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^{\infty}(\varphi\circ f))&=N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}} (\sigma_2\circ f))\\ &=T_{0,f}(r,c_1({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi)))-m_{0,f}(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi))+O(1). \end{split} \end{aligned}

From (Proof), (Proof) and by Lemma 3.1, we have

T_{0}(r,\varphi\circ f)\le T_{0,f}(r,c_1({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(\varphi)))+O(1)= O(T_{0,f}(r,\Omega)).

Combining the above inequality with (Proof), we get

\begin{aligned} \biggl\|\ m_0(r,\xi_2)\le O\left(\log^+T_{0,f}(r,\Omega)+\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right). \end{aligned}

From (Proof), (Proof) and (Proof) we get

\biggl\|\ m_0(r,\xi) \le O(\log^+T_{0,f}(r,\Omega))+O\left(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right).

The lemma is proved.

Theorem

Theorem 1.2

ZPXD

Let f:{\mathbb{A}}(R_0)\rightarrow M be an algebraically non-degenerate holomorphic curve into a semi-Abelian variety M and let D be a reduced divisor on M. Then there exist a smooth equivariant compactification \overline M of M independent of f and a natural number k_0 such that

\begin{aligned} \bigl\|\ T_{0,f}(r; c_1(\overline D)) &= N_0^{[k_0]}(r, f^*D)+O\left (\log^+T_{0,f}(r; c_1(\overline D))+\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right). \end{aligned}
Proof (Proof of theorem 1.2) of Theorem 1.2

Without loss of generality we assume that D is irreducible. If \mathrm{St}(D)\not=\{0\}, by taking the quotient q: M\rightarrow M/\mathrm{St}(D) and deal with the holomorphic curve q\circ f:{\mathbb{A}}(R_0)\rightarrow M/\mathrm{St}(D) and the divisor D/\mathrm{St}(D), then we may reduce to the case where D is irreducible and \mathrm{St}(D)=\{0\}. Thus we may assume that D is irreducible and \mathrm{St}(D)=\{0\}.

By Lemma 4.1, there exists a smooth equivariant compactification \overline M of M, in which \overline D is generally positioned and big.

Let J_k(f):{\mathbb{A}}(R_0)\rightarrow J_k(\overline M, \log \partial M)\cong\overline M\times {\mathbb{C}}^{nk} be the k-jet lifting of f. We have the following claim from [Q12, Claim 6.1]

Claim.

There exists a number k_0 such that

\begin{aligned} \pi_2\big (J_{k_0}(\overline D, \log \partial M)\big )\cap \pi_2(\overline{J_{k_0}f({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\mathrm{Zar}})\not= \pi_2(\overline{J_{k_0}f({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\mathrm{Zar}}), \end{aligned}

where \overline{J_{k_0}f({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\mathrm{Zar}} is the Zariski closure of J_{k_0}f({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) ) in J_k(\overline M, \log \partial M).

Since the proof of this claim is just follow the proof of [Q12, Claim 6.1] with the same lines, we will omit its proof here.

Let \{U_\alpha\} be an affine open covering of \overline M such that

L(\overline{D})|_{U_\alpha} \cong U_\alpha \times {\mathbb{C}}.

We take \sigma \in H^{0}(\overline M,L(\overline D)) so that {\mathop{\mathrm{div}}} (\sigma )=\overline D and take local holomorphic functions \sigma_\alpha =\sigma|_{U_\alpha} given by the trivialization (Proof).

We fix a Hermitian metric \| \cdot \| in L(\overline D) and choose positive smooth functions h_\alpha on U_\alpha such that

\dfrac{1}{\|\sigma (x)\|}=\dfrac{h_\alpha(x)}{|\sigma_\alpha(x)|}, \qquad x\in U_\alpha.

By Claim Proof, there exists a polynomial R(w ) in variable

w=(w_{lk})\in \pi_2\left(\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right)\cong {\mathbb{C}}^{nk_0}

such that

\begin{aligned} \pi_2\left (J_{k_0}(\overline D,\log\partial M)\right )\cap\pi_2\left (\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right )&\subset\left\{w \in\pi_2\left (\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right )|\ R(w )=0\right\}\\ &\not=\pi_2\left (\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right ). \end{aligned}

Then we have an equation on every U_\alpha\times \pi_2\left (\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right ) of the form:

\begin{aligned}{} b_{\alpha 0}\sigma_\alpha +b_{\alpha 1}d\sigma_\alpha +\cdots +b_{\alpha k_0}d^{k_0}\sigma_\alpha=R(w ), \end{aligned}

where b_{\alpha i} are jet differentials on U_\alpha. Therefore, in every U_j\times \pi_2\left (\overline {J_{k_0}(f)({\mathbb{A}}(R_0) )}^{\text{Zar}}\right ), we have

\dfrac{1}{\|\sigma \|}=\dfrac{1}{|R|} \dfrac{h_\alpha}{|\sigma_\alpha|}=\dfrac{1}{|R|} \left| h_\alpha b_{\alpha 0}+h_\alpha b_{\alpha 1}\dfrac{d\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}+\cdots +h_\alpha b_{\alpha k_0}\dfrac{d^{k_0}\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}\right|.

Choose relatively compact open subsets U'_\alpha of U_\alpha so that \cup_\alpha U'_\alpha =\overline M. For every \alpha, there exist positive constants C_\alpha such that

h_\alpha|b_{\alpha i}|\le\sum_{\text{finite}}h_\alpha |b_{\alpha ilk\beta_{lk}(x)}|\cdot |w_{lk}|^{\beta_{lk}}\le C_\alpha\sum_{\text{finite}}|w_{lk}|^{\beta_{lk}}

for all x\in U'_\alpha.

By making C_\alpha larger if necessary, there exists d_\alpha >0 such that for f(z)\in U'_\alpha we have

h_\alpha (f(z))|b_{\alpha i}(J_{k_0}(f)(z))|\le C_\alpha \left(1+\sum_{\underset{1\le k\le k_0}{1\le l\le n}}\left| w_{lk}\circ J_{k_0}(f)(z)\right|\right)^{d_\alpha}.

Setting \xi_{(k)}=(w_{1k}(J_{k}(f)),\cdots ,w_{2k}(J_{k}(f))) and \xi_{l(k)}=w_{lk}(J_{k}(f)), for f(z) \in U'_\alpha we have

\dfrac{1}{\|\sigma (f(z))\|}\le\dfrac{1}{|R(\xi_{(1)}(z),\cdots ,\xi_{(k_0)}(z))|}\sum_{j=1}^{N}C_\alpha \left(1+\sum_{\underset{1\le k\le k_0}{1\le l\le n}}| \xi_{l (k)} (z)|\right)^{d_\alpha}
\quad\quad\quad\quad\times \left ( 1+\left| \dfrac{d\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}(J_1(f)(z))\right| + \cdots + \left| \dfrac{d^{k_0}\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}\left(J_{k_0}(f)(z)\right)\right| \right ).

This implies that

\begin{aligned} m_{0,f}(r;\overline D)&=\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\log^{+}\dfrac{1}{\|\sigma (f(re^{i\theta})\|}d\theta +\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\log^{+}\dfrac{1}{\|\sigma (f(\frac{1}{r}e^{i\theta})\|}d\theta +O(1)\\ &\le m_0\left (r,\dfrac{1}{R(\xi_{(1)}(z),\cdots ,\xi_{(k_0)}(z))}\right )\\ &+O\biggl (\sum_{\underset{1\le k\le k_0}{1\le l\le n}}\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\bigl (\log^+|\xi_{l(k)}(re^{i\theta })|+\log^+|\xi_{l(k)}(\frac{1}{r}e^{i\theta })|\bigl )d\theta\\ &+\sum_{\underset{1\le k\le k_0}{1\le \le n}}\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\bigl (\log^+\bigl |\dfrac{d^k\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}(J_k(f)(re^{i\theta })\bigl |+\log^+\bigl |\dfrac{d^k\sigma_\alpha}{\sigma_\alpha}(J_k(f)+(\frac{1}{r}e^{i\theta })\bigl )\bigl |d\theta\biggl )+O(1). \end{aligned}

By Lemma 1.1 and by (?) we have

\begin{aligned} \biggl\| \ m_0\left (r,\dfrac{d^k\sigma_j\circ f}{\sigma_j\circ f}\right )=O(\log^+T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D)))+O\left (\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right ). \end{aligned}

Combining Lemma 1.1, (Proof) and (Proof) we obtain

\begin{aligned} \biggl\| \quad m_{0,f}(r;\overline D)=O(\log^+T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D)))+O\left(\log\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right). \end{aligned}

We next estimate the counting function N_0(r, f^*D). We see that for all z\in{\mathbb{A}}(R_0),

{\mathrm{ord}}_zf^{*}D>k\Leftrightarrow J_k(f)(z)\in J_k(\overline D,\log\partial M).

Then, from (Proof) we have

{\mathrm{ord}}_zf^*D-\min\{{\mathrm{ord}}_zf^*D,k_0\}\le{\mathrm{ord}}_z{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}_0(R(\xi_{(1)},\cdots , \xi_{(k_0)})).

Thus

\begin{aligned} N_0(r,f^*D) - N^{[k_0]}_0(r,f^*D)\le N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}_0R(\xi_{(1)},\cdots ,\xi_{(k_0)})). \end{aligned}

By the first main theorem and by Lemma 1.1, we have

\begin{aligned} \|\ N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}_0R(\xi_{(1)},\cdots ,\xi_{(k_0)}))&\le T_0(r,R(\xi_{(1)},\cdots , \xi_{(k_0)}))+O(1)\\ &\le O\left(\sum_{\underset{1\le k\le k_0}{1\le l\le n}}T_0(r,\xi_{l(k)})\right )+O(1)\\ &=O\left(\sum_{\underset{0\le k\le k_0-1}{1\le l\le n}}m_0(r, \xi_{l(k)})\right )+O(1)\\ &=O(\log^+T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D)))+O\left(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right). \end{aligned}

By (Proof), we have

\begin{aligned} T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D))\le N_0(r,f^*D) +O(1). \end{aligned}

Combining (Proof), (Proof) and (Proof), we obtain

\biggl\|\ T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D))\le N^{[k_0]}(r,f^*D)+O(\log^+T_{0,f}(r;c_1(\overline D)))+O\left(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right).

The theorem is proved.

Definition

Definition 2.10 (see )

4RLE

We say that Y is generally positioned in X if the closure \overline Y of Y in X contains no M-orbit. If the support of a divisor E on a Zariski open subset of X is generally positioned in X, then E is said to be generally positioned in X.

Definition

Definition 2.11

0RJJ

Let Z be a subset of M. We define the stabilizer of Z by

\mathrm{St}(Z)=\{x\in M|x+Z=Z\}^0,

where \{\cdot\}^0 denotes the identity component.

Theorem

Theorem 3.1 (see )

OG1M

Let f : {\mathbb{A}}(R_0) \rightarrow V be a holomorphic curve into a complex projective manifold V and let H be a big line bundle on V.

Then

T_{0,f}(r; c_1(L))=O(T_{0,f}(r;c_1(H)))+O\left(\log \frac{1}{R_0-r}\right),

for every line bundle L on V.

Used by Proof
Lemma

Lemma 3.2

43X5

Let \varphi be a positive monotone increasing function in r\in [1;R_0)\ (R_0>1) Then for every \lambda >0, we have

\biggl\|\ \frac{d}{dr}(\varphi)\le \left (\frac{\varphi}{R_0-r}\right)^{\lambda +1}.
Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.2

Let E=\left\{r\in [1;R_0)\ :\ \frac{d}{dr}(\varphi)> \left (\frac{\varphi}{R_0-r}\right)^{\lambda +1}\right\}. Since \varphi is a monotone increasing function, its derivative \frac{d}{dr}(\varphi) exists almost everywhere. Hence E is a Borel measurable subset of [1;R_0). Then we have

\int\limits_E\frac{dt}{(R_0-r)^{\lambda +1}}\le \int\limits_E\frac{\varphi'}{\varphi^{\lambda +1}}dt\le \frac{1}{\lambda}\left (\frac{1}{\varphi^\lambda (1)}-\lim\limits_{r\rightarrow R_0^-}\frac{1}{\varphi^\lambda (r)}\right )=O(1).

The lemma is proved.

Lemma

Lemma 3.3 (see )

ZBO5

Let f be a nonzero multiplicative meromorphic function on {\mathbb{A}} (R_0). Then for each positive integer k and positive number \epsilon, we have

\biggl\|\ m_0\left (r,\dfrac{f'}{f}\right)\le (4+\epsilon)\log^+T_0(r,f)+O\left(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}\right).
Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.3

We denote by \omega the standard complex coordinate on \overline{{\mathbb{C}}}={\mathbb{C}}\cup{\infty} and consider the canonical Kähler form

\Psi_0=\frac{1}{(1+|\omega|^2)^2}\frac{i}{2\pi}d\omega\wedge d\bar\omega.

By Griffiths-King [GK, Proposition 6.9], we may choose suitably positive constants a,b and \delta\ (\delta <1) such that the form

\Psi=\frac{a(|\omega|+|\omega|^{-1})^{2+2\delta}}{(\log b(1+|\omega|^2))^2(\log b(1+|\omega|^{-2}))^2}\Psi_0

satisfies

{\mathrm{Ric}\,}\Psi\ge (|\omega|+|\omega|^{-1})^{-2\delta}\Psi.

Since f is multiplicative, it is easy to see that f^*\Psi is well-defined. We set

\begin{cases} &g=\dfrac{f'}{f},\ \zeta=\dfrac{a(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}{(\log b(1+|f|^2))^2(\log b(1+|f|^{-2}))^2}|g|^2,\\ &f^*\Psi=\dfrac{a(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}{(\log b(1+|f|^2))^2(\log b(1+|f|^{-2}))^2}|g|^2\dfrac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z=\zeta\dfrac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z. \end{cases}

On the other hand, we have

g^*{\mathrm{Ric}\,}\Psi=dd^c\log\zeta\ge (|f|+|f|^{-1})^{-2\delta}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z,

and

dd^c\log\zeta=f^*{\mathrm{Ric}\,}\Psi -\delta\left([{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f)]+[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(f)]\right)+[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(g)]-[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(g)]

in the sense of currents. By the definition, we have

[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^{\infty}(g)]=\left[\mathrm{Supp}\,({\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f)+{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(f))\right]\ge [{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f)]+[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(f)],

and hence we deduce

(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{-2\delta}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\le (1+\delta)\left([{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f)]+[{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^\infty(f)]\right)+dd^c\log\zeta.

Then, by the formula (?), we have

\begin{aligned}\int\limits_1^t&\frac{dt}{t}\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (t)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\le (1+\delta)\left(N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f))+N_0(r,{\mathop{\mathrm{div}}}^0(f))\right)\\ &+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log\zeta d\theta+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=1/r}\log\zeta d\theta -2\log\zeta\int\limits_{|z|=1}d^c\log\zeta -\frac{1}{2\pi}\log\zeta d\theta. \end{aligned}

By the definition of \zeta, we have

\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=r}\log\zeta d\theta+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{|z|=1/r}\log\zeta d\theta \le m_0(r,g)+\delta \left (m_0(r,f)+m_0\left(r,\frac{1}{f}\right)\right)+O(1).

Therefore, we get

\int\limits_1^t\frac{dt}{t}\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (t)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\le m_0(r,g)+2(1+\delta)T_0(r,f)+O(1).

For simplicity, we set \Gamma=\{|z|=r\}\cup\{|z|=1/r\}. We now have the following estimate

\begin{aligned} \|\ m_0(r,g)&=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{\Gamma (r)}\log^+\bigl ((\zeta(|f|+|f|^{-1}))^{-2\delta} (\log (1+|f|^2))^2(\log (1+|f|^{-2}))^2\bigl )d\theta +O(1)\\ & \le\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\limits_{\Gamma (r)}\log^+(\zeta(|f|+|f|^{-1}))^{-2\delta} d\theta +\log^{+}\bigl (m_0(r,f)+m_0(r,\frac{1}{f})\bigl)+O(1)\\ &\le\frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{\Gamma (r)}\log^+\bigl(\zeta(|f|+|f|^{-1})\bigl)^{-2\delta} d\theta\biggl)+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(1)\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{1}{2r}\biggl (\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (r)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\biggl )\biggl )+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(1)\\ &\le \frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{1}{2r}\biggl (\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (r)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\biggl )^2\biggl )\\ &\hspace{20pt}+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r})\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{1}{2r}\biggl (r\frac{d}{dr}\int\limits_{1}^r\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (t)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z\biggl )^2\biggl )\\ &\hspace{20pt}+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r})\\ &\le\frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{r}{2}(\int\limits_{1}^r\int\limits_{{\mathbb{A}} (t)}\frac{\zeta}{(|f|+|f|^{-1})^{2\delta}}\frac{i}{2\pi}dz\wedge d\bar z)^4\biggl )\\ &\hspace{20pt}+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r})\\ &\le\frac{1}{2}\log\biggl (1+\frac{r}{2}(m_0(r,g)+2(1+\delta)T_0(r,f))^4\biggl )\\ &\hspace{20pt}+2\log^{+}T_0(r,f)+O(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r})\\ &\le 2\log^+m_0(r,g)+4\log^+T_0(r,f)+O(\log^+\frac{1}{R_0-r}). \end{aligned}

We note that, for every non negative function \psi (r) and \epsilon' >0, \log^+\psi (r)\le \epsilon' \psi(r)+O(1). Then we have

\|\ m_0(r,g)\le 2\epsilon' m_0(r,g)+4\log^+T_0(r,f)+O(\log r)+O(1),
i.e., \|\ m_0(r,g)\le\frac{4}{1-2\epsilon'}T_0(r,f)+O(\log r)+O(1).

Choosing \epsilon'=\frac{1}{2}(1-\frac{4}{4+\epsilon}), we get

\|\ m_0(r,g)\le (4+\epsilon)T_0(r,f)+O(\log r)+O(1).

The lemma is proved.

Lemma

Lemma 4.1 (see )

808B

Let M be a semi-Abelian variety and let D be an algebraic divisor on M such that \mathrm{St}(D)=\{0\}. Then there exists a smooth equivariant compactification \overline M of M such that the closure \overline D of D in \overline M is big, generally positioned.

Used by Proof

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1910.05504v3 by Si Duc Quang, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1910/1910.05504.jsonl.