Invariance under ambient isotopy and the spherical move R4 is immediate since these moves do not alter the crossing data of K. Thus it suffices to check invariance of V_G(K) under R1',R2,R3. This follows from V_G being an invariant when defined on framed (long) knots. For completeness, we also prove by hand that V_G is a framed knotoid invariant below:
Since the oriented versions of R1' do not change the signs of crossings, invariance of V_G(K) under R1' follows from
(\delta_g\otimes e)(1\otimes g) = \delta_g\otimes g = (1\otimes g)(\delta_g\otimes e)
\hspace{0.5em}\text{ and }\hspace{0.5em}
(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(1\otimes g) = \delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes g = (1\otimes g)(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e).
The move R2 has four oriented versions. The move R3 has eight. For brevity we consider only one of each; see Figure ?. The proofs for the other orientations are analogous.
The paper has a figure here, which this page does not show.
On the left-hand side of the R2 move in Figure ? there are two crossings. For each orientation of R2, one is positive and the other negative. To find invariance we must show that the contributions from these crossings cancel. Indeed, the bottom arc gives a contribution
(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(\delta_h\otimes e)
=
\begin{cases}
\delta_h\otimes e &\quad \text{ if } g^{-1}=h,\\
0 &\quad \text{ otherwise.}
\end{cases}
The top arc gives a contribution (1\otimes g)(1\otimes h) which is thus (1\otimes e) for nonzero contributions. Noting that \sum_h(\delta_h\otimes e)=1\otimes e we see that the contribution of the bottom arc is also trivial, as required.
To verify invariance under the R3 move in Figure ?, we calculate the contributions of both sides and show they are equal. When running through K, suppose we pass through the vertical line first, then through the line going diagonally up, and finally through the strand going diagonally down (other orders are proven analogously). Then we compute V_G(K) on the left-hand side to be
\begin{aligned}
V_G(K) &= \sum_{g,h,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes g)(1\otimes h)\dots(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(1\otimes k)\dots(\delta_{h^{-1}}\otimes e)(\delta_{k^{-1}}\otimes e)\\
&= \sum_{g,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes g)(1\otimes k)\dots(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(1\otimes k)\dots(\delta_{k^{-1}}\otimes e).
\end{aligned}
Here the (\dots) are generic placeholder for contributions due to the rest of K. Now we drag the term (\delta_{k^{-1}}\otimes e) towards the middle contribution. Every time an element of the form (1\otimes x) is encountered, the argument of \delta_{k^{-1}} is conjugated by x^{-1}. Thus we find
\begin{aligned}
V_G(K) &= \sum_{g,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes g)(1\otimes k)\dots(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(1\otimes k)(\delta_{wk^{-1}w^{-1}}\otimes e)\dots\\
&= \sum_{g,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes g)(1\otimes k)\dots(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(\delta_{kwk^{-1}w^{-1}k^{-1}}\otimes e)(1\otimes k)\dots,
\end{aligned}
for some word w on G. This implies that g^{-1}=kwk^{-1}w^{-1}k^{-1}. Thus we conclude
V_G(K) = \sum_{k,\dots} \dots(1\otimes kwkw^{-1})\dots(\delta_{kwk^{-1}w^{-1}k^{-1}}\otimes k)\dots
Following the same procedure on the right-hand side (with the labels g,h,k attached to the same crossings as before) we find
\begin{aligned}
V_G(K) &= \sum_{g,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes k)(1\otimes g)\dots(1\otimes k)(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)\dots(\delta_{k^{-1}}\otimes e)\\
&= \sum_{g,k,\dots}\dots(1\otimes k)(1\otimes g)\dots(1\otimes k)(\delta_{g^{-1}}\otimes e)(\delta_{wk^{-1}w^{-1}}\otimes e)\dots\\
&= \sum_{k,\dots} \dots(1\otimes kwkw^{-1})\dots (1\otimes k)(\delta_{wk^{-1}w^{-1}}\otimes e)\dots\\
&= \sum_{k,\dots} \dots(1\otimes kwkw^{-1})\dots(\delta_{kwk^{-1}w^{-1}k^{-1}}\otimes k)\dots.
\end{aligned}
(Note that w here is the same word as in the left-hand side computation!) We thus conclude that V_G is indeed invariant under R3, completing the proof.