Example 1
GR39If x^l+b_{l-1}x^{l-1}+\cdots+b_0 is a Pisot polynomial, b_l=1, k=a_0=0, then (?) is a sequence of Salem polynomials.
We introduce a sequence P_d of monic reciprocal polynomials with integer coefficients having the central coefficients fixed as well as the peripheral coefficients. We prove that the ratio between number of nonunimodular roots of P_d and its degree d has a limit L when d tends to infinity. We show that if the coefficients of a polynomial can be arbitrarily large in modulus then L can be arbitrarily close to 0. It seems reasonable to believe that if the coefficients are bounded then the analogue of Lehmer’s Conjecture is true: either L = 0 or there exists a gap so that L could not be arbitrarily close to 0. We present an algorithm for calculation the limit ratio and a numerical method for its approximation. We estimated the limit ratio for a family of polynomials. We calculated the limit ratio of polynomials correlated to many bivariate polynomials having small Mahler measure.
If x^l+b_{l-1}x^{l-1}+\cdots+b_0 is a Pisot polynomial, b_l=1, k=a_0=0, then (?) is a sequence of Salem polynomials.
(Erdős, Turán) Let F(x)=\sum_{k=0}^d a_kx^k\in \mathbb{C}[x] with a_da_0 \ne 0, and let
Then for all 0\le \alpha<\beta \le 2\pi,
If k>0 is an integer and b_j=b_l-j, j=0,1,\ldots,l then for all fixed integers a_j, j=1, \ldots,k there is a limit C(P_{2n+2l}) when n tends to infinity.
Let the limit of C(P_{2n+2l}) when n tends to infinity be called limit ratio and denoted LC(P_{2n+2l}).
Let T_{2n+8,m} denote
If we use the notation introduced in the previous example then
If b_0=b_1=\cdots=b_l=1 is valid in (?) then
Let \varphi_A(x) denote the polynomial (x^A-1)/(x-1), and write
Let H_{2n+2l}(x) denote
If m is an integer greater than 1 then
If A is an adherent point of the sequence LC(P_{m,1}(x))_{m>1} then
There is the limit of the sequence LC(P_{m,1}(x))_{m>1} satisfying
If N is a natural number \ge 1 there is some c(N)>0 such that any sequence P_{2n+2l} of integer polynomials defined in (?), having coefficients \le N in modulus, that has the limit ratio strictly below c(N) has the limit ratio equal to 0.
The text on this page is from arXiv:2203.07710v1 by Dragan Stankov, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2203/2203.07710.jsonl.