arXiv reader

On the metric Kollár-Pardon problem

Vasily Rogov

arXiv
2401.07983v1 · PDF · 15 January 2024
Categories
math.DG, math.AG, math.GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Let (M, g) be a compact real analytic Riemannian manifold and \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{M} can be realised as a manifold definable in an o-minimal structure \Sigma expanding \mathbb{R}_{\mathrm{an}} in such a way that the pullback metric \widetilde{g}:=\pi^*g is \Sigma-definable. For instance, this is the case when \widetilde{M} can be realised as a semi-algebraic submanifold in \mathbb{R}^n in such a way that the coefficients of the metric \widetilde{g} are semi-algebraic. We show that there exists a definable smooth map \widetilde{M} \to \widetilde{K} to a compact simply connected \Sigma-definable space \widetilde{K} such that its regular fibres are Riemann locally homogeneous with respect to the metric \widetilde{g}. We deduce that under these assumptions \pi_1(M) is quasi-isometric to a locally homogeneous space. In the case when M is aspherical we show that (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) is a homogeneous Riemannian manifold. A similar result in the setting of complex algebraic geometry was earlier conjectured by Kollár and Pardon ([KP]). Using our results, we prove the conjecture of Kollár-Pardon in the special case of smooth aspherical varieties admitting a bi-definable Kähler metric and discuss the analogues of this conjecture in other branches of geometry.

Items 52

Conjecture

Conjecture 1 (Kollár-Pardon)

W9IW

Let X be a smooth complex projective variety and \pi \colon \widetilde{X} \to X its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{X} is biholomorphic to an open real semi-algebraic subset \Omega inside a complex algebraic variety Z. Then \widetilde{X} \simeq F \times \mathbb C^n \times D, where D is a symmetric bounded domain and F is a simply connected projective variety.

Theorem

Theorem A

WL29

[Theorem 3.2] Let M be a compact real analytic manifold and g a real-analytic Riemannian metric on M. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be the universal cover and \widetilde{g}:=\pi^*g the induced metric on it. Assume that \widetilde{M} admits a structure of a manifold definable in an o-minimal structure \Sigma in such a way that \widetilde{g} is \Sigma-definable. Then there exists a \Sigma-definable simply connected compact topological space \widetilde{K} and a \Sigma-definable real analytic map \Phi \colon \widetilde{M} \to \widetilde{K}, such that the regular fibres of \Phi are Riemannian locally homogeneous manifolds with respect to the metric \widetilde{g}.

Used by Example 2
Theorem

Theorem B

497Z

[Theorem 3.9] Assume M, \ g and \widetilde{M} are as in Theorem A. Assume moreover that \widetilde{M} is contractible. Then \widetilde{K} is a point and (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) is a Riemannian homogeneous manifold.

Theorem

Theorem C

KJL2

Let X be a smooth complex projective variety with universal cover \pi \colon \widetilde{X} \to X. Assume that \widetilde{X} admits a structure of a definable complex manifold in some o-minimal structure. Assume moreover that X is aspherical and admits a bi-definable Kähler metric, that is, a Kähler Hermitian metric h=g + \sqrt{-1}\omega such that \pi^*h is definable on \widetilde{X}. Then (\widetilde{X}, \pi^*h) is a Kähler homogeneous manifold. In particular, the Kollár-Pardon Conjecture holds for X.

Definition

Definition 1

V20I

A structure \Sigma is a collection (\Sigma_n)_{n \in \mathbb N}, where each \Sigma_n is a boolean algebra of subsets of \mathbb R^n and the following holds:

  • (i) if A \in \Sigma_n and B \in \Sigma_m, then A \times B \in \Sigma_{n+m};

  • (ii) if A \in \Sigma_n and p_i \colon \mathbb R^{n} \to \mathbb R^{n-1} is the standard projection

    (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto (x_1, \ldots x_{i-1},x_{i+1} \ldots, x_{n-1}),

    then p_i(A) \in \Sigma_{n-1};

  • (iii) every semi-algebraic subset A \subseteq \mathbb R^n is in \Sigma_n. Recall, that A is semi-algebraic if it can be defined using a finite system of real polynomial inequalities.

The elements of \Sigma_n are called (\Sigma-)definable sets. If A \in \Sigma_n and B \in \Sigma_m are two definable sets, then a map f \colon A \to B is called definable if its graph \Gamma_f \subseteq A \times B is definable.

Theorem

Theorem 2.1

JLMZ

Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure.

  • (i) A \Sigma-definable set is connected if and only if it is path-connected;

  • (ii) definable sets admit finite cell decomposition: every definable A \subset \mathbb R^n can be written as A = A_1 \sqcup \ldots \sqcup A_k, where each A_j \subseteq A is a locally closed definable subset definably homeomorphic to \mathbb R^{n_j}. In particular, every definable set has finitely many connected components and is homotopically equivalent to a finite CW-complex;

  • (iii) definable functions are piecewise-continuous; moreover, if A is a definable set and f \colon A \to \mathbb R is a definable map, for every k \ge 0 there exists a finite decomposition A = A_1 \sqcup \ldots \sqcup A_m into definable locally closed sets A_j such that f|_{A_j} is of class \mathcal{C}^{k};

  • (iv) if A \subseteq \mathbb R is a definable subset of \mathbb R and f \colon A \to \mathbb R is a definable function, then its derivative f' is definable whenever it exists.

Remark

Remark 1

UJXD

Item (ii) of Theorem 2.1 can be strengthened as the following. Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure and A \subseteq \mathbb R^n a definable subspace.Then for every k\ge 0 there exists a decomposition of A into a disjoint union of locally closed subsets

A= A_1 \sqcup \ldots \sqcup A_k

and a collection of maps \theta_j \colon A_j \to \mathbb R^{n_j}, where each \theta_j is a definable homeomorphism of class \mathcal{C}^k. In particular, every A_j is a \mathcal{C}^k-submanifold of \mathbb R^n. For the proof see Theorem 6.6 in [Cos]. In [RSW] the authors showed that one can replace k with \infty if \Sigma is a so-called structure generated by a quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman class (in what follows we will call it of QA type, following the abbreviation in [RSW]). The structures \mathbb R_{alg}, \mathbb R_{an}, \mathbb R_{exp} and \mathbb R_{an,exp} are all of QA type.

Definition

Definition 3

DN9X

Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure and X a topological space. A \Sigma-definable atlas \xi=(U_{\alpha}, \phi_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in A} is a finite collection of open charts U_{\alpha}, \ X = \bigcup_{\alpha} U_{\alpha} and homeomorphic embeddings \phi_{\alpha} \colon U_{\alpha} \to \mathbb R^{n}, such that

  • (i) \phi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta}) are \Sigma-definable in \mathbb R^n for every \alpha and \beta;

  • (ii) the transition functions \phi_\beta \circ \phi_{\alpha}^{-1} \colon \phi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta}) \to \phi_{\beta}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta}) are \Sigma-definable.

A \Sigma-definable topological space is a topological space X with a fixed equivalence class of \Sigma-definable atlases.

Lemma

Lemma 2.2

XKO5

Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure and X be \Sigma-definable space. Then for every k\ge0, there exists a stratification by definable locally closed subsets

\varnothing=S_0 \subset \ldots \subset S_r=X,

such that \dim S_{i-1}<\dim S_{i} and each V_i:=S_i\setminus S_{i-1} is a \mathcal{C}^k-definable manifold (with respect to the induced definable structure). If, moreover, \Sigma is of QA type (see Remark 1), one can also take k=\infty.

Proof of Lemma 2.2

We argue by induction on \dim X. If \dim X = 0 there is nothing to prove. In general, from Theorem 2.1, (ii) and Remark 1 it follows that we can find a \mathcal{C}^k- (and \mathcal{C}^{\infty}-, if \Sigma is of QA type) cellular decomposition

X=X_1 \sqcup \ldots \sqcup X_p.

Let I=\{i_1, \ldots, i_q\} be the set of indices of cells of non-maximal dimension, that is \dim X_{i_j}<\dim X if and only if i_j \in I. Put S_{r-1}:= \bigcup_{i\in I} X_i. Then V_r:=X \setminus S_{r-1}=\bigsqcup_{j \notin I} X_j is a union of non-interesecting definable \mathcal{C}^k- (respectively \mathcal{C}^{\infty}-) manifolds. At the same time, \dim S_{r-1}< \dim X, so the induction assumption applies to it.

Lemma

Lemma 2.3

AW8X

Let X be a topological space and \xi a \Sigma-definable atlas on X for an o-minimal structure \Sigma. Assume that \pi_1(X) is finite. Then the following holds:

  • (i) The universal cover \widetilde{X} admits a unique \Sigma-definable atlas \widetilde{\xi} such that the covering map p \colon \widetilde{X} \to X is definable;

  • (ii) if Y is a simply connected \Sigma-definable space and f \colon Y \to X is continuous and \Sigma-definable, the canonical lifting \widetilde{f} \colon Y \to \widetilde{X} is \Sigma-definable.

Proof of Lemma 2.3

Let U_{\alpha} \in \xi. By Theorem 2.1, (ii) there exists a finite covering of U_{\alpha} by open \Sigma-definable simply connected V^{\alpha}_{\beta}, \ U_{\alpha} = \bigcup_{\beta} V^{\alpha}_{\beta}. The cover p \colon \widetilde{X} \to X splits over V^{\alpha}_{\beta}, that is, p^{-1}(V^{\alpha}_{\beta})\simeq V^{\alpha}_{\beta} \times \{1, \ldots, k\}. Here we use that p^{-1}(V^{\alpha}_{\beta}) has finitely many connected components since \pi_1(X) is finite and p is a finite cover. Each of these connected components is homeomorphic to V^{\alpha}_{\beta}. The connected components of preimages of V^{\alpha}_{\beta} for all \alpha and \beta give rise to a definable atlas \widetilde{\xi} on \widetilde{X} with local coordinates \phi_{\alpha} \circ p. The projection p is definable since in a finite collection of definable charts V^{\alpha}_{\beta} it coincides with the projection V^{\alpha}_{\beta} \times \{1, \ldots, k\} \to V^{\alpha}_{\beta}.

To prove (ii) notice that the graph \Gamma_{\widetilde{f}} \subset Y \times \widetilde{X} is nothing but the preimage of the graph \Gamma_f \subset Y \times X under the (definable) map id \times p \colon Y \times \widetilde{X} \to Y \times X. Therefore, \widetilde{f} is definable whenever f is.

Definition

Definition 4

46QW

Let M be a definable smooth manifold and E \to M a smooth rank d vector bundle. A definable structure on E is a finite definable cover M= \bigcup U_{\alpha} (i.e., each U_{\alpha} is open definable) and a collection of trivialisations \psi_{\alpha} \colon E|_{U_{\alpha}} \xrightarrow{\sim} U_{\alpha} \times \mathbb R^d, such that the transition functions \psi_{\beta} \circ \psi_{\alpha}^{-1} are definable. We say that a section s \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(M, E) is definable if it is definable in the local definable charts. A definable vector bundle over a definable manifold is a vector bundle with a chosen definable structure.

Proposition

Proposition 2.4

G6TE

Let M be a definable smooth manifold, E \to M a definable vector bundle. Then:

  • (i) E^*, \ \Lambda^kE, \ \operatorname{Sym}^kE carry natural definable structures;

  • (ii) if F is another definable vector bundle, then E \otimes F, \ Hom(E, F), \ E \oplus F carry natural definable structures;

  • (iii) the trace morphism \operatorname{tr} \colon E \otimes E^* \to \mathbb R_M is definable;

  • (iv) a morphism f \colon F \to E is definable if and only if it is definable as a section of Hom(E, F);

  • (v) a morphism f \colon E \to F is definable if and only if it determines a definable map \operatorname{Tot}(E) \to \operatorname{Tot}(F). If \operatorname{ker} f (resp. \operatorname{coker} f) is a vector bundle, it carries a natural definable structure;

  • (vi) if N is a definable manifold and f \colon N \to M is a definable smooth map, then f^*E carries a natural definable structure;

Proposition

Proposition 2.5

E5T5

Let M be a definable manifold. Let (U_{\alpha}, \phi_{\alpha}) be a definable atlas on M. Then

d\phi_{\alpha} \colon TM|_{U_{\alpha}} \to T\phi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha})=\phi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha}) \times \mathbb R^n

defines a definable structure on TX, called the canonical definable structure;

Proof of Proposition 2.5

Without loss of generality, we may assume that \phi_{\alpha} are all open embeddings. Then d\phi_{\alpha}^{-1}(\partial/\partial x_i) defines trivialisations of TM|_{U_{\alpha}}. The rest of the Proposition follows from the fact that the derivatives of definable smooth functions are definable and computations in the local coordinates.

Proposition

Proposition 2.6

TV32

Let M be a smooth definable manifold and E \to M a definable smooth vector bundle.

  • (i) if \nabla is a definable connection on E, then for every definable section s \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(M, E) the section \nabla s \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(M , E \otimes T^{*}M) is definable;

  • (ii) if g is a definable metric on M, its Levi-Civita connection is definable.

Proof of Proposition 2.6

(i). Let s_{\alpha}=s|_{U_{\alpha}}. Then \nabla(s_{\alpha})=ds_{\alpha}+P_{\alpha}s_{\alpha}. Both summands are definable: the second one because of the definability of P_{\alpha}, and the first one because the derivative of a definable function is definable (Theorem 2.1, (iv)) and ds_{\alpha} can be expressed via partial derivatives of the components of s_{\alpha} with respect to local definable trivialisations.

(ii). Choose a definable chart U with definable coordinates (x^1, \ldots, x^n). On this chart, \nabla can be written as d+\Gamma, where the elements of the tensor \Gamma are Christoffel symbols \Gamma_{i,j}^k. Those are expressed in terms of the partial derivatives of g along the basis vector fields:

\Gamma_{i,j}^k = \frac{1}{2}g^{kl} \left( \frac{\partial g_{li}}{\partial x^j} + \frac{\partial g_{lj}}{\partial x^i} - \frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^l} \right ).

The functions g^{a,b} are definable with respect to x^c and a derivation of a definable function is definable. Hence \nabla is definable.

Definition

Definition 5

LJDL

Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. We define the class of Weyl invariants among the tensors on M as the following:

  • g is a Weyl invariant;

  • the curvature tensor R_g is a Weyl invariant;

  • if \tau is a Weyl invariant and \nabla is the Levi-Civita connection, \nabla \tau is a Weyl invariant;

  • a linear combination of Weyl invariants is a Weyl invariant;

  • if \tau \in (TM)^{\otimes p} \otimes (T^*M)^{\otimes q} is a Weyl invariant, then its image under any tensorial convolution

    (TM)^{\otimes p} \otimes (T^*M)^{\otimes q} \to (TM)^{\otimes (p-k)} \otimes (T^*M)^{\otimes (q-k)}

    is a Weyl invariant.

Corollary

Corollary 2.7

FHDZ

Let M be a definable smooth manifold and g a definable Riemannian metric on it. Then every Weyl invariant on (M, g) is definable.

Uses Definition 1 · Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 2.8 (Prüfer-Tricerri-Vanhecke)

HG9B

Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold. There exists a constant k depending only on \dim M and a collection of smooth functions

w_i \colon M \to \mathbb R, \ i = 1, \ldots, k,

such that (M,g) is locally homogeneous if and only if each w_i is constant. Moreover, every w_i is a Weyl invariant in the sense of definition 5.

Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 2.9 (Console-Olmos)

WKYB

Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold and let

W_M=(w_1, \ldots, w_k) \colon M \to \mathbb R^k

be as above. Then the following holds:

  • (i) every Killing vector field on (M, g) is tangent to the level sets of W_M;

  • (ii) if N \subseteq M is a non-critical level set of W_M, then (N, g|_N) is a locally homogeneous Riemann manifold;

  • (iii) for every W_M-non-critical point x \in M there exists a neighbourhood U of x and a collection of Killing vector fields \xi_1, \ldots, \xi_r \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(U, TM|_U) that generate \operatorname{Ker} dW_M as an \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(U)-module.

Used by Remark 2, Proof, Proof
Remark

Remark 2

VRD3

For technical reasons, we will need to apply Console-Olmos theorem not only to smooth manifolds but also to manifolds of \mathcal{C}^m-class with m arbitrary large. This difficulty arises only if we do not assume our o-minimal structure \Sigma to be of QA type (see Remark 1). This causes no harm since Theorem 2.9 is still valid for \mathcal{C}^m-manifolds with \mathcal{C}^m-Riemannian metric if m \gg k(n)=\frac{n(n-1)}{2}, where n=\dim M (it is sufficient that p-th partial derivatives of the coefficients of the metric in local coordinates exist and are continuous for p<k(n)).

Definition

Definition 6

EX86

Assume that \Sigma_1 and \Sigma_2 are o-minimal structures and \Sigma_2 is an expansion of \Sigma_1. Let M_1 (respectively M_2) be a \Sigma_1-definable (respectively \Sigma_2-definable) topological space. Let \phi \colon M_2 \to M_1 be a continuous map. We say that a subset S\subseteq M_1 is strongly bi-definable if S is definable in M_1 and \phi^{-1}(S) is definable in M_2. We say that a map f \colon M_1 \to T to a \Sigma_1-definable space T is bi-definable if f is \Sigma_1-definable and \phi^*f \colon M_2 \to T is \Sigma_2-definable.

Proposition

Proposition 3.1

RLS0

Let i \colon N \hookrightarrow M be a strongly bi-definable subset. Let \widetilde{N}:=\pi^{-1}(N). The following holds:

  • (1) for any ring R the cohomology algebra H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, R) is finitely generated;

  • (2) The image of i_*\colon \pi_1(N) \to \pi_1(M) is of finite index in \pi_1(M).

Proof of Proposition 3.1

The item (i) follows from the finite cell decomposition for \widetilde{N} (Theorem 2.1, (iii)). To see (ii) note that (i) implies that \widetilde{N} has finitely many connected components and the connected components of \widetilde{N} are in bijection with \pi_1(M)/i_*(\pi_1(N)).

Theorem

Theorem 3.2

TMTT

Let M be a compact real analytic manifold and g a real analytic Riemann metric on M. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be the universal cover and \widetilde{g}:=\pi^*g. Assume that \widetilde{M} is a definable manifold and that \pi^*g is a definable Riemannian metric on it. Then there exists a compact simply-connected definable space \widetilde{K} and a smooth definable map \Phi \colon \widetilde{M} \to \widetilde{K} such that every non-critical level set of \Phi is a locally homogeneous Riemannian manifold with respect to the metric \widetilde{g}. Moreover, if x \in \widetilde{M} is a non-critical point, the level sets of \Phi in a neighbourhood U of x are given by orbits of a connected Lie group locally acting by isometries on U.

Uses Definition 1 · Used by Corollary 3.4
Proof of Theorem 3.2

Let W_{\widetilde{M}} to be the Console-Olmos map of (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}). Let K \subseteq \mathbb R^k be the image of W_{\widetilde{M}}. By Corollary 2.7 the map W_{\widetilde{M}} is definable. In particular, K is definable in \mathbb R^k and the fibres of W_{\widetilde{M}} are definable subspaces of \widetilde{M}.

Notice that W_{\widetilde{M}} coincides with the pullback \pi^*W_{M} of the Console-Olmos map of (M,g). Indeed, \pi \colon (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) \to (M, g) is a local isometry, therefore each point x \in \widetilde{M} has a neighbourhood U, such that W_{\widetilde{M}}|_U = (\pi^*W_M)|_U. Hence K= W_M(M) is compact since M is compact.

Let p \colon \widetilde{K} \to K be the universal cover of K and \Phi \colon \widetilde{M} \to \widetilde{K} be the canonical lifting of W_{\widetilde{M}}. We get a diagram:

\xymatrix{ \widetilde{M} \ar[rr]^{\Phi} \ar[rrd]^{W_{\widetilde{M}}} \ar[d]_{\pi} && \widetilde{K} \ar[d]^{p} \\ M \ar[rr]_{W_M} && K }

Since W_{\widetilde{M}} is definable, its fibres have finitely many connected components. At the same time, W_{\widetilde{M}}=p \circ \Phi, so the fibres of p have finitely many connected components as well. This means that \pi_1(K) is finite and by Lemma 2.3 the topological space \widetilde{K} can be endowed with a definable structure in such a way that \Phi \colon \widetilde{M} \to \widetilde{K} is definable. Since \widetilde{K} is a finite cover of K and K is compact, \widetilde{K} is compact as well. The rest of the claim follows immediately from Console-Olmos theorem (Theorem 2.9)

Remark

Remark 3

WKP2

One should clarify what is meant by non-critical points and non-critical level sets of \Phi, since a priori \Phi is just a map to a topological space. In fact, the target \widetilde{K} of \Phi is definable and by Remark 1 there exists a dense open definable subset U \subset \widetilde{K} which is a definable \mathcal{C}^2 manifold. Therefore the differential d\Phi is well-defined on \Phi^{-1}(U). We say that x \in M is critical (respectively that a level set N = \Phi^{-1}(y), \ y \in \widetilde{K}, is critical), if \Phi(x) \in U and d\Phi|_{x} is not surjective (respectively if y \in U and d\Phi|_{x} is not surjective for some x \in N).

Example

Example 1

OW3G

Let g be a Riemannian metric on the two-dimensional sphere S^2 such that

\operatorname{Isom}(S^2, g) \simeq \operatorname{U}(1).

More explicitly, one can take f \colon [-1;1] \to \mathbb R to be an analytic function with

\begin{cases} f(-1)=f(1)=0\\ f(t)>0, \ -1 <t <1. \end{cases}

Let (M, g) be the surface of revolution of the graph of f inside \mathbb R^3 with the induced metric. Then M is diffeomorphic to S^2 and if f is generic enough, the only isometries of (M,g) are given by rotations around the z-axis.

The Console-Olmos map in this case is the projection onto the z-axis

W_M \colon M \to [-1;1].

The non-critical fibres W_M^{-1}(t), t \neq \pm 1 are isometric to S^1 with the standard homogeneous metric (up to scaling), while the critical fibres W_M^{-1}(-1) and W_M^{-1}(1) are just points.

Notice that M is simply connected, therefore (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g})=(M, g) and (M, g) admits a natural structure of a definable Riemannian manifold in \mathbb R_{an}.

Example

Example 2

BLVG

The previous example formally satisfies the assumptions of Theorem A, although not very interesting from our perspective, since in this case \pi_1(M)=\{1\}. Here is a way to modify this example in order to get examples with interesting fundamental groups.

Let S be a two-dimensional sphere and g_S be a metric on it as in Example 1. Let (M_0, g_0) be a compact locally homogeneous Riemannian manifold. Take M:= M_0 \times S with the product metric g=(g_0 \times g_S).

The universal cover \widetilde{M_0} of M_0 can be identified with a homogeneous space G/K. The proof of [BKT], Lemma 2.1 can be easily adapted to show that \widetilde{M_0}=G/K carries canonical \mathbb R_{\mathrm{alg}}-definable structure. The metric g_0 pullbacks to a semi-algebraic homogeneous metric \widetilde{g_0} on \widetilde{M_0}. This implies that the universal cover of (M, g) is isometric to (\widetilde{M_0} \times S, \widetilde{g_0}\times g_S) and is an \mathbb R_{an}-definable Riemannian manifold.

The Console-Olmos map for (M, g) is the composition of the projection on S and the Console-Olmos map for S:

\xymatrix{ M=M_0 \times S \ar[r]^{p_S} \ar[rd]_{W_M} & S \ar[d]_{W_S}\\ & [-1;1]. }

In particular the non-critical fibres of W_M are isometric to locally homogeneous manifolds M_0 \times S^1, while the critical fibres W_M^{-1}(\{-1\}) and W_M^{-1}(\{1\}) are isometric to (M_0, g_0). One can further modify the geometry of M such that it does not split as a direct product anymore: instead of taking a product metric g_0 \times g_S one can take a skew-product metric (p^*_Se^{\phi})g_0 \times g_S where \phi \colon S \to \mathbb R is a real-analytic function.

Proposition

Proposition 3.3

E842

Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure and (M, g) a \Sigma-definable Riemannian manifold of class \mathcal{C}^m for m\gg \frac{n(n-1)}{2}, where n=\dim M. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be a cover of M and \widetilde{g}:=\pi^*g. Assume that (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) is a definable Riemannian manifold. Then for every k, \ m> k >0 there exists a stratification of M by locally closed strongly bi-definable subsets

\varnothing = S_0 \subset \ldots \subset S_r=M,

such that each V_i:= S_i \setminus S_{i-1} is a \mathcal{C}^k-submanifold of M that admits definable locally trivial fibrations f_i \colon V_i \to K_i with locally homogeneous fibres onto a definable topological space K_i. If, moreover, \Sigma is of QA type, the same holds for k=\infty.

Proof of Proposition 3.3

The proof is done by induction on \dim M. If \dim M=0, the statement is clear. Otherwise, let W_M \colon M \to \mathbb R^n be the Console-Olmos map of (M,g) and K=W_M(M). This map exists (see Remark 2) and its regular fibres are locally homogeneous. It is moreover bi-definable with respect to the map \widetilde{M} \to M since the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 applies.

Let K^{\circ} \subset K be the set of non-critical values of W_M. Clearly, K^{\circ} is an open dense definable subset and M^{\circ}:=W_M^{-1}(K^{\circ}) is an open dense definable submanifold of M. In fact, M^{\circ} is strongly bi-definable since \pi^{-1}(M^{\circ})=W_{\widetilde{M}}^{-1}(K^{\circ}) is definable in \widetilde{M}.

Let N:= M \setminus M^{\circ}. This is a closed strongly bi-definable subset of M. Notice that \dim N < \dim M. In fact, N=S_{r-1} will be the first step of our stratification.

By Lemma 2.2 we can find a stratification of N by definable locally closed subsets N_i, \ \varnothing=N_0 \subset \ldots \subset N_s =N.

We claim that in fact, we can choose all N_i to be strongly bi-definable. Indeed, one can choose N_{s-1} to be the singular locus of N. Clearly \pi^{-1}(N_{s-1}) is the singular locus of the definable subset \pi^{-1}(N) \subset \widetilde{M}, hence N_{s-1} is strongly bi-definable and we proceed by induction on \dim N.

Now for every i the set U_i:=N_i\setminus N_{i-1} is a definable Riemannian \mathcal{C}^k-manifold with definable cover \pi_i \colon \widetilde{U_i} = \pi^{-1}(U_i) \to U_i and \pi_i^*g=\widetilde{g}|_{\widetilde{U_i}} is definable. Finally, notice that \dim U_i \le \dim N < \dim M. Therefore, we may apply the induction assumption to U_i and for each U_i get stratifications

\varnothing = S^i_0 \subset \ldots \subset S^i_{r_i}

with the required properties. It is left to gather all nested stratifications S^i_j into a single stratification S_p of M. For this one can put S_p:= \bigcup_{\dim S^i_j =n_p} S^i_j, where \{n_p\} is the set of natural numbers appearing as dimensions of the strata of S^i_j.

For each (V_i:= S_i \setminus S_{i-1}, g|_{V_i}) the Console-Olmos map f_i:=W_{V_i} \colon V_i \to K_i has no critical fibres, therefore defines a locally trivial fibration with locally homogeneous fibres.

Corollary

Corollary 3.4

E9R5

In the assumptions of Theorem 3.2 the manifold M can be written as a disjoint union of strongly bi-definable locally homogeneous manifolds.

Proof of Corollary 3.4

Take the union of all the fibres of the maps f_i, where f_i are as in Proposition 3.3.

Corollary

Corollary 3.5

70VG

Let \Sigma be an o-minimal structure and (U, g) a \Sigma-definable Riemannian manifold. Let \Gamma be a finitely generated group. Assume that \Gamma acts on (U, g) by isometries and the action is free, cocompact and properly discontinuous. Then \Gamma is quasi-isometric to a locally homogeneous space.

Proof of Corollary 3.5

Let M:=U/\Gamma and p \colon U \to M the projection. The metric g descends to a Riemannian metric \overline{g} on M. Since U \to M is a \Gamma-Galois cover, we have a surjective homomorphism \pi_1(M) \to \Gamma.

Let w_M \colon M \to K be the Console-Olmos map on (M, \overline{g}) and F \subset M a connected component of a non-critical fibre of w_M. Denote by \Gamma_F the image of the composition homomorphism \pi_1(F) \to \pi_1(M) \to \Gamma. The connected components of p^{-1}(F) are in bijection with \Gamma/\Gamma_F. On the other hand, p^{-1}(F) consists of several connected components of a fibre of the Console-Olmos map w_U \colon (U, g) \to K', hence definable. It follows that \pi_0(p^{-1}(F)) = \Gamma/\Gamma_F is finite. Therefore, \Gamma is quasi-isometric to \Gamma_F.

Let \widetilde{F} be a connected component of p^{-1}(F). The group \Gamma_F acts on (\widetilde{F}, g|_{\widetilde{F}}) by isometries and the action is free and properly discontinuous with a compact quotient F=\widetilde{F}/\Gamma_F. By Milnor-Švarc Lemma ([BH], Proposition 8.19) this implies \Gamma_F is quasi-isometric to (\widetilde{F}, g|_{\widetilde{F}}). By the Console-Olmos Theorem (Theorem 2.9) (\widetilde{F}, g|_{\widetilde{F}}) is locally homogeneous.

Proposition

Proposition 3.6

U4D7

Let M be a finite-dimensional compact connected CW-complex and N \subseteq M a closed connected subcomplex. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be the universal cover and \widetilde{N}:=\pi^{-1}(N) the preimage of N in it. Assume that the cohomology algebra H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is finitely generated. Then there exists a finite connected cover q \colon M' \to M and a connected subcomplex N' \subseteq M', \ q(N') = N, such that the action of \pi_1(N') on H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is trivial.

Proof of Proposition 3.6

Note that we do not assume \widetilde{N} to be connected. Nevertheless, \widetilde{N} has only finitely many connected components since its cohomology algebra is finitely generated, and

\pi_0(\widetilde{N})=\pi_1(M)/i_*\pi_1(N)

is finite (here i\colon N \hookrightarrow M is the tautological embedding).

Let \Gamma:=\pi_1(M). Since \widetilde{N} is a \Gamma-Galois cover of N, the action of \pi_1(N) on H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) factors through the natural homomorphism \pi_1(N) \to \pi_1(M)=\Gamma. At the same time, if H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is finitely generated, it is a finite-dimensional \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z-algebra and the group \operatorname{Aut}(H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is finite. Let G be the image of \pi_1(N) in \operatorname{Aut}(H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)). Consider the composition of homomorphisms of groups

\pi_1(N) \to \Gamma \to G \hookrightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)).

Let q \colon M' \to M be the finite G-Galois cover of M associated to the group homomorphism \pi_1(M)=\Gamma \to G \subseteq \operatorname{Aut}(H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)). Let N':=q^{-1}(N). Notice that N' is connected since both \pi_1(N) and \pi_1(M) map to G surjectively. Of course the universal cover \widetilde{M} \xrightarrow{\pi} M factors through M' \xrightarrow{q} M and \widetilde{N} \to N factors through N' \to N. At the same time, the action of \pi_1(N') on H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is trivial.

Lemma

Lemma 3.7

M2GD

Let \Gamma be a finitely generated group and M a compact manifold which is a K(\Gamma, 1). Let N \subseteq M be a closed submanifold. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be the universal cover and \widetilde{N}:=\pi^{-1}(N). Assume that H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is finitely generated. Then N=M.

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.7

First of all, notice that we can replace M and N with M' and N' as in Proposition 3.6 so that the action of \pi_1(N) on H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is trivial. Indeed, M' will be still aspherical, will have the same universal cover, and N'=M' if and only if N=M. Therefore, starting from now we assume that \pi_1(N) acts trivially on the cohomology algebra of \widetilde{N}.

Since \widetilde{N} is a \Gamma-Galois cover of N, the \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z-cohomology groups of N can be computed using the Cartan-Leray spectral sequence ([McCl], Theorem 8^{bis}.9):

E_2^{i,j}=H^i(\Gamma, H^j(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)) \implies H^{i+j}(N, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z).

Since we assume that the H^{j}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)’s are trivial \pi_1(N)-modules and the action of \pi_1(N) on \widetilde{N} factors through \Gamma, each H^j(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is a finite-dimensional \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z-vector space with trivial \Gamma-action and H^i(\Gamma, H^j(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z))=H^i(\Gamma, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) \otimes_{\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z}H^j(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z). Let n:=\dim M. The compact manifold M is a K(\Gamma, 1) space, thus H^n(\Gamma, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)=\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z and H^{n+i}(\Gamma, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)=0 for i>0.

Let r be maximal integer such that H^r(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is non-zero. Consider

E_2^{n,r}=H^n(\Gamma, H^r(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z).

It is non-zero, since it equals

H^n(\Gamma, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) \otimes H^r(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)=H^r(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z).

At the same time

E_2^{n-2,r+1}=H^{n-2}(\Gamma, H^{r+1}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z))=0

and

E_2^{n+2, r-1}=H^{n+2}(\Gamma, H^{r-1}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)=0.

Therefore E_2^{n,r} survives in the spectral sequence and H^{n+r}(N, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is non-zero. We assumed that N is a closed manifold, so H^p(N, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) vanishes for p>\dim N. It follows that n+r \le \dim N. Of course \dim N \le \dim M=n and it follows that n+r=\dim N, that is, \dim N=\dim M and r=0. Since M was assumed to be connected and N is a closed submanifold, we deduce that N=M.

Corollary

Corollary 3.8

J55X

Let M be a compact aspherical real analytic manifold and \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{M} admits a structure of a manifold definable in an o-minimal structure. Then M has no strongly bi-definable strict submanifolds.

Proof of Corollary 3.8

If N \subseteq M is strongly be-definable, \pi^{-1}(N)=:\widetilde{N} \subseteq \widetilde{M} is definable. In particular, H^{\bullet}(\widetilde{N}, \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z) is finitely generated by Theorem 2.1, (ii). The Corollary then follows from Lemma 3.7.

Theorem

Theorem 3.9

4IOF

Let (M,g) be a compact analytic Riemannian manifold and \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{M} admits a structure of a manifold definable in an o-minimal structure and the metric \widetilde{g}:= \pi^*g is definable. Assume further that \widetilde{M} is contractible, that is, M is aspherical. Then (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) is a Riemannian homogenous space.

Proof of Theorem 3.9

Let W_{M} \colon M \to \mathbb R^k be the Console-Olmos map. Let N \subseteq M be a connected component of a non-critical level set of W_M. Then N is a smooth submanifold of M and in the same time, it is strongly bi-definable: \pi^{-1}(N) is a union of several connected components of a level set of the Console-Olmos map W_{\widetilde{M}} of (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}). However, by Corollary 3.8 this implies N=M and the map W_M is constant. Since (\widetilde{M}, \widetilde{g}) is complete and simply connected, it is homogeneous by Prüfer-Tricerri-Vanhecke theorem (Theorem 2.8).

Corollary

Corollary 3.10

36X7

Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold with a non-positive sectional curvature. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be the universal cover and \widetilde{g}:=\pi^*g. Assume that \widetilde{M} admits a structure of a \Sigma-definable manifold for some o-minimal structure \Sigma such that \widetilde{g} is \Sigma-definable. Then (M, g) is locally homogeneous.

Proof of Corollary 3.10

The universal cover \widetilde{M} is contractible by Cartan-Hadamard Theorem ([BH], Ch. 4), so the statement follows from Theorem 3.9.

Corollary

Corollary 3.11

PII2

Let X be a smooth algebraic variety and \pi \colon \widetilde{X} \to X be its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{X} admits a structure of a definable complex manifold in some o-minimal structure. Assume moreover, that X is aspherical and admits a bi-definable Kähler metric, that is, a Kähler Hermitian metric h=g + \sqrt{-1}\omega such that \pi^*h is definable on \widetilde{X}. Then (\widetilde{X}, \pi^*h) is a Kähler homogeneous manifold. In particular, Conjecture 1 holds for X.

Proof of Corollary 3.11

Let \widetilde{h}=\pi^*h and \widetilde{h}=\widetilde{g}+\sqrt{-1}\widetilde{\omega}. Here \widetilde{g} is a Riemannian metric on \widetilde{X} which is the real part of \widetilde{h}, and \widetilde{\omega} is a symplectic form which is the imaginary part of \widetilde{h}. Being the real part of a definable tensor, \widetilde{g} is definable. Theorem 3.9 implies that (\widetilde{X}, \widetilde{g}) is homogeneous as a Riemannian manifold. Let \xi be a Killing vector field on \widetilde{X}. Since the form \widetilde{\omega} is harmonic with respect to \widetilde{g}, its Lie derivative along \xi vanishes. This implies that any one-parameter subgroup of diffeomorphisms of \widetilde{X} that preserves \widetilde{g}, preserves also \widetilde{\omega}. Hence it preserves the complex structure operator J_{\widetilde{X}} as well. We deduce that if G is a Lie group that acts by isometries and transitively on \widetilde{X}, its action preserves the complex structure. Therefore, \widetilde{X} is homogeneous not only as Riemannian but also as a complex (and as a Kähler) manifold.

Question

Question 1

1TJ4

Let M be a compact smooth manifold and \tau a tensor on M. Let \pi \colon \widetilde{M} \to M be its universal cover. Assume that \widetilde{M} admits a definable structure such that \pi^*\tau is definable. Is it true that there exists a definable simply connected space K and a definable smooth map \Phi \colon \widetilde{M} \to K, such that \operatorname{Ker} d\Phi is locally generated by vector fields preserving \tau?

Uses Definition 1 · Used by Question 2
Question

Question 2

H0TC

In the assumptions of Question 1, is it true that if \widetilde{M} is contractible, there exists a Lie group G acting transitively on \widetilde{M} and preserving \tau?

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2401.07983v1 by Vasily Rogov, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2401/2401.07983.jsonl.