arXiv reader

Isometry groups of simply connected nonunimodular Lie groups of dimension four

Youssef Ayad

arXiv
2501.17009v2 · PDF · 21 May 2025
Categories
math.DG
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

For each left-invariant Riemannian metric on simply connected nonunimodular Lie groups of dimension four, we determine the full group of isometries.

Items 55

Definition

Definition 2.1

AKJC

The group \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g \cong \operatorname{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})_g is called the group of isometric automorphisms of G.

Definition

Definition 2.2

6T1T

A Lie group G is said to be of type (R) if, for every element x in the Lie algebra \mathfrak{g} of G, the endomorphism \operatorname{ad} x : \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{g}, defined by y \mapsto [x, y], has only real eigenvalues. Some authors refer to this condition by saying that \mathfrak{g} has only real roots.

Lemma

Lemma 2.3

BU86

(Lemma 2.2 in [ha2012isometry]). The group L(G) of left translations on G is a normal subgroup of \operatorname{Isom}(G, g) if and only if \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e = \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g.

Used by Proof
Lemma

Lemma 2.4

BHU0

(Corollary (5.3) in [gordon1988isometry]). Let G be a simply connected solvable Lie group whose Lie algebra has only real roots. Let g and g' be two left-invariant metrics on G. Then g is isometric to g' if and only if g' = \psi^{\ast} g for some \psi \in \operatorname{Aut}(G).

Used by Proof
Lemma

Lemma 2.5

Y9RM

(Lemma 11.2. page 62 in [helgason]). Let M be a Riemannian manifold, \phi and \psi two isometries of M onto itself. Suppose there exists a point p \in M for which \phi(p) = \psi(p) and d_p\phi = d_p\psi. Then \phi = \psi.

Used by Proof, Remark 5.2
Theorem

Theorem 2.6

7CW5

Let G be a simply connected solvable Lie group of type (R), then for each left invariant Riemannian metric g on G, \operatorname{Isom}(G, g) \cong G \rtimes \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g.

Used by Remark 2.7
Proof of Theorem 2.6

According to the lemma 2.3, it suffices to show that \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e = \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g. Let \theta \in \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e, then \theta(e) = e and \theta^{\ast}g = g, i.e. g(u, v) = g(\theta_{\ast}^{-1}u, \theta_{\ast}^{-1}v) \,\, \forall u, v\in \mathfrak{g}. On the other hand, since G is a simply connected solvable Lie group of type (R), we have by lemma 2.4, \psi^{\ast}g = g for some \psi \in \operatorname{Aut}(G), i.e. g(u, v) = g(\psi_{\ast}^{-1}u, \psi_{\ast}^{-1}v) \,\, \forall u, v\in \mathfrak{g}. Hence \theta_{\ast} = d_e\theta = \psi_{\ast} = d_e\psi and \theta(e) = \psi(e) = e. By lemma 2.5, we have:
\theta = \psi \in \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g. Therefore \operatorname{Isom}(G, g) \cong G \rtimes \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g. (See page 192 in [ha2012isometry]).

Remark

Remark 2.7

YHS3

All the Lie algebras in Table 1 are solvable. We will focus on those of type (R) and use the preceding theorem to describe their isometry groups. In fact, as we will show in the following proposition, only four Lie algebras from Table 1 are not of type (R).

Proposition

Proposition 2.1

2IMY

All the Lie algebras from Table 1 are solvable of type (R) except the following four Lie algebras: \operatorname{A}_{3, 7}^{\alpha} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1, \operatorname{A}_{4, 6}^{\alpha, \beta}, \operatorname{A}_{4, 11}^{\alpha} and \operatorname{A}_{4, 12}.

Proof of Proposition 2.1

For the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{3, 7}^{\alpha} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1, the endomorphism \operatorname{ad} e_3 is represented by the matrix

\operatorname{ad} e_3 = \begin{bmatrix} -\alpha & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & -\alpha & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

We see that \operatorname{ad} e_3 has two complex eigenvalues which are -\alpha + i and -\alpha - i.
For the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{4, 6}^{\alpha, \beta}, the endomorphism \operatorname{ad} e_4 is represented by the matrix

\operatorname{ad} e_4 = \begin{bmatrix} -\alpha & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -\beta & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & -\beta & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

We see that \operatorname{ad} e_4 has two complex eigenvalues which are -\beta + i and -\beta - i.
For the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{4, 11}^{\alpha}, the endomorphism \operatorname{ad} e_4 is represented by the matrix

\operatorname{ad} e_4 = \begin{bmatrix} -2\alpha & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & -\alpha & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

Thus, \operatorname{ad} e_4 has two complex eigenvalues which are -\alpha + i and -\alpha - i.
For the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{4, 12}, the endomorphism \operatorname{ad} e_4 is represented by the matrix

\operatorname{ad} e_4 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

Therefore, the element \operatorname{ad} e_4 has two complex eigenvalues which are \pm i.
For all other Lie algebras in Table 1, one can easily verify that \operatorname{ad} e_i, for all i = 1, \dots, 4, have only real eigenvalues.

Remark

Remark 3.1

1QXU

The simply connected Lie groups associated with these Lie algebras will be described in details in the following subsections.

Proposition

Proposition 3.1

XD1A

We can realize the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} as a semidirect sum \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R} where \sigma_{\alpha}(t) = \begin{bmatrix} -t & 0\\ 0 & -t\alpha \end{bmatrix}.

Proof of Proposition 3.1

Consider the following basis \mathscr{B} = \left\lbrace X, Y, Z\right\rbrace of \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R} where

X = \left(\begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, 0 \right), \quad Y = \left(\begin{bmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, 0 \right), \quad Z = \left(\begin{bmatrix} 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, 1 \right).

We recall that if (x, t), (y, r) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R}, where x, y \in \mathbb{R}^2 and t, r \in \mathbb{R}. Then their bracket is given by

[(x, t), (y, r)] = \big([x, y]_{\mathbb{R}^2} + \sigma_{\alpha}(t)(y) - \sigma_{\alpha}(r)(x), [t, r]_{\mathbb{R}}\big)

where [, ]_{\mathbb{R}^2} and [, ]_{\mathbb{R}} are the brackets in \mathbb{R}^2 and \mathbb{R} respectively. According to this fact, we obtain that the brackets of elements of \mathscr{B} are

[X, Y] = 0, \qquad [X, Z] = X, \qquad [Y, Z] = \alpha Y.

These are exactly the brackets of the Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha}. Hence \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R}.

Proposition

Proposition 3.2

I8B7

The Lie algebra \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} is isomorphic to \mathfrak{g}_c for some c \in \mathbb{R}, in fact we have

\operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{c}}\mathbb{R} \cong \mathfrak{g}_c.
Proof of Proposition 3.2

It is clear that the Lie algebra \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{\alpha}}\mathbb{R} is not isomorphic to \mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes_{\sigma_{I}}\mathbb{R}; Because if they are isomorphic, then there exists a matrix P \in \operatorname{GL}(2, \mathbb{R}) = \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{R}^2) myeditcolorand a nonzero real number \lambda such that \sigma_{I}(\lambda t) = P\sigma_{\alpha}(t)P^{-1}. This means that \sigma_{I}(\lambda t) and \sigma_{\alpha}(t) have the same eigenvalues, this implies that t = 0 or \lambda = -1 and \alpha = 1. Both cases are impossible because \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} is not abelian and 0 < |\alpha| < 1. Therefore \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} is isomorphic to \mathfrak{g}_c for some c \in \mathbb{R}. In fact, put \lambda = -\frac{1 + \alpha}{2} and c = \frac{4\alpha}{(1 + \alpha)^2}. Then the matrix \sigma_{c}(\lambda t) has eigenvalues -t and -\alpha t. Consequently \sigma_{c}(\lambda t) is similar to \sigma_{\alpha}(t) and hence \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} and \mathfrak{g}_c are isomorphic.

Proposition

Proposition 4.1

5GH0

The following map is bijective

\begin{array}{rcl} \varphi : \operatorname{Tsup}_{n}&\longrightarrow& \operatorname{S}_{n}\\ B &\longmapsto& (B^{-1})^t(B^{-1}) \end{array}
Proof of Proposition 4.1

It is clear that the map \varphi is well defined. For the injectivity, let B, C \in \operatorname{Tsup}_{n} such that \varphi(B) = \varphi(C). This is equivalent to the following equality B^{-1}C = (C^{-1}B)^{t}. Put M = C^{-1}B, then B^{-1}C = (C^{-1}B)^{t} \Leftrightarrow M^{-1} = M^{t}. Since \operatorname{Tsup}_{n} is a group, then M, M^{-1} \in \operatorname{Tsup}_{n}. Since M^{-1} = M^{t} \in \operatorname{Tinf}_n, then M \in \operatorname{Tsup}_n \cap \operatorname{Tinf}_n = \operatorname{D}_n^{+}. Hence we have M^{-1} = M^{t} = M, then M = I_n. This implies that B = C and \varphi is injective.
For the surjectivity, let A \in \operatorname{S}_{n} and consider the inner product on \mathbb{R}^{n} defined by

\langle u, v\rangle = u^{t}Av, \forall u, v \in \mathbb{R}^{n}.

Let \mathcal{B} = \left\lbrace e_1, ..., e_n\right\rbrace be the canonical basis of \mathbb{R}^{n}. The Gram-Schmidt procedure produces an orthonormal basis \mathscr{B} = \left\lbrace v_1, ..., v_n\right\rbrace of the Euclidean space \left( \mathbb{R}^{n}, \langle ., .\rangle\right) such that

[v_1, ..., v_n] = X \in Tsup_n.

This means that Xe_i = v_i. Since \mathscr{B} = \{v_1, ..., v_n\} is an orthonormal basis of (\mathbb{R}^n, \langle ., . \rangle), then

\operatorname{Mat}\left(\langle ., .\rangle , \mathscr{B}\right) =X^tAX = I_n.

Thus A = (X^{-1})^{t}(X^{-1}) = \varphi(X). Hence \varphi is surjective.
Therefore \varphi is a bijection. This result was already proven in [van2017metrics].

Proposition

Proposition 4.2

8LNC

[van2017metrics] The set of inner products on \mathfrak{g} is (n^2 + n)/2-dimensional, and can be identified with the set of upper triangular matrices with positive diagonal entries.

Remark

Remark 5.1

DRKL
  1. In each nonunimodular 4-dimensional Lie group, we will investigate different metrics that yield different isometry groups. This means that for any other metric, its isometry group is isomorphic to that of one of the investigated metrics.

  2. In this paper, we choose the first class of metrics to be the one with the maximal group of isometric automorphisms.

Remark

Remark 5.2

CBRJ

The isotropy subgroup \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e is compact. If \theta is an element of \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e, the differential \theta_{\ast} = d_e\theta : \mathfrak{g} \longrightarrow \mathfrak{g} of \theta at e is an orthogonal transformation on the vector space \mathfrak{g} = T_eG. That is, for any x, y \in T_eG: g(\theta_{\ast}^{-1}x, \theta_{\ast}^{-1}y) = g(x, y).
Therefore, by lemma 2.5, \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e can be injected in \operatorname{O}(\mathfrak{g}, g). Hence

\operatorname{Aut}(G)_g \subset \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e \subset \operatorname{O}(4), \quad (\text{see page 193 in \cite{ha2012isometry}}).

Throughout this paper, \operatorname{O}(n) denotes the orthogonal group in n dimensions.

Uses Lemma 2.5 · Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 5.3

WBI7

The group of isometric automorphisms of G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2 is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_1} &= \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, \pm1, \operatorname{O}(2)\right\rbrace \\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \operatorname{O}(2)\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_3} &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_4} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \textcolor{myeditcolor}{\operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_5}} &= \textcolor{myeditcolor}{\left\lbrace I_4\right\rbrace.} \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.3

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{2} \oplus 2\operatorname{A}_1 = \operatorname{Lie}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ a_5 & a_6 & 0 & 0\\ a_9 & 0 & a_{11} & a_{12}\\ a_{13} & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}.

We first note that, by Remark 5.2, for any left-invariant Riemannian metric on the Lie group G, we have \operatorname{Aut}(G)_g \subset \operatorname{O}(4). This implies that a_5 = a_9 = a_{13} = 0 in A. Therefore, it suffices to consider automorphisms of the form A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & a_6 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & a_{11} & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}. Let A be an automorphism of this form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_6 = \pm1, \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}\\ a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix} \in \operatorname{O}(2). \end{aligned}

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_1} = \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, \pm1, \operatorname{O}(2)\right\rbrace.
For the metric M_2, we have

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_2} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_2A = M_2\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_6 = 1, \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}\\ a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix} \in \operatorname{O}(2). \end{aligned}

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_2} = \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, 1, \operatorname{O}(2)\right\rbrace \cong \operatorname{O}(2).
For the metric M_3, one can see that

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_3} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_3A = M_3\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_6 = a_{11} = \pm1, a_{12} = a_{15} = 0, a_{16} = \pm1 \end{aligned}

Thus

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_3} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

For the metric M_4, one gets that

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_4} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_4A = M_4\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_{12} = a_{15} = 0, a_6 = a_{11} = 1, a_{16} = \pm1 \end{aligned}

Thus

\operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_4} = \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, 1, 1, -1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

myeditcolorFinally, it is easy to verify that the automorphism \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, 1, 1, -1\right\rbrace does not preserve M_5. Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right)_{M_5} = \left\lbrace I_4\right\rbrace.

Corollary

Corollary 5.4

FM5O

The isometry group of G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2 is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2, M_1\right) &\cong& \left( G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right) \rtimes \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, \pm1, \operatorname{O}(2)\right\rbrace\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2, M_2\right) &\cong& \left( G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right) \rtimes \operatorname{O}(2) \\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2, M_3\right) &\cong& \left( G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right) \rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2, M_4\right) &\cong& \left( G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \textcolor{myeditcolor}{\operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2, M_5\right)} &\cong& \textcolor{myeditcolor}{\left( G_{2.1} \times \mathbb{R}^2\right).} \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.5

YRBW

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_2 are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_1} &\cong& \mathbf{D}(4)\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_3} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_4} &= \{I_4\}. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.5

The automorphism group of \operatorname{2A_2} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_2) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ a_5 & a_6 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix} \quad \text{or}\quad \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & a_{7} & a_{8}\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ a_{13} & a_{14} & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of G_2 of the above form , then we obtain that

\begin{aligned} & A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_1}\hspace{13cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A^tM_1A = M_1\hspace{13cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A \in \left\lbrace \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \hspace{2.4cm}\\ & \cup \left\lbrace \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \hspace{2cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A \in \left\langle \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \right\rangle \cong \mathbf{D}(4). \hspace{7cm} \end{aligned}

Therefore \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_1} \cong \mathbf{D}(4). This the maximal group of isometric automorphisms on the Lie group G_2. For the metric M_2, it suffices to verify which of the elements of \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_1} preserve the metric M_2. We obtain that

\begin{aligned} & A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_2}\hspace{10cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A^tM_2A = M_2\hspace{10cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \cong \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2. \end{aligned}

Similarly we can see that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_3} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_3A = M_3 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, 1, 1, -1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Finally, one can easily verify that: A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_4} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_4A = M_4 \Leftrightarrow A = I_4.

Remark

Remark 5.6

SKLK

If we choose the metric U = \begin{bmatrix} \alpha & 0 & \gamma & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \mu & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \quad \alpha, \mu > 0, \quad \gamma \neq 0.
Its associated symmetric positive definite matrix is M_{\gamma} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{\alpha^2} & 0 & \frac{-\gamma}{\alpha^2\mu} & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ \frac{-\gamma}{\alpha^2\mu} & 0 & \frac{\gamma^2}{\alpha^2\mu^2} + \frac{1}{\mu^2} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.
Then the group of isometric automorphisms of M_{\gamma} is exactly the one of M_1 or M_2. In fact we have

\operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_{\gamma}} \cong \left\lbrace\begin{array}{lll} \mathbf{D}(4) \quad \text{if}\; \frac{1}{\alpha^2} = \frac{1}{\mu^2} + \frac{\gamma^2}{\alpha^2\mu^2} \\ \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2 \quad \text{if}\; \frac{1}{\alpha^2} \neq \frac{1}{\mu^2} + \frac{\gamma^2}{\alpha^2\mu^2} \end{array}\right.

If we choose the metric U = \begin{bmatrix} \alpha & 0 & 0 & \nu\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \mu & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \quad \alpha, \mu > 0, \quad \nu \neq 0.
Its associated symmetric positive definite matrix is M_{\nu} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{\alpha^2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{-\nu}{\alpha^2}\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{\mu^2} & 0\\ \frac{-\nu}{\alpha^2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{\nu^2}{\alpha^2} + 1 \end{bmatrix}.
Then we have A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_2\right)_{M_{\nu}} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_{\nu}A = M_{\nu} \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, -1, 1, 1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.
In fact, for any other left-invariant Riemannian metric on G_2, the group of isometric automorphisms is isomorphic to one of the groups listed in Theorem 5.5.

Corollary

Corollary 5.7

BFII

The isometry group of the Lie group G_2 is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_2, M_1\right) &\cong& G_2 \rtimes \mathbf{D}(4)\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_2, M_2\right) &\cong& G_2 \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_2, M_3\right) &\cong& G_2 \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_2, M_4\right) &\cong& G_2. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.8

N4Y7

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R} are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} &= \{I_4\}. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.8

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{3, 2} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1 = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & 0\\ 0 & a_1 & a_7 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of \operatorname{A}_{3, 2} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1 = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}) of the above form , then

\begin{aligned} & A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1}\hspace{10cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A^tM_1A = M_1\hspace{11cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & a_2 = a_3 = a_7 = a_{15} = 0, \quad a_1 = \pm 1, \quad a_{16} = \pm 1 \hspace{5cm}\\ \Leftrightarrow & A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \cong \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2. \hspace{0.2cm} \end{aligned}

This is the maximal group of isometric automorphisms of G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}.
For the metric M_2, it suffices to verify which of the elements of \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} preserve the metric M_2. We obtain that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_2A = M_2 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace -1, -1, 1, -1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Finally, one can easily verify that: A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_3A = M_3 \Leftrightarrow A = I_4.

Corollary

Corollary 5.9

CMJR

The isometry group of the Lie group G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}, M_1\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}, M_2\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}, M_3\right) &\cong& G_{3.2} \times \mathbb{R}.\\ \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.10

1095

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R} are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} &= \left(\operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \operatorname{O}(2), 1, \pm1\right\rbrace \right)\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \operatorname{O}(2)\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_4} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.10

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{3, 3} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1 = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & 0\\ a_5 & a_6 & a_7 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form; then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{O}(4) \Leftrightarrow A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& \begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2\\ a_5 & a_6 \end{bmatrix} \in \operatorname{O}(2), a_3 = a_7 = a_{15} = 0, a_{16} = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} = \left(\operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \operatorname{O}(2), 1, \pm1\right\rbrace \right). This is the maximal group of isometric autmorphisms of G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}. For the metric M_2, one can see that

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_2A = M_2\\ &\Leftrightarrow& \begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2\\ a_5 & a_6 \end{bmatrix} \in \operatorname{O}(2), a_3 = a_7 = a_{15} = 0, a_{16} = 1. \end{aligned}

Thus \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} = \left(\operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \operatorname{O}(2), 1, 1\right\rbrace \right) \cong \operatorname{O}(2).
For the metric M_3, it suffices to verify which of the elements of \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} preserve M_3. We consider an automorphism of the form A = \begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2 & 0 & 0\\ a_5 & a_6 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}. Then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_3A = M_3\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_1 = a_{16} = \pm1, a_2 = 0, a_6 = \pm1, a_5 = 0 \end{aligned}

Hence

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

For the metric M_4, we obtain that

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_4} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_4A = M_4\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_{16} = a_1 = 1, a_2 = 0, a_6 = \pm1, a_5 = 0 \end{aligned}

Thus, \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_4} = \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, -1, 1, 1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Corollary

Corollary 5.11

AQGZ

The isometry group of G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}, M_{1}\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \left(\operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \operatorname{O}(2), 1, \pm1\right\rbrace \right)\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}, M_2\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \operatorname{O}(2)\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}, M_3\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}, M_4\right) &\cong& \left(G_{3.3} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.12

2VMZ

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_{c} \times \mathbb{R} are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^3\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_4} &= \left\lbrace I_4\right\rbrace. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.12

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{3, 5}^{\alpha} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1 = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & 0 & a_3 & 0\\ 0 & a_6 & a_7 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & a_{15} & a_{16} \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_3 = a_7 = a_{15} = 0, a_1 = \pm1, a_6 = \pm1, a_{16} = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} = \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \pm1, \pm1, 1, \pm1\right\rbrace \cong \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^3. This is the maximal group of isometric automorphisms on G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}. For the metric M_2, we have

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_2A = M_2\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_6 = a_{16} = \pm1, a_3 = 0, a_1 = \pm1 \end{aligned}

Additionally, comparing the (4, 3)-th and (3, 2)-th components of the matrices A^tM_2A and M_2 shows that a_7 and a_{15} must satisfy the following system

\left\lbrace\begin{array}{lll} -\lambda a_7 + (1 + \lambda^2)a_{15} = 0\\ a_7 - \lambda a_{15} = 0 \end{array}\right.

This implies that a_7 = a_{15} = 0. Thus

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_2} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

There is a simple way to find this result. Since \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_1} \cong \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^3 is the maximal group of isometric automorphisms, it suffices to verify which of its elements preserve the metric M_2. For the other two metrics, we use this simple way and we obtain that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_3} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_3A = M_3 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace -1, -1, 1, -1\right\rbrace\right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.
A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right)_{M_4} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_4A = M_4 \Leftrightarrow A = I_4.
Corollary

Corollary 5.13

ZRHX

The isometry group of G_{c} \times \mathbb{R} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}, M_{1}\right) &\cong& \left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^3\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}, M_2\right) &\cong& \left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}, M_3\right) &\cong& \left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}\right) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}, M_4\right) &\cong& G_{c} \times \mathbb{R}. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.14

ZV3C

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.2}^{\alpha} are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.14

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 2}^{\alpha} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003corrigendum]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & 0 & 0 & a_4\\ 0 & a_6 & a_7 & a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_6 & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_4 = a_7 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_1 = \pm1, a_6 = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Thus

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

For the metric M_2, we obtain that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_2} \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace -1, -1, -1, 1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

If we choose the metric U where \alpha > 0 and \gamma \neq 0, its group of isometric automorphisms is still \mathbb{Z}_2 as above.

Corollary

Corollary 5.15

JFFE

The isometry group of G_{4.2}^{\alpha} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}, M_{1}\right) &\cong& G_{4.2}^{\alpha} \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.2}^{\alpha}, M_{2}\right) &\cong& G_{4.2}^{\alpha} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.16

FS3V

The possible groups of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.2}^{1} are

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.16

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 2}^{1} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.2}^{1}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003corrigendum]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & 0 & a_3 & a_4\\ a_5 & a_6 & a_7 & a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_6 & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_3 = a_4 = a_5 = a_7 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_1 = \pm1, a_6 = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Thus

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}\right)_{M_1} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

This is the maximal group of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.2}^{1}. For the metric M_2, we obtain that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}\right)_{M_2} \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace -1, -1, -1, 1\right\rbrace \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.
Corollary

Corollary 5.17

DJFC

The isometry group of G_{4.2}^{1} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}, M_{1}\right) &\cong& G_{4.2}^{1} \rtimes \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.2}^{1}, M_{2}\right) &\cong& G_{4.2}^{1} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.18

2PV5

The group of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.4} is \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.4}\right)_{M_1} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Proof of Theorem 5.18

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 4} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.4}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & a_4\\ 0 & a_1 & a_2 & a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_1 & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.4}\right)_{M_1} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_1A = M_1 \Leftrightarrow a_2 = a_3 = a_4 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_1 = \pm1.

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.4}\right)_{M_1} = \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace -1, -1, -1, 1\right\rbrace\right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Corollary

Corollary 5.19

ZV5S

The group of isometries of G_{4.4} is given by: \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.4}, M_1\right) \cong G_{4.4} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2.

Theorem

Theorem 5.20

ZOFD

The group of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^3\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_3} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.20

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 5}^{\alpha, \beta} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_1 & 0 & 0 & a_4\\ 0 & a_6 & 0& a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_{11} & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_4 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_1 = \pm1, a_6 = \pm1, a_{11} = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_1} = \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace \pm1, \pm1, \pm1, 1\right\rbrace \cong \left(\mathbb{Z}_2\right)^3.
For the metric M_2, it suffices to verify which of the elements of \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_1} preserve M_2. We obtain that

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_2} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

Finally, one gets that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}\right)_{M_3} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_3A = M_3 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.
Corollary

Corollary 5.21

9YMI

The isometry group of G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}, M_1\right) &\cong& G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta} \rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_2)^3\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}, M_2\right) &\cong& G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta} \rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta}, M_3\right) &\cong& G_{4.5}^{\alpha, \beta} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.22

HHUD

The group of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.7} is given by:
\operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.7}\right)_{M_1} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2, \qquad \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.7}\right)_{M_2} = \left\lbrace I_4\right\rbrace.

Proof of Theorem 5.22

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 7} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.7}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_6^2 & -a_{12}a_6 & -a_{12}(a_6 + a_7) + a_6a_8 & a_4\\ 0 & a_6 & a_7 & a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_6 & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.7}\right)_{M_1} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_1A = M_1 \Leftrightarrow a_4 = a_7 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_6 = \pm1.

Hence \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.7}\right)_{M_1} = \left\lbrace I_4, \operatorname{diag}\left\lbrace 1, -1, -1, 1\right\rbrace\right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.
For the metric M_2, one gets that A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.7}\right)_{M_2} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_2A = M_2 \Leftrightarrow A = I_4.

Corollary

Corollary 5.23

TLBX

The group of isometries of G_{4.7} is given by:
\operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.7}, M_1\right) \cong G_{4.7} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2, \quad \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.7}, M_2\right) \cong G_{4.7}.

Theorem

Theorem 5.24

HE9Z

The group of isometric automorphisms of G_{4.8}^{\alpha} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_2} &\cong& \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_3} &= \left\lbrace I_4\right\rbrace. \end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 5.24

The automorphism group of \operatorname{A}_{4, 9}^{\beta} = \operatorname{Lie}(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}) consists of elements of the form [christodoulakis2003automorphisms]

\begin{bmatrix} a_{11}a_6 & -a_{12}a_6/\beta & a_8a_{11}& a_4\\ 0 & a_6 & 0 & a_8\\ 0 & 0 & a_{11} & a_{12}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let A be an automorphism of the above form, then

\begin{aligned} A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &\Leftrightarrow& A^tM_1A = M_1\\ &\Leftrightarrow& a_4 = a_8 = a_{12} = 0, a_6 = \pm1, a_{11} = \pm1. \end{aligned}

Hence

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_1} &= \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace\\ &\cong& (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2. \end{aligned}

For the metric M_2, we obtain that

A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_2} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_2A = M_2 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4, \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \right\rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}_2.

Finally, one can see that A \in \operatorname{Aut}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}\right)_{M_3} \Leftrightarrow A^tM_3A = M_3 \Leftrightarrow A \in \left\lbrace I_4 \right\rbrace.

Corollary

Corollary 5.25

24GK

The isometry group of G_{4.8}^{\alpha} is given by

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}, M_1\right) &\cong& G_{4.8}^{\alpha} \rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_2)^2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}, M_2\right) &\cong& G_{4.8}^{\alpha} \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2\\ \operatorname{Isom}\left(G_{4.8}^{\alpha}, M_3\right) &\cong& G_{4.8}^{\alpha}. \end{aligned}
Open question

Open question

V910

The study of the isometry group of left-invariant Riemannian metrics on the following Lie groups is still an open question:

  1. \operatorname{Sol}_{\mu}^4, \widetilde{\operatorname{Isom}_0(\mathbb{R}^2)} \times \mathbb{R} (unimodular solvable not of type (R), see [van2017metrics]).

  2. \widetilde{\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})} \times \mathbb{R}, \operatorname{SU}(2, \mathbb{R}) \times \mathbb{R} (unimodular non-solvable, see [van2017metrics]).

  3. The simply connected Lie groups associated with the following Lie algebras:
    \operatorname{A}_{3, 7}^{\alpha} \oplus \operatorname{A}_1, \operatorname{A}_{4, 6}^{\alpha, \beta}, \operatorname{A}_{4, 11}^{\alpha} and \operatorname{A}_{4, 12}. They are nonunimodular and not of type (R), as shown in this paper.

The classification of left-invariant Riemannian metrics on these Lie groups is given by [van2017metrics, aitbenhaddou2025classification]. The question is a bit complicated, but one can use the fact that the isotropy subgroup \operatorname{Isom}(G, g)_e can be injected into the intersection \operatorname{O}(\mathfrak{g}, g) \cap \mathcal{C}(\hat{r}), where \operatorname{O}(\mathfrak{g}, g) is the orthogonal group of \mathfrak{g} with respect to g, and \mathcal{C}(\hat{r}) is the subspace of matrices that commute with the Ricci transformation \hat{r} of (G, g). For more details, see the strategy used in the following paper [aitbenhaddou2024isometry]. The signature of the Ricci operator of left-invariant Riemannian metrics on four-dimensional Lie groups is studied in [kremlev2009signature, kremlev2010signature].

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2501.17009v2 by Youssef Ayad, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2501/2501.17009.jsonl.