Theorem 1
N4SVFor sufficiently large x, the interval [x, x+x^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}] contains an integer with a prime factor larger than x^{\frac{35}{36}-\varepsilon}.
Using Watt’s mean value theorem and a delicate sieve decomposition, the author shows that the interval [x, x+x^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}] contains an integer with a prime factor larger than x^{\frac{35}{36}-\varepsilon} for sufficiently large x. This gives a solution with \gamma = \frac{1}{36} to the Exercise 5.1 in Harman’s monograph and improves the previous record of the author proved in 2024, where \gamma = \frac{1}{26.5} is obtained.
For sufficiently large x, the interval [x, x+x^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}] contains an integer with a prime factor larger than x^{\frac{35}{36}-\varepsilon}.
([[HeathBrownJia1718], Lemma 1]). Suppose that M N = v and v^{\frac{17}{35}} \ll M \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}}. Then for (\log x)^{2B} \leqslant T \leqslant x^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon}{6}}, we have
([[HeathBrownJia1718], Lemma 2]). Suppose that M N L=v, M \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}} and N \ll v^{\frac{9}{35}}. Then for \sqrt{L} \leqslant T \leqslant x^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon}{6}}, we have
([[LRB122], Lemma 4.1]). Let T \geqslant 1, then
Suppose that M N H L=v, and M, N and H satisfy one of the following 3 conditions:
(1). M \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}},\ N \gg H,\ N^{\frac{3}{4}}H \ll v^{\frac{9}{35}},\ N H^{\frac{1}{2}} \ll v^{\frac{9}{35}},\ N^{\frac{7}{4}} H^{\frac{3}{2}} \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}};
(2). M \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}},\ N \ll v^{\frac{9}{35}},\ H \ll v^{\frac{9}{140}};
(3). M \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}},\ N^2 H \ll v^{\frac{18}{35}},\ H \ll v^{\frac{9}{70}}.
Then for \sqrt{L} \leqslant T \leqslant x^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon}{6}}, we have
We only need to prove that
holds true under each condition above.
Assume that Condition (1) holds. The proof of this case is similar to that of [[JiaLiu], Lemma 3] where [[DI84], Theorem 2] is used.
Assume that Condition (2) holds. Using Hölder’s inequality and the mean value theorem for Dirichlet polynomials, we have
By the mean value theorem for Dirichlet polynomials, we have
Note that \sqrt{L} \leqslant T, we have
Now, using Lemma 2.3 with N = H^2, we get
Combining the bounds above with Condition (2), we have
Note that this case is an improvement over Lemma 2.2.
Assume that Condition (3) holds. Using Hölder’s inequality and the mean value theorem for Dirichlet polynomials, we have
By Condition (3), Lemma 2.3 with N = H and the mean value theorem for Dirichlet polynomials, we have
Now the proof of Lemma 2.4 is completed.
We can give an asymptotic formula of the form (1) for
and similar sums involving role-reversals if (t_1, \ldots, t_n) \in \mathcal{J}_{n}.
We can give an asymptotic formula of the form (1) for
and similar sums involving role-reversals if (t_1, \ldots, t_n) \in \mathcal{I}_{n}.
The text on this page is from arXiv:2601.00910v1 by Runbo Li, under the licence CC BY SA 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY SA 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2601/2601.00910.jsonl.