arXiv reader

SU(3)-structures on quotients of 3-Sasakian orbifolds

Quentin Peres and Dimitrios Tsimpis

arXiv
2607.28337v2 · PDF · 31 July 2026
Categories
math.DG, hep-th
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We show that if (S,g,\xi_i,\eta_i,\Phi_i) is a quasi-regular 3-Sasakian orbifold of dimension 7, then its quotient Z by one of the Reeb vector fields inherits an SU(3)-structure parametrized by two real parameters. We compute its torsion and show that it is an LT-structure. Moreover, for certain values of the parameters, we can provide a nearly Kähler structure on Z appearing as a special case of our construction. We give several examples in the regular, quasi-regular and orbifold cases.

Items 42

Theorem

Theorem A

2JMN

Let (S,g,\xi_i,\eta_i,\Phi_i) be a (quasi)-regular 7 dimensional 3-Sasakian manifold and Z the quotient of S by the foliation generated by \xi_3. Denote (C(S),\bar g,J_i) the hyperkähler cone of S and the associated Kähler forms \omega_i:=\bar g(J_i\cdot,\cdot). The holomorphic volume form 2\Omega_{(4)}:=(\omega_1+i\omega_2)^2 is of charge 4i and \eta:=r^2(\eta_1+i\eta_2) is a twist form of charge 2i. Then, the following forms:

\omega:=\omega_3-\frac{i}{|\eta|^2}\eta\wedge\bar\eta,\,\, \Omega:=-i\bar\eta\wedge(\bar\eta\cdot(\iota_{\xi_3}\Omega_{(4)}))

produce an LT structure on Z. Moreover, the non-vanishing torsion classes are

W_1=\frac{8}{3},\, W_2=\frac{W_1}{2}(\omega+\frac{3i}{2}\eta\wedge\bar\eta).
Theorem

Theorem B

6WBA

Let (S,g,\xi_i,\eta_i,\Phi_i) be a (quasi)-regular 7 dimensional 3-Sasakian orbifold. Denote Z the quotient of S by the foliation generated by \xi_3. Consider the 2-forms \alpha_i defined by

2\alpha_i:=d\eta_i-\epsilon_{ijk}\eta_j\wedge\eta_k.

For a,b\in\mathbb{R} and c\in\mathbb{C}, we introduce

\omega_{a,b}:=a\alpha_3-\frac{i}{2}b^2\eta\wedge\bar\eta,\, \Omega_c:=c\alpha\wedge\bar\eta.

These two forms are basic with respect to \xi_3 and define an SU(3)-structure on Z iff

a>0,\,\, c\neq 0,\,\, b^2= \frac{|c|^2}{a^2}.

In that case, the SU(3)-structure is LT and the non-vanishing torsion classes are given by

W_1=\frac{4e^{i\gamma}(a+b^2)}{3ab},\, W_2=\frac{4e^{i\gamma}(2b^2-a)}{3ab}(\omega_{a,b}+\frac{3ib^2}{2}\eta\wedge\bar\eta),

where c=abe^{i\gamma}.

Corollary

Corollary C

UPMK

Using the parameters a and b, we can obtain two subclasses of structures summarized in the following table:

1.61.6

The paper has a table here, which this page does not show.
Definition

Definition 2.1.1

XJ67

An SU(n)-structure on a smooth manifold M of dimension 2n is an almost hermitian structure (g,J,\omega) on M with a normalized complex volume form \Omega, that is a nowhere vanishing section of \Lambda^{n,0}T^*M, the space of (n,0)-forms on M, such that

\omega\wedge\Omega=0,
\Omega\wedge\overline\Omega=c_n\frac{\omega^n}{n!},

where c_n=2^n(-i)^{n^2}.

Definition

Definition 2.1.2

C8GU

[Grayhervella, chiossi2002intrinsictorsionsu3g2] Let (M,g,J,\omega,\Omega) be an SU(n)-structure on a manifold M. The intrinsic torsion of the SU(n)-structure is

d\omega=\frac{3}{2^{n-2}}i^{(n+1)^2}\operatorname{Im}(\overline{W_1}\cdot\Omega)+W_4\wedge\omega+W_3,
d\Omega=W_1\wedge\omega^2+W_2\wedge\omega+\overline W_5\wedge\Omega,

where W_1 is a (n-3,0) form, W_2 a primitive (n-2,1)-form, W_3 a real primitive (2,1)+(1,2)-form, W_4 is a real (1,0)+(0,1)-form and W_5 is a (1,0)-form.

Definition

Definition 2.2.1

SW9M

An LT structure on M is an SU(n)-structure with W_3=W_4=W_5=0 with W_1 and W_2 both non-zero.

Definition

Definition 2.2.2

AIZZ

Let M be a smooth manifold with a real torus T acting on it with Lie algebra \mathfrak{t}. A form \alpha on M has charge k\in\mathfrak{t}^* if for every \zeta\in\mathfrak{t},

\mathcal{L}_{X_\zeta}\alpha=k(\zeta)\alpha,

where X_\zeta is the vector field induced by \zeta on M.

Definition

Definition 2.2.3

8B73

Let (M,J) be an almost complex manifold with a real torus T acting on it with Lie algebra \mathfrak{t}. A 1-form \alpha on M is a twist form if:

  1. \alpha is nowhere-vanishing and of type (1,0).

  2. \alpha is horizontal, i.e for every \zeta\in\mathfrak{t}, \alpha(X_\zeta)=0.

  3. \alpha has a charge k_\alpha\in\mathfrak{t}^*.

Theorem

Theorem 2.2.4

LHFO

[peres2026sunstructuresquotienttorusactions] Let (M^{2n+2s},g,J,\omega_0,\Omega_0) be a Kähler manifold of real dimension 2n+2s with an SU(n+s)-structure (\omega_0,\Omega_0). Suppose that a compact torus T^s of dimension s acts on M holomorphically and in a hamiltonian way with moment map \mu. Consider \mathfrak{t}:=Lie(T^s) the Lie algebra of T^s and choose a basis e_1,\cdots,e_s of \mathfrak{t} and denote V_i the vector field generated by e_i on M. Assume that \Omega_0 is of charge q\in\mathfrak{t}^* with respect to the T^s action and that there exists a twist form \alpha on M of charge \frac{q}{2}. Then, the following forms:

\omega:=\omega_0-\frac{i}{|\alpha|^2}\alpha\wedge\overline{\alpha},
\Omega:=\overline{\alpha}\wedge(\overline{\alpha}\cdot(\iota_{V_1}\cdots\iota_{V_s}\Omega_0)),

are basic with respect to the T^s action and define an SU(n)-structure on a regular quotient N=\mu^{-1}(c)/T^s for some c\in\mathfrak{t}^*.

Definition

Definition 3.1.1

OVW2

A Riemannian manifold (M,g) is an hyperkähler manifold if there exists three integrable complex structures J_1,J_2,J_3 such that (M,g,J_i) is Kähler for i=1,2,3 and J_1,J_2,J_3 satisfy the quaternionic relations

J_1^2=J_2^2=J_3^2=J_1J_2J_3=-1.
Lemma

Lemma 3.1.2

N4WT

\rho_1 is a non-degenerate, closed, (2,0)-form with respect to J_1.

Proof of Lemma 3.1.2

The non-degeneracy and closure of \rho_1 follow from the ones of \omega_2 and \omega_3. To prove that \rho_1 is (2,0) with respect to J_1 it suffices to prove that for any vector fields X,Y on M, we have

\rho_1(J_1X,Y)=i\rho_1(X,Y).

Using the quaternionic relations, we see that

\omega_2(J_1X,Y)=g(J_2J_1X,Y)=-g(J_3X,Y)=-\omega_3(X,Y),

which implies the result.

Proposition

Proposition 3.1.3

UJN1

(M,g,J_1,\omega_1,\Omega_{(2n)}) is an SU(2n)-structure without torsion.

Remark

Remark 3.1.1

JH0E

Note that we could have done a similar construction using either J_2 or J_3.

Definition

Definition 3.2.1

EAUT

A Riemannian manifold (S,g) is a 3-Sasakian manifold if its Riemannian cone (C(S)=S\times\mathbb{R}_{>0},\bar g=dr^2+r^2g) is an hyperkähler manifold.

Proposition

Proposition 3.2.2

XTWV

[Boyer:1998sf] Let (S,g) be a 3-Sasakian structure with Reeb vector fields \xi_i, dual contact 1-forms \eta_i and characteristic (1,1)-tensor \Phi_i. The following properties hold:

\eta_i(\xi_j)=\delta_{ij},\,\iota_{\xi_i}d\eta_i=0,
\Phi_i\xi_j=\epsilon_{ijk}\xi_k,
\Phi_i\Phi_j-\eta_j\otimes\xi_i=-\delta_{ij}+\epsilon_{ijk}\Phi_k,
[\xi_i,\xi_j]=-2\epsilon_{ijk}\xi_k,
\omega_i=\frac{1}{2}d(r^2\eta_i).
Used by Proof
Remark

Remark 3.2.1

CGJ5

It is well-known that the Sasakian manifold is Einstein iff its cone is Calabi-Yau. Since a hyperkähler manifold is in particular Calabi-Yau, every 3-Sasakian manifold is Einstein.

Remark

Remark 3.2.2

T1X9

Using the three Sasakian structures, we can in fact consider a whole S^2 family of Sasakian structures. More precisely, take u=(a,b,c)\in S^2 and consider \xi_u:=a\xi_1+b\xi_2+c\xi_3. This \xi_u defines another Reeb vector field and consequently another Sasakian structure. Note that this Reeb vector field corresponds to consider the complex structure J_u:=aJ_1+bJ_2+cJ_3 on the cone which also defines a Kähler structure associated to the metric \bar g.

Proposition

Proposition 3.2.3

Q55X

[Boyer:1998sf] Let (S,g,\xi_i,\eta_i,\Phi_i) be a compact 3-Sasakian manifold. The following statements are equivalent:

  1. \mathcal{F} is regular,

  2. For every u\in S^2,\,\mathcal{F}_u is regular,

  3. For one u\in S^2,\,\mathcal{F}_u is regular.

Definition

Definition 3.2.4

U990

Let (S,g,\xi_i) be a 3-Sasakian manifold. A 3-Sasakian isometry of (S,g,\xi_i) is a diffeomorphism \phi of S such that

\phi^*g=g,\, \phi_*\xi_i=\xi_i.

We denote \operatorname{Isom}(S,g,\xi) the group of 3-Sasakian isometries of (S,g,\xi_i).

Theorem

Theorem 3.2.5

SXA4

[Boyer:1998sf, Theorem 6.1.5] Let (S,g,\xi_i) be a 3-Sasakian manifold of dimension 4n+3. Assume that there is a connected compact Lie group G acting smoothly and properly on S by 3-Sasakian isometries. Let \mu_S be the corresponding 3-Sasakian moment map and suppose that 0 is a regular value of \mu_S and that G acts freely on \mu_S^{-1}(0). Then, the 3-Sasakian quotient S/\!\!/G=\mu^{-1}(0)/G is of dimension 4(n-\dim G)+3 and admits a 3-Sasakian structure (\hat g,\hat\xi_i) which are characterized by

g|_{\mu^{-1}_S(0)}=\pi^*\hat g,
\pi_*(\xi_i|_{\mu^{-1}_S(0)})=\hat\xi_i,

where \pi : \mu^{-1}_S(0)\to S/\!\!/G.

Theorem

Theorem 3.3.1

KNKN

[Friedrich:1990zg, Theorem 7] Let (S,g) be a compact simply connected regular 7-dimensional 3-Sasakian manifold. Then, S is isometric to either the 7-sphere or to SU(3)/U(1).

Remark

Remark 3.3.1

O795

This construction remains valid in the case where both S and the corresponding twistor space Z may have an orbifold structure.

Lemma

Lemma 3.4.1

2L52

We have

\mathcal{L}_{\xi_3}\eta_i=-2\epsilon_{ij3}\eta_j.
Proof of Lemma 3.4.1

This follows from the relation [\xi_i,\xi_j]=-2\epsilon_{ijk}\xi_k and the definition of the contact forms.

Proposition

Proposition 3.4.2

5XPR

The form \eta=r^2(\eta_1+i\eta_2) is a twist form of charge 2i on C(S) for the action of \xi_3.

Proof of Proposition 3.4.2

By Proposition 3.2.2, \eta is horizontal for \xi_3 and nowhere-vanishing as \eta(\xi_1)=r^2. Note that J_3\eta_1=-\frac{1}{r^2}\overline{g}(\xi_1,J_3\cdot)=\frac{1}{r^2}g(\xi_2,\cdot)=\eta_2 and so \eta is (1,0). Since r^2 is S^1-invariant, we get that \eta is indeed of charge 2i.

Lemma

Lemma 3.5.1

MG5L

For every a,b\in\mathbb{R}, c\in\mathbb{C}

\omega_{a,b}\wedge\Omega_c=0.
Proof of Lemma 3.5.1

Easy consequence from \alpha_3\wedge\alpha=0 and \bar\eta\wedge\bar\eta=0.

Proposition

Proposition 3.5.2

UI67

For every a,b\in\mathbb{R}, c\in\mathbb{C}

i\Omega_c\wedge\overline{\Omega_c}=-8|c|^2\mu_Z,
\omega_{a,b}^3=-6a^2b^2\mu_Z,

with \mu_Z the Riemannian volume form of g_Z on Z pulled back on S.

Proof of Proposition 3.5.2

First, remark that with these identifications, \mu_Z=\mu_B\wedge\eta_1\wedge\eta_2.

\begin{aligned} \Omega_c\wedge\overline{\Omega_c}&=-|c|^2\alpha\wedge\bar\alpha\wedge\eta\wedge\bar\eta\\ &=2i|c|^2(\alpha_1^2+\alpha_2^2)\wedge\eta_1\wedge\eta_2\\ &=8i|c|^2\mu_B\wedge\eta_1\wedge\eta_2\\ &=8i|c|^2\mu_Z\\ \omega_{a,b}^3&=(a\alpha_3-\frac{i}{2}b^2\eta\wedge\bar\eta)^3\\ &=-\frac{3a^2b^2i}{2}\alpha_3^2\wedge\eta\wedge\bar\eta\\ &=-\frac{3a^2b^2i}{2}2\mu_B\wedge(-2i\eta_1\wedge\eta_2)\\ &=-6a^2b^2\mu_Z \end{aligned}
Remark

Remark 3.5.1

1Y9Z

In the case where a<0, the metric has signature (2,4) and so we get an SU(1,2)-structure rather than an SU(3)-structure.

Lemma

Lemma 3.5.3

327H

On S, the following relations hold:

d\eta=2\alpha-2i\eta\wedge\eta_3

and

d\alpha=2i\alpha\wedge\eta_3-2i\alpha_3\wedge\eta.
Proof of Lemma 3.5.3

Using the definitions of the \eta_i and \alpha_j, one gets

\begin{aligned} d\eta&=d(\eta_1+i\eta_2)\\ &=2\alpha_1+2\eta_2\wedge\eta_3+i(2\alpha_2-2\eta_1\wedge\eta_3)\\ &=2\alpha-2i\eta\wedge\eta_3\\ d\alpha&=id(\eta\wedge\eta_3)\\ &=i(d\eta\wedge\eta_3-\eta\wedge d\eta_3)\\ &=i(2\alpha\wedge\eta_3-2\alpha_3\wedge\eta) \end{aligned}
Remark

Remark 3.5.2

2W1D

The almost complex structure induced by \Omega_{a,b,\gamma} is never integrable as W_1 and W_2 cannot be both zero simultaneously.

Remark

Remark 3.5.3

TNFS

Theorem A is a particular case of Theorem B where we have chosen a=b=1 and \gamma=0.

Proposition

Proposition 4.2.1

LAME

[Boyer:1998sf, Theorem 6.3.1, 7.1.2] Let P be an admissible k\times (n+1) integral matrix and denote T^k_P the action of A_P on \mathbb{H}^{n+1}. Then, the quotient S(P)=S^{4n+3}/\!\!/T^k_P is a smooth 3-Sasakian manifold.

Proposition

Proposition 4.2.2

1Z64

[Boyer:1998sf, Proposition 7.5.11] Let k>1 be an integer. Then, the second Betti number b_2 of S(k) is equal to k.

Theorem

Theorem 4.2.3

MX7N

[Boyer:1998sf, Theorem 2.3.5] Let B be a quaternionic Kähler orbifold with positive scalar curvature. Then, there is a principal SO(3) orbibundle S over B which admits an orbifold 3-Sasakian structure.

Theorem

Theorem 4.2.4

R06W

[Galicki1988, Theorem 4.26] Let q\leq p be positive coprime integers with p+q odd. Then, \mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2(2p,p+q,p+q) carries a positive self-dual Einstein metric.

Question

Question 1

Z32V

Can we smooth out the singularities of our SU(3)-structures in the quasi-regular and orbifold case? If so, can we preserve some of the torsion classes?

Question

Question 2

2SGH

Can we adopt this framework in higher dimension?

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2607.28337v2 by Quentin Peres and Dimitrios Tsimpis, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2607/2607.28337.jsonl.