On the exterior algebra \scalebox{1.2}{}^{(0,\bullet)} V^* we introduce the decreasing filtration
F^i [\scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} V^*] = \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\geq i)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^* \wedge \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} V^*.
Its filtered pieces are
F^i / F^{i+1} = \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,i)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^* \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} (L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*.
F induces a (bounded) filtration also on Q^\bullet:
F^i Q^\bullet = \mathcal S((\Gamma^*_L \times \Gamma^*_{\tilde L})/ \Gamma^* \times (\Lambda_L \cap \Lambda_{\tilde L})^* \times C_1) \otimes F^i [\scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} V^*]
The differential d = \nabla^{(0,1)} on Q^\bullet is compatible with it. The associated spectral sequence has terms
\begin{aligned}
E_0^{pq} &= [\mathcal S((\Gamma^*_L \times \Gamma^*_{\tilde L})/ \Gamma^* \times (\Lambda_L \cap \Lambda_{\tilde L})^*) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,q)} (L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*] \\
& \quad \widehat \otimes [\mathcal S(C_1) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,p)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*]
\end{aligned}
with differential d_0 \colon E_0^{pq} \to E_0^{p(q+1)} given by ?, in particular acting only on the first factor. Now
\mathcal S((\Gamma^*_L \times \Gamma^*_{\tilde L})/ \Gamma^* \times (\Lambda_L \cap \Lambda_{\tilde L})^*) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} (L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*
is isomorphic to
\oplus_{t \in T} (\mathcal S((\Gamma_L \cap \Gamma_{\tilde L})^* \times (\Lambda_L \cap \Lambda_{\tilde L})^*) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} (L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*, \nabla^{(0,1)}|_{L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L})
by equation ?. The summands are isomorphic to Dolbeault complexes with twisted differentials:
\Omega^{(0,\bullet)}( (L \cap \tilde L) / (\Gamma_L \cap \Gamma_{\tilde L}) \times (IL \cap I \tilde L) / \omega_K^{-1}(\Lambda_L \cap \Lambda_{\tilde L})), \bar \partial + 2\pi \mathbf{i} (\tilde \alpha - \alpha + \omega_K(b-\tilde b))^{(0,1)} ).
Its cohomology is hence
= \begin{cases}
&\scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^\bullet (L \cap \tilde L)_{\mathbb C} \text{, if } (\tilde \alpha - \alpha)|_{L \cap \tilde L} \in (\Gamma_L \cap \Gamma_{\tilde L})^* \text{ and } L_b \cap \tilde L_{\tilde b} \neq \emptyset \\
& 0 \text{, else. }
\end{cases}
Moreover, as T parametrises the connected components of L_b \cap \tilde L_{\tilde b}, we get
H^\bullet(L_b \cap \tilde L_{\tilde b}, \mathcal L_{\tilde \alpha - \alpha})
after summing over T (here \mathcal L_{\tilde \alpha - \alpha} denotes the local system associated to the 1-form \tilde \alpha - \alpha). Hence, the first page of the spectral sequence reads
E_1^{pq} = H^q(L_b \cap \tilde L_{\tilde b}, \mathcal L_{\tilde \alpha - \alpha}) \otimes [\mathcal S(C_1) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,p)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^*]
and the differential E_1^{pq} \to E_1^{(p+1)q} is induced by \tilde \nabla, see ?, and acts on the latter factor only. Recall that
C_1 \oplus C_2 = Z \cong V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)
is a Lagrangian splitting for \omega' and \omega' is of type (1,1) for I. We can choose C_1 to be totally real for I and C_2 := IC_1. Then
\mathcal S(C_1) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^* \cong (\mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(C_1) \otimes_{\mathbb R} \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^\bullet C_1) \otimes_{\mathbb R} \mathbb C
where the differential on \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(C_1) \otimes_{\mathbb R} \scalebox{1.2}{}^\bullet C_1 reads
d \colon C_1 \times \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(C_1) \to \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(C_1), \quad d_c(g)(v) = \partial_c g(v) - 2\pi \omega'(Ic,v) g(v).
Note that h := \omega'(I(-),(-)) is a symmetric non-degenerate bilinear form on C_1. Diagonalise h as
A h A^{*} = \mathrm{diag}(-1,...,-1,1,...,1).
Let r be the number of negative eigenvalues and s the number of positive eigenvalues. By Lemma 8.13, s coincides with the Hyperkähler Maslov index \eta_{\mathrm{HK}}(L_1,L_2). Define the complexes
S^- := \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(\mathbb R) \xrightarrow{\partial_x + 2\pi x } \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(\mathbb R),\quad S^+ := \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(\mathbb R) \xrightarrow{\partial_x - 2\pi x } \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(\mathbb R).
Using A, we obtain an isomorphism of Fréchet complexes \mathcal S_{\mathbb R}(C_1) \otimes_{\mathbb R} \scalebox{1.2}{}^\bullet C_1 \cong (S^-)^{\widehat \otimes r} \widehat \otimes (S^+)^{\widehat \otimes s}. There are continuous homotopy equivalences
S^- \simeq (\mathbb R \to 0) = \mathbb R,\quad S^+ \simeq (0 \to \mathbb R) =\mathbb R[1].
We conclude that
\mathcal S(C_1) \otimes \scalebox{1.2}{$\wedge$}^{(0,\bullet)} (V/(L \cap \tilde L \oplus IL \cap I \tilde L)^* \simeq \mathbb C[1]^{\otimes s} = \mathbb C[s]
so
E_2^{pq} = \begin{cases}
&H^q(L_b \cap \tilde L_{\tilde b},\mathcal L_{\tilde \alpha - \alpha}), \text{ if } p = s \\
&0, \text{ else. }
\end{cases} \qedhere