arXiv reader

On the structure of polynomial multicorrelation sequences arising from nilpotent actions

Jovan Andreevski and Felipe Hernández

arXiv
2610.22076v1 · PDF · 15 October 2026
Categories
math.DS, math.CO
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We prove that every polynomial multicorrelation sequence arising from nilpotent actions admits a decomposition into a generalized nilsequence and a null-sequence. This resolves a long-standing question of Frantzikinakis concerning the structure of polynomial multicorrelation sequences of commuting transformations. Our proof builds upon ideas underlying the norm convergence theorem of Walsh.

Items 6

Theorem

Theorem 1.1

L0VY

Let G be a nilpotent group. For every d, k\in \mathbb{N}, any polynomials p_{i,j}\in \mathbb{Z}[t], i\in [d], j\in [k], every G-measure-preserving system (X,\mathcal B,\mu,G), with the transformations T_1,\ldots,T_d\in G, and every f_0,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty(\mu) bounded by 1, we have the decomposition

\int f_0\cdot \left( \prod_{i=1}^{d} T_i^{p_{i,1}(n)} \right) f_1 \cdot \ldots \cdot \left( \prod_{i=1}^{d} T_i^{p_{i,k}(n)} \right) f_k d\mu = {\mathcal{N}}(n) + {\mathbf{e}}(n), \quad n\in \mathbb{N}

where {\mathcal{N}} is a generalized nilsequence bounded by 1, and {\mathbf{e}} is a null-sequence.

Theorem

Theorem 2.1

H7L0

For every s,d,k\in \mathbb{N}, any polynomials p_{i,j}\in \mathbb{Z}[t], i\in [d], j\in [k], there is \ell\in \mathbb{N} such that for every measure-preserving system (X,\mathcal{B},\mu,T_1,\ldots,T_{d}) with the transformations T_1,\ldots,T_{d} spanning a nilpotent group of class at most s, every f_1,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty(\mu) bounded by 1, and \varepsilon>0 we have the decomposition

\int \left( \prod_{i=1}^{d} T_i^{p_{i,1}(n)} \right) f_1 \cdot \ldots \cdot \left( \prod_{i=1}^{d} T_i^{p_{i,k}(n)} \right) f_k d\mu = {\mathcal{N}}_{\varepsilon}(n) + {\mathbf{e}}_\varepsilon(n), \quad n\in \mathbb{N}

where {\mathcal{N}}_{\varepsilon} is an \ell-step nilsequence bounded by 1 and {\mathbf{e}}_\varepsilon is an \epsilon-null-sequence.

Proposition

Proposition 2.2

RPVQ

Let G be a nilpotent group and (X,\mu,T) a G-system. Let g_1,\ldots,g_k,h_1,\ldots,h_l be polynomial sequences in G. For u_0,\ldots,u_k\in L^\infty(\mu), set

\mathcal{D}(n)=\int u_0 \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k h_j(n)u_j d\mu.

Then, for functions f_1,\ldots,f_k\in L^\infty(\mu), the uniform limit

\lim_{N-M \to \infty} \frac{1}{N-M} \sum_{n=M+1}^N \mathcal{D}(n) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j

exists in L^2(\mu).

Used by Proof
Proof

Proof

ZBE4

By [Zorin-Kranich16, Lemma 3.5], it is enough to prove that for every Fø lner sequence \Phi=(\Phi_N)_N, the limit in Proposition 2.2 for averages along \Phi exists. Fix a Fø lner sequence \Phi=(\Phi_N)_N. For N,M\in \mathbb{N}, we have that

\begin{aligned} &\left\lVert\mathcal{A}_{N,M} \mathcal{D}(n) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j \right\rVert_{L^2(\mu)}^2 \\ &= \int \left| \int u_0(y) \cdot \left( \mathcal{A}_{N,M} \prod_{j=1}^k h_j(n)u_j(y) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j(x) \right) d\mu(y) \right|^2 d\mu(x)\\ &\leq \left\lVertu_0\right\rVert_{L^2(\mu)}^2 \int \int \left| \mathcal{A}_{N,M} \prod_{j=1}^k h_j(n)u_j(y) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j(x) \right|^2 d\mu(y) d\mu(x), \end{aligned}

where we used the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the last step. We observe that

\begin{aligned} \int \int \left| \mathcal{A}_{N,M} \prod_{j=1}^k h_j(n)u_j(y) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j(x) \right|^2 d\mu(y) d\mu(x)&= \left\lVertA_{N,M} \prod_{j=1}^k (h_j\times g_j)(n)\left(u_j\otimes f_j\right)\right\rVert_{L^2(\mu\otimes \mu)}^2 \end{aligned}

where we denote by (h_j\times g_j)(n) the action of G\times G in the product X\times X. Since clearly h_j\times g_j is a polynomial sequence in the nilpotent group G\times G, we have by Walsh [Walsh12, Theorem 5.1] that

\lim_{\min\{N,M\}\to \infty}\left\lVertA_{N,M} \prod_{j=1}^k (h_j\times g_j)(n)(u_j\otimes f_j)\right\rVert_{L^2(\mu\otimes \mu)}=0,

concluding that

N\mapsto \frac{1}{|\Phi_N|} \sum_{n\in \Phi_N} \mathcal{D}(n) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^k g_j(n)f_j

is a Cauchy sequence in L^2(\mu), and thus it converges.

Proposition

Proposition 2.3

TF0O

Suppose, for every \varepsilon>0, a sequence a(n) can be written as a sum of a generalized nilsequence a_{\text{nil},\varepsilon}(n), a null-sequence a_{\text{null},\varepsilon}(n), and a sequence a_{\varepsilon}(n) which is uniformly bounded by \varepsilon. Then, a(n) is the sum of a generalized nilsequence and a null-sequence.

Lemma

Lemma 2.4

BDHS

Let {\mathcal{N}} be a generalized nilsequence and {\mathbf{e}} be a null-sequence. Then

\left\lVert{\mathcal{N}}\right\rVert_\infty\leq \left\lVert{\mathcal{N}}+{\mathbf{e}}\right\rVert_{\infty}.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2610.22076v1 by Jovan Andreevski and Felipe Hernández, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2610/2610.22076.jsonl.